July 27, 2017

In the United States District court
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
C/A No. 315-cv-03669-JFA-SVH

 

THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, PLAINTIFF

                        VERSUS

SOUTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE (SCSOS),
SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY (SCGOP):     DEFNDANTS

 

OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by DEFENDANT SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY OF JULY 13, 2017

 

For educated and less than educated citizens of the United States of America, as with citizens from throughout the free world, it is well known that one cannot get elected to any public office anywhere if s/he is not on the ballot; therefore, it is of primary importance for persons wishing to control who gets elected is to (1) control access to the ballot, and/or (2) control who gets to vote by taxing the voter.  In the USA this effort to control who votes, and/or who gets onto the ballot was addressed correctly and with finality on January 23, 1964 with passage of Amendment XXIV which states quite clearly that “any poll tax or other tax” is unconstitutional!.  Period!  Our Constitution governs our lives in the USA!

A tax on candidates for the office of President of the United States of America is as controlling of election results, as a tax on voters for candidates for the office of President of the United States of America.  Both taxes equally interfere with free, open democratic elections and are equally unconstitutional; yet, this Court, The United States District Court, District of South Carolina, Columbia in dealing with this “expedited” case filed by Plaintiff personally on September 15, 2015, by delay after delay of Plaintiff petition to the Court, and by granting special privileges to Defendant Secretary of State, South Carolina, would have us believe control of access to the ballot differs from control of voters, despite Amendment XXIV

Having been granted special treatment with side-bar and other arrangement between Defendant SOS  and The Court it appears now Defendant Republican Party of South Carolina demands with its Motion for Summary Judgment (7/13/2017) equal special treatment.  Since SOS was dismissed wrongly by this Court why should not Defendant GOP demand and obtain equal treatment?  NO!  You cannot use Amendment XIV, “equal protection of the laws”!

Plaintiff Coyne, a candidate for the office of President of the United States, refused to pay, did not pay and did not claim inability to pay, the required by government employees of the state of South Carolina demand, $40,000 Candidate tax (extortion), and pay it directly to Defendant Republican Party of South Carolina with Plaintiff Coyne being assured by government employee of state of South Carolina that it, South Carolina, would receive $20,000 of the $40,000 as a financial kick-back  (bribery) from Defendant Republican Party of South Carolina, such $20,000 to be used to  run and manage the polls on election day, a poll tax to interfere with who gets onto the ballot and, therefore, who gets elected.  Plaintiff Coyne does not pay extortion or bribery!       

A tax on voters as pre-condition to recognizing his/her right to vote interferes with an election, and a tax on who has access to the ballot results are the same:  illegal, unconstitutional!    The Court know this fact without needing to be told by Plaintiff; Defendant Secretary of State knows this without needing to be told by Plaintiff, Defendant Republican Party knows this without needing to be told by Plaintiff; yet, each, except SOS, of course which has refused to abide by The Court order of 9/15/2015 to answer all complaints by Plaintiff and was rewarded by The Court by being dismissed from the case, pretend not to know, not to notice:

 

  1. Plaintiff Motion for a trial by jury;
  2. Plaintiff Motion for change of venue;
  3. Plaintiff Motion for a judge who understands a need for “expedited” service;
  4. Plaintiff complaint of SOS manipulation of deadline date(s), change from 9/30/2015 mandate made on 9/9/2015 to 9/10/2015;
  5. Plaintiff complaint of Defendant SOS mandate (extortion) for a “signed and notarized” pledge of support for leadership of Defendant GOP;
  6. Plaintiff complaint of SOS for $40,000 in cash or certified check or wire transfer (extortion), both to be in the hands of SOS selected persons within the next 24 yours;
  7. Plaintiff complaint of SOS demanding agreement from candidate that $20,000 of his required poll tax of $40,000 would be shared 50/50 with SOS (bribery);
  8. Plaintiff complaint concerning innumerable Hatch Act violations (1939), of widespread use of candidates for POTUS Lindsey Graham, John Kasich and other insider candidates to appear on stage with Plaintiff during the 2016 Republican Party primary election debate;
  9. Plaintiff complaint of TOTAL inaction and production Plaintiff use of investigative results from our Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) concerning CRIMINAL ACTS CITED, AGAIN, HEREIN, AND MORE; and,
  10. ALL THIS INFORMATION, AND MORE, IS CONTAINED IN MOTIONS, IN WELL-KNOWN COURT DOCUMENTS, AND REMEMBER TO KEEP THIS IN MIND AS WELL: 

A POLL TAX ON CANDIDATES FOR POTUS, as demanded in this case of Plaintiff Coyne as pre-condition to having his name on the ballot, IS EQUAL IN RESULT(S) TO A POLL TAX ON VOTERS.  BOTH TAXES VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMENDMENT XXIV!

THIS IS A CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CASE!  IN PRETENDING OTHERWISE (1) THIS COURT, AND (2) EACH OF TWO DEFENDANTS MAY THINK STONEWALLING IS POLITICALLY SUPPORTABLE:  CORRRUPT ‘ELECTED BOSSES MIGHT BAIL YOU OUT’?  NO!  AT BEST, STONEWALLING IS A TEMPORARY CONDITION! 1

 

By:  Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.
(Financial Economist & Candidate for POTUS, 2016
_________________________________________________________________

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne does hereby certify that this date, July 27, 2017, as Plaintiff in this case 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH, by U.S. Postal Service, this MOTION IN OBJECTION TO SUMMARY  JUDGMENT DEMAND OF July 13, 2017 by Defendant South Carolina Republican Party has been sent to the Clerk of Court, District Court of South Carolina, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, S. C. 29201, and to the following persons/organizations: 

  1. Alphonso Norris, FBI. Special Agent in Charge, 151 W. Park Blvd., Columbia, South Carolina 29201; also, Assistant Special Agent, Douglas Hemminghaus; and, Chief Division Counsel, Donald A. Wood.
  2. FBI, Director, 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 20535-0001; also, Monique A. Bookstein, FBI Ombudsman; and, Patrick W. Kelley, FBI Integrity Compliance Officer.
  3.  Robert Johnson, FBI, Special Agent in Charge, 3311 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203.
  4. Mark Hammond, SOS, South Carolina

1205 Pendleton St. # 525.
 Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Bowers Law Office

P. O. Box 50549
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Terry L. Wooten, Chief

U. S. District Judge
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. South Carolina Republican Party

Office of Nat Moore
1913 Marion Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. U. S. Attorney for South Carolina

1441 Main Street, # 500
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Office of Governor

1205 Pendleton St.
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. OTHER(S)

______________________________________________________________________________

1 In fairness to The SC Dist. Court and each of two (2) Defendants, stonewalling might work as it has worked to date at least for the State of West Virginia, Federal District Court of Northern West Virginia, Wheeling, Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. Judge, who found in favor of Plaintiff Coyne from his bench,  and who after considerable delays issued an inaccurate, incorrect “official transcript” of open court proceedings that had been held in Wheeling, 12th & Eoff Sts. Ironically enough, I appeared in court in Wheeling on this very date in 2004, July 27.  The Frederick P. Stamp, jr. transcript somehow failed to mention Judge Stamp’s outrage at Deputy Attorney General, WV, in favor of Coyne in open Court in Wheeling.  Stamp found in written order in favor of WV.  A copy of page 1 of my statement in court in Wheeling on July 27, 2004 is enclosed. Joseph Manchin was SOS in WV then and is US Senator now (D.WV).   

Enclosed as well are copies of my January 25, 2017 and June 20, 2017 Motions.  It appears neither may have reached The Court in Columbia, South Carolina.   As with negligence of our FBI in Wheeling, WV (the Pittsburgh, Pa. office) this C/A No. 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH case has been neglected by our FBI, itself in violation of The Hatch Act (1939) for having done so. 
As I told Judge Stamp, Jr. in Wheeling I tell this Court in Columbia now:   “In closing, and ironically, I find myself preparing this statement for the court at 10:00 AM on July 27, 2004, ironic because it was precisely 10:00 AM on July 27, 1953 when I sat atop Sandbag Castle, Korea, as the Korean cease fire was announced. Shooting stopped twelve hours later, at precisely 10:00 PM, July 27, 1953.  Many men from Wheeling, Weirton, elsewhere in West Virginia and throughout the nation, were serving in Korea at the time to guard our Constitution, the greatest document ever reduced to writing.  Our men acted with honor in defense of democracy, of the right to petition, of the right, but not the requirement to vote; we wanted, fought for and expected justice in the domestic American jurisprudence system upon return home. West Virginia veterans, and many, many others from around the nation, by 10:00 PM the night of July 27, 1953 were proud, dirty, hungry, battle-worn and tired, very tired, but many, in fact, most, survived and their finest hours were yet to come.  Each man slept most of the next day, July 28, 1953.  Your Honor, we must not sleep today, July 28, 2004!” 
 

________________________________________

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.
Arbitration Resume
                                                             FMCS Arbitrator # 1419

Email, the preferred method of contact: tom@coyne-assoc.com;

CURRENT ACTIVITY: Candidate for the Office of President of the United States of America, 2016 (POTUS);  Arbitration; Mediation; Financial Management & Securities; Author; Publisher; tenured full Professor of Finance (inactive).  I attempted to get my name, without success, on the ballot in the 2016 Republican Party Primary Election, South Carolina.  (The case concerning Federal Court and Defendants blockage of my efforts remains pending as of this late date, 7/14/2017, The United States District Court, District of South Carolina, Columbia Division.  It is an “Expedited” case filed 9/15/2015, # C/A No.3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH).

FIRST BUSINESS ADDRESS:                                          SECOND BUSINESS ADDRESS:

Coyne & Associates, Inc.                                                         Coyne & Associates, Inc.
535 Haskell Dr.                                                                       6030 East Pea Ridge Road     
Akron, Ohio 44333                                                                  Captain Unit
Phone: (330) 836-0563                                                           Huntington, W. Va., 25705

EDUCATION:
Ph. D, Economics/Investments/Banking & Finance, Case Western Reserve University
          Post-doctoral study: Monetary Theory/Price Theory, University of Chicago
          Post-doctoral study: Computers, University of Michigan; and, Institut Catholique des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (ICHEC), Brussels, Belgium
MBA, Management/Finance, Kent State University
BBA, Accounting/Economics, Marshall University

ARBITRATION/LABOR RELATIONS EXPERIENCE:

I am a Ph.D. Financial Economist, and 2016 Candidate for the Office of President of the United States of America – POTUS. 

I served as Chief Negotiator, Numerous City and Local Boards of Education, State of Ohio, responsible for many hundreds of cases dealing heavily with finance (1970s and 80s). I have traveled extensively: Russia, Byelorussia, Latvia, Croatia, Holland, England, The Netherlands, Ireland, Brussels and other locations, lecturing and/or presenting papers in Finance and labor-related Finance (1980s). When I visited the former USSR in Moscow, Leningrad and other Soviet locations as Leader of the Finance Delegation (36 persons) and at U.S. State Department expense, our flight on Pan Am left New York without us.  Upon hearing of this situation the head of Aeroflot USSR flew us to Shannon, Ireland, all expenses Soviet-paid 1st Class on Aer Lingus, and arranged for one of its planes returning Russian troops home from Cuba to stop for us in Shannon and take my Delegation to Moscow (USSR flights were not allowed to land in USA at the time and Moscow banks were waiting for me). The Boards of Directors of each USSR bank – one in Moscow, the other in Leningrad - (2 banks only in all of USSR at that time) were awaiting the Coyne Finance Delegation.  I met and spoke privately with Boris Yeltzin on this trip (1989).  In 1990 the Publication Department, People to People International, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Founder, President George Bush, Honorary Chairman, published and distributed a journal regarding my “Financial Management Delegation to the U.S.S.R.” effort.

I have a web site which reveals most of my current professional activities:  www.coyne-assoc.com. I have served on expedited arbitration panels, as a permanent umpire for the U. S. Air Force, Heath, Ohio, and as fact finder for scores of education cases in the state of Ohio.

I am a former B&O railroad brakeman, a former C&O railway officer.  After writing my Master’s Thesis (MBA):  “Proposals of the Railroads for Alleviating Their Financial Crisis” (copy available, Archives, Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI), John Kusik, CEO, C&O Railway, and Cyrus Eaton, Principal stockholder, C&O Railway, and receipt of my MBA, hired me as an officer on C&O. I appeared before the Interstate Commerce Commission dealing with per diem rate cases of railroad cars; more significantly, I worked closely and significantly with Cyrus Eaton as we merged the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway with the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad.  (That railroad today is called CSX).

After writing my Ph.D. dissertation:  “Banking Structure in West Virginia” (copy available, Archives, Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI), and having it published by Legislative Services Committee, State of WV, West Virginia passed legislation to allow state-wide branch banking.  Prior to publication of my dissertation, WV was the ONLY state in the USA disallowing branch banking.

I was a tenured, full-time full professor of finance/economics at fully accredited (AACSB) universities (MBA studies) for the better part of 33 years. I have extensive experience (managed millions of dollars per client, without losing any money for anyone) with stocks, bonds, T-Bills, notes and other financial matters (mergers/acquisition), have experience with the high profile, highly paid sports figure, and am eligible for Department of Defense and other government assignments. I have a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code number.

I am a licensed pilot; I hosted a live 50,000 watt call-in talk radio show broadcast simultaneously in Cleveland and Youngstown, Ohio.  I am available for foreign assignments.

I am a an honorably discharged combat veteran of the Korean Conflict, having served in Co. L., 180th Infantry Regiment, 45th Infantry Division, Sandbag Castle, Korea and am a recipient of the Korean Service Medal with two (2) Bronze Service Stars, the United Nations Service Medal, the National Defense Medal, the Combat Infantry Badge (CIB), the Good Conduct Medal, and a Letter of Appreciation from Kim Dae-jung, President of the Republic of Korea.

I am a former member of the National Association of Securities Dealers Association (NASD) Board of Arbitrators, a member of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service Board of Arbitrators, and a member of The National Mediation Board, Washington, D.C.

INDUSTRIES:

Aerospace; automotive, coal, education, mining, nuclear energy, police and fire, printing and publishing, railroads, rubber and tire, steel, transportation, plus just about all others, to include many permanent panels:  District 1199WVKYOH, SEIU, AFL-CIO, and Pride In Logan County, Inc., 9/1/2003 – 9/1/2006; Ohio Nurses Association and the Western Reserve Care System; National Bituminous Coal Producers Association and The United Mine Workers of America, District, #2, Pennsylvania; United States Air Force, Heath, Ohio; McDowell County Commission on Aging.

ISSUES:  Being a Professor of Finance, I excel in properly locating, addressing and solving finance-related disputes arising as a result of planned albeit illegal fraudulent back-dating of employee date of hire time and location and years worked records for alleged pension(s) entitlement purposes.

Absenteeism, 'arbitrability', conduct (off-duty/personal), discipline non-discharge, discipline (discharge), sexual abuse of client, race, national origin, job posting/bidding, management rights, past practices, pension and welfare plans, retirement, seniority, subcontracting/contracting-out, tenure/reappointment, strikes, lockouts, work stoppages, slowdowns, cost-of-living pay, overtime pay, severance pay, vacation pay, work hours/ scheduled assignments, working conditions/work orders, violence or threats, plus others. 

PUBLISHED CASES:

Approximately 100 cases have been published, most of which, most likely, are included on my web page:  www.coyne-assoc.com.  With respect to publication the following is important:  Unless notified by the parties to the contrary and in advance of the oral hearing, all Awards are submitted for publication consideration; moreover, the case begins with submission of Joint Exhibits. 

Books: (1) License to Lie, fiction, (ISBN: 0-9633192-2-1), 2000; (2) How to Take Charge of Yourself, Your Money, Your Government, college, non-fiction, (ISBN: 0-9633182-1-3), 1999; Readings in Managerial Economics, (five editions, 1973 – 1992) college, (MBA), (ISBN: 0-9633192-0-5), 1992; Managerial Economics: Analysis and Cases Fifth Edition, college, (ISBN: 0-256-02698-X), 1984; and, The Coyne Report: October 2011, (Revere Local Government Schools,), ISBN 9-781470-006433, 2011, plus numerous monographs (100’s), and several other books.

Articles: (Refereed, peer reviewed), “Individually Selected Stocks versus Mutual Funds,” Personal Financial Planning, January/February, 1999; The Coyne Quarterly, Internet online with approximately 100 articles published 2002 to date: www.coyne-assoc.com, (The Coyne Quarterly was published in hard copy prior to 2000). Well over 200 additional peer-reviewed and other articles have been published in finance and economic journals throughout the USA and abroad.  A large number of newspaper commentaries have been published. (I graced the cover of Banka, Zagreb, Croatia).

PER DIEM FEE: $1,000.00; DOCKETING FEE: One per diem fee is payable in advance and credited to the parties as part of the final bill/invoice. 

CANCELLATION FEE:  Almost never is a cancellation fee necessary and none is charged provided the oral hearing is cancelled early enough to fill the time slot; otherwise, one per Diem.

Interest Arbitration, Fact-finding and Mediation: $1,000.00 per day with 5.5 hours comprising one day; travel time is charged one day each day needed; study time is charged one day for each day necessary; a flat-fee of $150 is charged for administrative expenses, to include telephone, postage and similar charges.  Total mediation fees & expenses almost never exceed $5,000.

Expenses: Arbitrator charges actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred (i.e. hotel, food, air travel). Automobile mileage is charged at the applicable IRS expense rate.

            This fee schedule is forwarded to the parties immediately upon selection.

 

July 15, 2017

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

July 3, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
C/A No. 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH

___________________________________________________________________

THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, PLAINTIFF
                         
                                    VERSUS

SOUTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE (SCSOS)

                                       AND

SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY (SCGOP), DEFENDANTS

___________________________________________________________________

Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Coyne

 

Civil Rule of Procedure 12

All Charges made by Plaintiff are valid if left unanswered within 60 days:  (A) SCSOS failed to answer charges within 60 days of 9/15/2015, and (B) SCSOS failed to abide by and/or follow a direct order from this Court telling it to do so.  Summary Judgment in favor of Plaintiff is required; otherwise, this Court rewards Defendants for Defendants intentional violation of, rejection of a direct order from this Court.

Intentional delay(s) is evidence of Bad Faith. Defendants intentionally delayed this case, acted in Bad Faith and cannot be permitted to benefit from their bad behavior. 

Additionally, importantly, SCGOP argues wrongly no “poll tax” existed in the S.C. Republican Party Primary Election of 2016.  It is a sophomoric argument at best.  SCGOP says the money paid and received (extortion and bribery) is used to “run the polls.”  The money must have been a “donation” or other kind of tax but it was not a poll tax?  This meaningless argument flies in the face of Amendment XXIV, U. S. Constitution:  “The right of citizens . . . to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President . . . shall not be denied OR ABRIDGED by . . . any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax, OR OTHER TAX.”  (Ratified 1/23/1964.  Emphasis provided).  Plaintiff refused to pay the poll tax and/or the “other tax” in the rigged Republican Party election of 2016!   Plaintiff was denied his Constitutional right to compete openly and fairly for the Office of President of the United States of America!

This “other tax” controls who is permitted onto the ballot, thereby controlling who gets elected.  This “other tax” manipulates the election fraudulently, arranges it in a dishonest way, and arranges otherwise the primary election in favor of selfish, ‘insider’ life-long politicians!  By controlling who gets on the ballot the outcome is fixed, rigged because NO person may be elected unless s/he is allowed on the ballot!
                                                                                                  
Financial Damages Due Plaintiff:

Financial damages due Plaintiff include $1,600,000 minimum plus punitive damages, RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization) damages, court costs and other financial damages as determined by the jury.

Written in Bath, Ohio, USA
The 3rd day of July, 2017

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D.,


Candidate for POTUS, 2016

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Thomas Joseph Coyne does hereby certify that this date, July 3, 2017, as Plaintiff in this case 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH, by U.S. Postal Service, this MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT has been sent to the Clerk of Court, District Court of South Carolina, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, S. C. 29201, and to the following persons/organizations: 

  1. Alphonso Norris, FBI. Special Agent in Charge, 151 W. Park Blvd., Columbia, South Carolina 29201; also, Assistant Special Agent, Douglas Hemminghaus; and, Chief Division Counsel, Donald A. Wood.
  2. FBI, Director, 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 20535-0001; also, Monique A. Bookstein, FBI Ombudsman; and, Patrick W. Kelley, FBI Integrity Compliance Officer.
  3.  Robert Johnson, FBI, Special Agent in Charge, 3311 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203.
  4. Mark Hammond, SOS, South Carolina

1205 Pendleton St. # 525.
 Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Bowers Law Office

P. O. Box 50549
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Terry L. Wooten, Chief

U. S. District Judge
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. South Carolina Republican Party

Office of Nat Moore
1913 Marion Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. U. S. Attorney for South Carolina

1441 Main Street, # 500
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Office of Governor

1205 Pendleton St.
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. OTHER(S)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

June 20, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
C/A No. 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH

___________________________________________________________________

THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, PLAINTIFF
                         
                                    VERSUS

SOUTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE (SCSOS)

                                       AND

SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY (SCGOP), DEFENDANTS

___________________________________________________________________

“Response to Motion to Dismiss and/or Response to Summary Judgment”
Regarding “Roseboro” Order to Plaintiff Coyne

 

In responding to this order to Plaintiff prepared after almost two (2) years of delay and mailed by The Court on June 14, 2017, the precise time and date of preparation of Defendant SCGOP Motion for Summary Judgment, June 14, 2017 Plaintiff finds himself impressed with the efficiency of The Court and the unbelievably prompt response it made to one of the defendants, SCGOP.  The Court is reminded of its Order Entry Number 10 of 09/15/15:  “Defendants (plural emphasis added) are directed to file an answer to the complaint or otherwise plead.”   SCSOS failed to abide or plead in accordance with the 09/15/15 order of the Court; yet, the Court allowed SCSOS to file and win a motion much later in the case, using ‘new’ information in violation of Civil Rule of Procedure # 12.  The Court was wrong to do so.

Defendant SCSOS failed to answer any Plaintiff pleadings within the 60 day time frame (beginning 9/15/2015)   mandated by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure #12 causing defendant SCSOS to have no standing in this matter; however, SCSOS submitted a motion with new data SUBSEQUENT to the 60 day requirement even though SCSOS had no standing and, wrongly, The Court allowed, awarded the SCSOS Motion to detrimental financially and otherwise harmful to pro se Plaintiff. 

Again, wrongly, The Court order being answered here omits SCSOS in its “order.”  See document 63-1, filed 06/14/2017, page 1, of 7 pages.  Plaintiff considers special treatment of SCSOS throughout this proceeding financially and otherwise damaging to Plaintiff, and potentially fatal to Plaintiff’s case. 

Plaintiff objects strongly to any notion of dismissal of this civil and criminal case: 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH, filed 09/15/2015.  The Court by its actions in favor of defendant may have identified itself hostile to Plaintiff and too prejudicial to issue any legitimate, just ruling regarding the issues in this case?  It is a prejudicial nature of The Court over an almost two year time frame that prompted Plaintiff’s filing of his unanswered Motion of January 25, 2017, copy attached, to “most reluctantly” . . .  “request (for a) different Judge(s) to include a different venue and, of course, if the case goes to court, a trial by jury as requested some time ago.” 

A Motion to Amend is always in order!  The right to grieve is always in order!

Plaintiff received NO answer from one Defendant (SCSOS), while The Court issued a potential dismissal order to assist the other Defendant (SCGOP), and wrote a Roseboro order to Plaintiff and all within minutes of SCGOP’s Motion, with each document being written ostensibly in different offices? 

PLEASE READ/RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF MOTION OF JANUARY 25, 2017, AND OTHER UNANSWERED MOTIONS.

 

Merits of the Case:

            FACTS ABOUT WHICH PLAINTIFF THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE HAS PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE AND ABOUT WHICH HE WILL SWEAR UNDER OATH BEFORE A JURY IN A COURT OF LAW INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING AS HE WINS THIS CASE AGAINST TWO DEFENDANTS, SCGOP AND SCSOS as they violated The Hatch Act.  Plaintiff will tell anyone who asks.  Please see below:

  1. At 3:00 PM on September 9, 2015, Plaintiff asked South Carolina Board of Elections what it takes to get his name onto the ballot for the Republican Party Primary Election to be held in 2016.  “It is easy” was the answer.  The gist of the answer: “All you need to do is send $40,000.00 to the Republican Party of South Carolina accompanied by a signed notarized statement pledging loyalty, support for the head of the Republican Party.  Payment must be in cash or certified check, and paid no later than September 10, 2016 (the next day).  (Prior to Plaintiff raising his question the deadline date had been 9/30/2015).

 

What we have here is a Board of Elections official soliciting (money) contributions, and a written, notarized pledge of allegiance to a not-for-profit third party, the Republican Party in violation of The Hatch Act (1939).  This case is won here and now without another word.  See 5 CFR 2635.704, misuse of government property, 5 CFR 2635. 705, use of official time and/or The Hatch Act itself, 5 USC 7323 and 7324. 

No legal cases are quoted and therefore cannot be cited. No legal cases exist arguing this issue!  The Court is asked here to break new ground, precisely why taxpayers support the current system of laws. 

PLAINTIFF CONTINUES SO AS TO COMPLY WITH THE LETTER AND SPIRIT OF THE COURT ORDER OF JUNE 14, 2017.

A government employee cannot solicit or receive political contributions!  The $20,000 is a contribution to government from the Republican Party taken by the Party from the $40,000 paid to the Republican Party by each candidate for POTUS.  In this case on duty government persons solicited and received money and benefits, and otherwise engaged in political activity while on duty, and in a government building. In conducting itself in this illegal manner, on duty  government and Republican Party persons damaged seriously and otherwise harmed Plaintiff, making it impossible for him to compete for the position of POTUS, and depriving the nation of whatever benefit, if any, it might have enjoyed otherwise.

Do not send the money directly to us, the South Carolina Board of Elections, send it to the Republican Party, but do not send it at all without attaching/including the notarized, signed pledge to support the Republican Party”.  In violation of The Hatch Act (1939) this government employee was soliciting money and other valuable assets, the signed, notarized pledge of support for a third party, the Republican Party of South Carolina, and doing so from a government office and using government equipment.  What happens to the $40,000, Plaintiff asked the South Carolina Board of Elections government employee?  Answer:  “The $40,000 is distributed to various offices, persons and interests, whatever it takes to protect the Republican Party.”
 
Will U. S. Senator Lindsey Graham get some of it?  Answer:  “Perhaps, don’t know.”  Graham was to be the same stage with Plaintiff if he, Plaintiff, was allowed to compete for the privilege of serving as POTUS.  The job pays $1,600,000 per term currently and denial of Plaintiff’s right to compete for POTUS damages him by this amount, and more. 

Other government employees were expected to appear on the same stage with Plaintiff and Graham and benefit potentially from the extortion and bribery commented upon here include, not limited to, Kasich, Walker, Rubio, Cruz, Paul, Santorum.  (An FBI investigation is needed to confirm such participation). 

As of 3:30 PM on 9/9/2015 Plaintiff was assured seven (7) candidates had paid the $40,000 and submitted the signed and notarized pledge of support.  Trump had yet to pay but was expected on Thursday to pay, as were a few others.  “The process is easy” I was assured throughout by S.C. government officials, but “if you do not sign the form we will refuse the money, and you are not on the ballot.”

The Republican Party of South Carolina confirmed a little after 3:00 PM on the same date, the 9th, to Plaintiff personally, this same information provided by S.C. State Board of Elections, and more. Phone numbers and names of Government persons at Board of Elections and politicians at Republican Party and SOS of South Carolina are available at this time but not released here and now.  The jury will be given this information if necessary.

 

  1. The deadline date for submission is September 30, Plaintiff said, to which S. C. Board of Elections said “the date changed as we are speaking and it must be tomorrow.  The date has changed before and might again, but you are safe if we get the signed form and the money tomorrow,” Plaintiff was told by Board of Elections:  We do “whatever it takes to protect the (Republican) Party.” (Another violation of the Hatch Act).
  1. The notarized candidate “statement” is more important than the money, Board of Elections told Plaintiff:  You “must” have both and at the same time, and by tomorrow.  The South Carolina Board of Elections manipulated the deadline date from 9/30/2015 to 9/10/2015, while talking with Plaintiff, doing “whatever it takes to protect the Republican Party.”  This manipulation of primary election deadline dates as done in this case, “the first in the south,” a primary election required of the state to participate in national election for POTUS, by an appointed State Elections Department government official in South Carolina is another gross violation of the Hatch Act.  The change of date is major interference with a primary election by a government official – a Criminal act, and a discriminatory Civil act, one prohibiting a well-qualified, combat veteran,  Plaintiff,  from competing for a government position paying $1,600,000 (one term, 4 years @ $400,000. Plaintiff said earlier he was willing to serve one term only.  He would select a qualified female vice president to groom).         

 

  1. The person speaking on behalf of the S. C. Election Board was a government employee of the state of South Carolina and soliciting money from a POTIUS candidate, Plaintiff, on behalf of a tax exempt outside non-government political party, the Republican Party.  At that very instant this government employee was violating the Hatch Act, and Plaintiff knew it.  Plaintiff won his case before he submitted it for trial by jury in Columbia, South Carolina.  The Board of Elections official continued:  “we will do whatever it takes to protect the (Republican) Party”. 
  1. Plaintiff asked:  “what happens to the $40,000 once he pays the Republican Party”?  It goes to support the Party, and to pay for operation of the polls on Election Day he was told.  Board of Elections stressed this:  “The Republican Party does not keep all the money ($40,000). It sends immediately upon receipt $20,000, ½ of the $40,000 to us here at the Board of Elections so we can run and manage the polls on Election Day”.  Plaintiff said he would not pay a poll tax and he would not sign a notarized pledge of allegiance to the head of the Republican Party.  Again, and again, Board of Elections told Plaintiff:  “no money and no notarized form, no name on the primary ballot, your choice”.  Clearly, access to the ballot “was easy” if one wants and is financially able to pay a poll tax, contribute to the campaign of a sitting U.S. Senator, and not be bothered about government employees working and being paid for full time employment in S. C. while working as a collection agent for a tax-free political machine, the Republican Party.

 

Lindsey Graham, U. S. Senator (R. S.C.) had filed for the office of POTUS and would be sharing the stage with Plaintiff who asked if Senator Graham would be receiving any of the $40,000 paid by Plaintiff and/or any of the $20,000 kicked back by the Party to the state of South Carolina; if so, Plaintiff would be subsidizing financially an exceedingly well paid government employee, Graham.  Plaintiff would be helping his competitor defeat him, Plaintiff said.  Plaintiff did not want to subsidize his competitor for the office, Senator Graham.  Board of Elections response again: “No money and no form from you and no ballot, your choice!”

  1. The Board of Elections engaged openly in collecting money for a political party activity (Another Hatch Act violation): (A) extortion, demanding a signed, notarized pledge to the Party plus $40,000 to be sent to this third party tax-exempt private political Republican Party to illegally influence a so-called free and open national election, another Hatch Act violation; and, (B) bribery, Republican Party employees, paying back, kicking-back ½ of money obtained ($20,000) under duress of $40,000, as pre-condition, as payment for performing duties Board of Election government employees were required to perform, and had agreed to perform, and were paid well with money and fringe benefits to perform anyway,  (additional Hatch Act violations; (C) Manipulated Deadline Date Changes, in an effort to interfere with elections, to determine who gets onto the ballot (Another Hatch Act violation); interference with Plaintiff filing for the primary election; and, (D)  Hatch Act Violations, USC 7323 and 7324 mostly, by the score, knowingly and intentionally done, while almost bragging openly about them.  Each of these violations is part of the file with This Court; yet, The Court and the Republican Party, and SCSOS failed to address them. 

 

SOS South Carolina has no standing in this case currently as SOS failed to answer charges within the 60 day time frame allowed by Rule of Procedure 12.  The Court, wrongly, allowed SOS to submit a Motion and honored that Motion at a much later date.  It was wrong (prejudicial?) of The Court to favor defendants; additionally, (E) The Court failed to acknowledge Plaintiff Motions  to receive:  $1,600,000.00 in financial damages, plus punitive financial damages, court costs, and other financial damages thought proper/reasonable by the jury, (RICO); and (F) The Court failed to honor Plaintiff’s trial by jury Motion; and, (G) his change of venue Motion -  to another Court, away from the Southern District Court, Columbia, South Carolina, has been ignored by The Court.  

  1. A government of South Carolina State Board of Elections member(s) is guilty of criminal and civil violations and illegal conspiracy and extortion, and bribery, and manipulation of deadline dates to influence a national election, and innumerable additional violations of the Hatch Act: using government owned travel cards, automobiles, computers, personnel, government owned and/or privately owned computers to promote a partisan political candidate, violating ethical standards, engaging in political activity while on duty and/or in a government building, soliciting and receiving political contributions, using official authority and influence to interfere with a national election, and with Republican Party of South Carolina in successful combined effort to limit who gets onto the primary ballot in South Carolina, to include intentional delays in administrating affairs of this “expedited” action.  By gross dereliction of duty, perhaps intentional, the Federal Bureau of Investigation likewise is guilty of violating the Hatch Act.

 

No USA citizen has any recourse at law when deceit, deception, dishonesty and other behavioral characteristics cited here exist if ANY FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JOINS AND/OR SUPPOTS THE CORRUPTION INSTEAD OF STOPPING IT!

  1. RICO violations/activities occurred as well (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations), each of which carries triple financial damages to which Plaintiff is entitled compensation.  More precise documentation exists and is part of this case and will be presented to the jury as soon as possible.

 

  1. By controlling who gets onto the ballot, the South Carolina Republican Party and the South Carolina State Board of Elections conspire successfully to control all persons permitted to get elected, another Hatch Act violation.  Independent thinkers like Donald Trump and Thomas Coyne, for example, are declared frivolous by definition, one’s considered by integrity-challenged appointed lawyers  sitting in their appointed offices in their official steel-gated government buildings as having no chance whatsoever of proving their case and getting elected, but our system of “justice” does not allow unqualified appointed lawyers to decide who is qualified.  One very well known fact: POTUS Trump proved his case in a landslide election.
  1. Elections are held to allow citizens to determine the eligibility of each candidate, but no person NOT on the ballot is eligible to get elected.  Secretary of State, South Carolina and Republican Party, South Carolina decide illegally and harm society by deciding who is eligible for election.  Wrongly, voters must choose between the least undesirable of the two (D or R) undesirable persons permitted by South Carolina government and South Carolina Republican Party onto the ballot. 

 

  1. Activity directed toward the success or failure of a political party, or candidate of partisan political office (Plaintiff Coyne), is in violation of the Hatch Act. Both defendants engaged in partisan (heavily financial) political activity to damage financially and halt Plaintiff.
  1. One need not be a citizen and/or registered voter in a state to be a candidate in a primary election for national public office, the office of POTUS, in that state.  Republican Party of South Carolina appears to have argued otherwise, wrongly,

 

  1. Plaintiff requested “expedited” service, in person, when filing this suit in Columbia, South Carolina on September 10, 2015 and appears to have received nothing other than planned delays by both (2) defendants,  and  by The Court.  This case is not/has not been “expedited” as of today’s date:  June 20, 2017;
  1. Each of six (6) South Carolina Board of Elections members are appointed personally by South Carolina Secretary of State who may or may not receive all or part of the financial kick-back of $20,000 per POTUS candidate, S.C. Board of Elections said.  It is the returned portion from the $40,000 the candidate is required by SCBE persons to pay.  Plaintiff questions concerning this matter remain unanswered.  The FBI knows and contributes to Hatch Act violation secrecy by not announcing its findings.  This FBI secrecy condition shall change at the trial by jury;

 

  1. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has full and complete knowledge of criminal and civil violations cited here, and more, but continue their failure to investigate.  South Carolina elected and appointed government “officials” continue to run amuck, a condition harmful to Plaintiff financially, and no meaningful legal cases appear to exist concerning the matter. 

Dereliction of duty is standard operating procedure in this most serious of serious federal elections for POTUS, but totally, continually and fully informed FBI allowed no subpoenas or warrants to be issued, no federal grand jury to be formed/called, allowed “lost” evidence to occur, intentional time lags/lapses to exist, destruction of evidence to occur, personnel movement through retirement, death or resignation to allow otherwise key witnesses to disappear, no searches were made that might provide evidence, no seizures of evidence, computers or otherwise, and FBI did not serve ANY witnesses, did not record any testimony, but allowed defendants to conspire, plot and plan with one another, thereby causing FBI to become part of the problem in this SOS/RPSC case.  It appears FBI may have left undone enough evidence as needed to allow corrupt elected and appointed government persons to continue criminal and uncivil activities, UNLESS A Federal District Court ACTS PROPERLY THIS TIME!

  1. The poll taxes for South Carolina government election services, may not exist technically and may not have been paid by anyone because Bill Clinton’s notion of the law is allowed to prevail:  “The law depends upon what one’s definition of the word is, is.”  Call the poll tax something else, a donation, perhaps, and a poll tax does not exist.  A donation exists!

 

Poll taxes currently are,  by definition in South Carolina, a donation from a tax-exempt political party to a State government who is free to use the money (extortion: illegally obtained) as it sees fit.  Plaintiff was not required to pay the 40,000 in taxes to get his name on the ballot; instead, Plaintiff is required to pay The Republican Party $40,000 which, in turn, decides by agreement, by conspiracy, to share its new wealth with government by donating $20,000 to it.  The illegal and unethical contract between Republican Party and SOS, South Carolina, is for government illegally to require $40,000 to be paid by Plaintiff directly to tax-exempt Republican Party, subsequent to which Republican Party makes immediately a contribution of $20,000 to the State of South Carolina to defray operation of the poll costs associated with the election, but it is not a poll tax, by definition?

The key to this entire fraudulent arrangement is the notarized statement of support for leadership to the Party.  The written “support” of leadership makes Plaintiff contribution to Party appear voluntary.  No tax is paid.  No invoices are submitted.  It is a perfect tax fraud and politically corrupt explanation.   

The scheme is to make it appear the Republican Party, quite simply, donates, shares its wealth ($20,000) received from a happy member of its organization who willingly gave to the cause, to the Party ($40,000). 

This Republican Party/State of South Carolina procedure is criminal and in total violation of the letter and spirit of The Hatch Act.  No government employee other than the President and Vice President of the USA may demand that money be “donated” to a tax exempt organization for the purpose of affecting the outcome of a partisan election, a crucial national election in this case. 

Being a criminal offense the Federal Bureau of Investigation needs to say so, not become part of it, and prosecute all guilty parties.  FBI itself is guilty of violating the Hatch Act, by failing to do its job.  FBI aids and abets corrupt politicians in South Carolina by concealing and not revealing their activities.  FBI has a total MONOPOLY on prosecuting crimes and criminals.  When FBI fails to investigate and act upon its findings no citizen has any alternative choice for someone, somewhere to rid the nation of crime and criminals.   By its inaction and dereliction of duty in 2016 citizens found themselves with a totally rigged Republican Party South Carolina primary election in 2016. (Reminder:  The Democrat Partybehaves in like manner). Government/Party corruption, using The Hatch At presided over the affair aided and abetted by FBI and Court inaction!  Was it intentional?  We must investigate further, and report.

THE sole reason for the mandated signed, notarized pledge of allegiance from POTUS candidates to Republican Leadership in this South Carolina case is to make the initial payment ($40,000) appear as a normal, generous stipend from one happy Party member to his Party; The sole reason for the mandated $20,000 kick-back is to support financially corrupt life-long, can’t- get- them- out- of- office professional politicians, and, AS IMPORTANT, to control who is permitted onto the ballot.  Throughout it all, of course, THE CASH FLOW is a poll tax! 

Government believes it cannot collect poll taxes openly from voters in South Carolina, but government can and does obtain the same result by controlling who will be on the ballot.  Only a person on the ballot gets elected!  Each “Party” in S. C. does all it can to control each candidate.  Entry onto the ballot is forbidden by each “Party” (D + R) for every person, for any person, considered uncontrollable by the Party, Plaintiff and the democratic system is dammed! 

A poll tax on candidates is every bit as invalid, illegal and in total violation of the 14th Amendment as a poll tax on voters.  Both taxes have the same harmful, illegal unconstitutional result: citizens selecting from the most undesirable insider hand-picked and politically controlled candidate.

“The Court” is in position to stop this corruption now!  An honorable FBI would help.  Has The Court courage enough to do so is the question?  Does The Court understand the problem?  We are at war; we are losing.  The enemy is within.  Is The Court a soldier for the enemy within, or the knight in shining armor charging on a high horse into the enemy - that is the critical, crucial and honest question raised by Plaintiff in this legal action?

What is the honest answer?
ACTION

The alleged “Statement of the Facts” presented by Republican Party, South Carolina misses the point, fails to reveal MOST OF THE RELEVANT FACTS, a sophomoric effort at best, intentionally misleading at worse.  The poll tax is a problem, of course, but it is NOT and never was the REAL problem, nor is it the ONLY problem!  The real problem is control over admission to the ballot for qualified persons, for persons not hand-picked by Party leaders. No one gets elected if s/he is not on the ballot and Republican Party/SOS South Carolina blocks entry to the ballot consistently by using Hatch Act violations for anyone (Blacks included) not controllable by them.

A poll tax that is small and limited remains a poll tax.  A poll tax on candidates and not on voters may not yet have been challenged in court, but that poll tax on candidates is being challenged here and now!  Plaintiff challenges the authority of any state to charge a poll tax on candidates as is being done in South Carolina.

Violations of the Hatch Act by Republican Party South Carolina and SOS South Carolina deprived Plaintiff, from the state of  Ohio, his constitutional right to compete for the office of POTUS, and denied him, discriminated against him, because he is from the state of Ohio. Defendants harmed Plaintiff financially by denying him his right to compete to earn $1,600,000, plus other benefits.  This is the claim upon which financial relief must be granted. 

After South Carolina Plaintiff  had a poll tax to pay in Alabama ($27,000), then Arkansas and so on; if Defendant Party were correct in that Plaintiff would be required to be a registered voter in South Carolina and in each of our 50 states, such a childish argument by Republican Party would be considered  frivolous by any jury, of course.  Were Ben Carson and others on stages at the 2016 Primary Republican Party event voting and registered to vote in each state where they ran for office?  What a childish argument!

No attacks have been made by Plaintiff on the GOP as charged by Defendant, except to the extent that certain members, some of whom may be lawyers, of  the GOP South Carolina may be heavily criminally involved in violating the Hatch Act.

These are genuine issues, genuine facts in this “Response” and have been ignored by both defendants, and by The Court.  The facts presented here (above) affect the outcome of the suit.  Most certainly, it is not irrelevant or unnecessary to call attention to and ask that one understand this fact:  intentional violations of The Hatch Act are the issue!  No jury will find in favor of Defendant(s) the financial conspiracy and outright fraud used to win election(s). 

THE ISSUE HEREIS THE HATCH ACT VIOLATION(S) AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH DEFENDANTS HAVE GONE TO COVER IT UP.  Major criminality exists in this case and cannot be ignored or minimized.  Criminal aspects are THE factor causing civil issues, civil unrest, and racial problems in this country, of which there are many.

Plaintiff’s arguments here withstand legal scrutiny with ease and shall succeed on the merits.  Ask the jury!  Any jury!  The right to vote is not conditioned upon payment of a poll tax in South Carolina, but the right to appear on the ballot is conditioned upon making a serious, mandated, required donation to a political party who, in turn, pays government to manage the polls,  a poll tax, payment consistent upon managing of the polls on Election Day. No jury will accept the South Carolina’s method of deceit in how government extracts $20,000 from each candidate with no accounting of who gets the money. SCSEB had to manage the polls anyway, with or without the “extra” money.

Defendant Republican Party says Plaintiff is financially able to pay the extortion and bribery - obtained fees and so he should pay them, fees that assist Lesley Graham and fifteen or so other Republican Party regulars on the stage in competition with Plaintiff for POTUS.  Sorry, but no!  Defendant Republican Party appears to assume Plaintiff is able to handle manipulated deadline dates for the Primary Election as well (Plaintiff was given less than 24 hours, to show up; to pay up), but Republican Party Defendant suggestions of how and why Plaintiff should handle innumerable unconsciously expensive totally criminal SOS/Republican Party Hatch Act violations are conspicuous by their absence.

This response by Plaintiff is more than “adequate” and requires issuance by The Court of “Summary Judgment” in favor of Plaintiff.

Assuming The Court is permitted by law to do so, The Court is to consider this presentation (A) a formal Motion and (B) a response: 

Plaintiff moves he be granted “Summary Judgment” in this case with initial financial payment by Defendants (2) to Plaintiff in the amount of $1.6 million for cited financial damages.  Court costs plus whatever punitive damages The Court considers reasonable are in order as well.  RICO violations exist in very large numbers.  Plaintiff is entitled to share in those triple financial damages.

Republican Party Defendant and SOS South Carolina Defendant are in bed together, and, perhaps, with The Court, conspiring together, they are working together to make money and to control access to the ballot through planned violations of The Hatch Act as demonstrated clearly in this “Response.”  Worse yet for Defendant Republican Party, SOS South Carolina Defendant has NO legitimate legal standing in this case.  How does any Court legitimately grant “Summary Judgment” to one-half of a criminal AND civil complaint?   One way, wrongly, is to excuse the Defendant with no notice or activity being permitted by Plaintiff and do so as quietly as possible?

If the Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. dismissed the SCSOS as party Defendant to this action on September 29, 2016, as claimed by Defendant South Carolina Republican Party, Plaintiff makes two points:  (1) Anderson did so wrongly; and, (2) Plaintiff was NOT informed or given ANY opportunity to respond or otherwise be involved.  Defendant SCSOS MISSED, FAILED to respond within 60 days as ordered by The Anderson Court on 9/15/2015; and, SCSOS MISSED, FAILED to provide any response within the 60 days required by Civil Rule of Procedure 12, a “Rule” required of Plaintiff.  SCSOS received very special treatment, wrongly, illegally, immorally and unethically from The Court?

Clearly, Plaintiff has won this case.  Efforts to find legal language documenting why he might not have won cannot stand muster with: (1) any jury, (2) a legitimate appellate court (3) the U. S. Supreme Court, or (4) Plaintiff. 

Plaintiff is a reasonable person, seemingly defrauded at every turn in South Carolina.  He is and has been stonewalled from the outset, 9/15/2015.  Plaintiff has been badly damaged financially by Hatch Act violations.  Defendant Republican Party has refused to accept calls; refused to answer messages from Plaintiff’s calls; refused to make calls.  

Defendant SCSOS stonewalled totally and then appears to have made a highly questionable and unannounced side-bar deal with The Judge, many months ago, to get excused from the law suit, even though evidence suggests SOS may be guilty, might even end up in a South Carolina jail.  

Defendant Republican Party is about to receive a “Summary Judgment” if this Plaintiff “response” is considered inadequate, however defined, by the Republican Party Defendant and/or The Court.  What ‘’justice” is that?

What is a normal, hard-working, honest Oho citizen to do if The Court fails to consider the facts in an honest and truthful manner, with dignity, discipline, ethics, with integrity? 

Plaintiff knows the honest answer but does not like it!

Written this 20th day of
June, 2017 in Bath,
Ohio 44333

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D.,
2016 Candidate for POTUS
______________________________________________________________________________

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Thomas Joseph Coyne does hereby certify that this date, June 20, 2017 as Plaintiff in this case 3:15-cv-3779-JFA-SVH, by U.S. Postal Service, this MOTION to Respond to the Order received from Magistrate Judge Hodges, written by him/her on 06/14/2017, has been sent to the Clerk of Court in Columbia, S. C., and to the following persons/organizations: 

  1. Alphonso Norris, FBI. Special Agent in Charge, 151 W. Park Blvd., Columbia, South Carolina 29201; also, Assistant Special Agent, Douglas Hemminghaus; and, Chief Division Counsel, Donald A. Wood.
  2. FBI, Director, 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 20535-0001; also, Monique A. Bookstein, FBI Ombudsman; and, Patrick W. Kelley, FBI Integrity Compliance Officer.
  3.  Robert Johnson, FBI, Special Agent in Charge, 3311 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203.
  4. Mark Hammond, SOS, South Carolina

1205 Pendleton St. # 525.
 Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Bowers Law Office

P. O. Box 50549
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Terry L. Wooten, Chief

U. S. District Judge
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. South Carolina Republican Party

Office of Nat Moore
1913 Marion Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. U. S. Attorney for South Carolina

1441 Main Street, # 500
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Office of Governor

1205 Pendleton St.
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. OTHER(S)

______________________________________________________________________________

_________________________

Commentary of May 25, 2017:  The “Quantitative Easing” Sham: “The Fed’s” Contribution to World Wide Financial Collapse"

“Quantitative Easing” (QE) is the meaningless name given to low interest rates by a politically dictated policy to our formally “Independent” Federal Reserve System.  Little or no independence exists; worse yet, lack of independence from fiscal authorities has existed heavily since POTUS George Bush #41.  Not since the Harry S. Truman administration has The Fed been independent!

QE, a relatively new mandatory monetary policy in modern America, is designed and implemented to allow the central bank (The Fed) to create large and increasingly larger, quantities of money. QE lowers interest rates allowing government spending to expand without interruption, allows commercial banks to make personal consumption and small business loans banks otherwise would not make; also, the huge quantity of money in circulation adversely affects its quality; too much money in circulation harms the economy, perhaps beyond repair.   

QE is the same error in judgment pursued with vigor by the Confederate states during our Civil War and, arguably, the primary cause of Confederacy defeat.  An excess quantity of money was in circulation at that time.  The normal result occurred:  Money became worthless; worse yet, the longer a nation pursues QE (ruining the quality of its money) the shorter the time until extinction of the nation financially.  Venezuela took the rapid transit, quick train for example.  Thankfully, the USA is riding a Greyhound bus!

QE ruins money markets (T Bills, short-term notes) and capital markets (stocks, bonds) by lowering interest rates to 0.001%, or lower. Lower than zero, negative interest rates, means senior citizens and others have to pay the bank to hold their money instead of getting paid by the bank for using the money.  No need exists for any financial intermediary to pay for the use of QE money, the price of which is expressed as the interest rate, when the bank cannot find any borrowers for the huge, excess quantity of money on hand, on reserve.

Zero interest rates are music to the ears of all life-long, career politicians as the so-called 'debt limit' is not reached as quickly.  With The Fed buying government bonds the money supply expands further while households pay higher prices for consumer goods.  Government spending expands on a non-stop basis! Our debt gets further beyond control!

QE allowed transfer of funds (2008) to Lehman Brothers and Bear-Stearns from U.S. taxpayers after which crooked politicians collected many hundreds of thousands of dollars each as payment for a 20 minute “speech” attended by no one.  Uncommonly weak appointed leadership at “our” Monetary Authority aided and abetted this legalized theft; additionally, of major importance, passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, signed 11/21/1999, by Bill Clinton caused total financial ruination of the EU, and beyond.!  These thefts: an important and as yet unnoticed part of the Obama/Soetoro legacy.

Falsely, QE is “sold” to citizens as policy destined to increase net new business investment, causing net new employment to expand, but new investment is never a function of the interest rate.  The marginal efficiency of capital determines the extent to which new jobs are created! The interesst does not! 

____________________

REMINDER (May 7, 2017): 

If you are interested in buying and/or selling a business you may want Coyne & Associates, Inc. to determine a proper value of the business being bought or sold.  In addition to our highly successful money management for many decades (since 1967), business valuations are done well, both domestic and foreign. 

We are very good at what we do!  We calculate the value of any firm. Additionally, with client best-interest(s) at heart, upon request, we negotiate acquisition and/or sale of the business. Contact: tom@coyne-assoc.com

___________________

North Korea:  Unsustainable! (April 30, 2017) © Thomas Joseph Coyne

A truism is an undeniable truth.  Regardless of whether you are socialist/communist or (1) price system oriented, (2) competitive minded, and/or (3) freedom-loving capitalist the truth is   North Korea is unsustainable: a truism.

Truism #1: The “Conflict” in North Korea started militarily in June, 1950.  N. Korea invaded South Korea.  USA POTUS Harry S. Truman engaged N. Koreans militarily.  After early American success China crossed the Yalu River and swarmed like insects crawling up a wounded American arm.  An “Armistice” (cease fire) became effective July 27, 1953 at 10:00 PM;

Truism #2 USA POTUS Eisenhower, Nixon, Carter, Clinton, Obama did nothing about intransigent N. Korea other than “kick the can down the road” landing it on the desk of POTUS Trump;

Truism #3: President Trump with approximately 100 days in office should have solved this sixty-sever (67) year old problem by now, according to our Fake News experts;

Truism #4:  Democrat Party and socialist-oriented news media in America and throughout the world reveal a definite anti-American, un-American attitude and posture towards the office of POTUS Trump, our Commander-in-Chief.  Former Commander's-in-Chief had a government cadre ready to help; however, current members of our as yet un-drained swamp of government “officials” work relentlessly to cause failure of POTUS & country. Our allies (Philippines, Guam, Japan, and South Korea) expect and deserve better.  Treasonous persons must be removed from positions of obstruction.  Retain critical government personnel only.  All others must go! If media claims a government shut-down exists, so be it.  Handling the Korean situation is more important.  Millions of women and children shall be damaged for life otherwise!  Many American media personnel and government employees are seditious, treasonous.  They must be removed at once.

Truism #6:  These unsustainable facts must be addressed immediately if we are to unite and handle successfully the current N. Korea problem, and its aftermath.  The N. Korean dictator has promised a very bloody confrontation.  This very young man has no experience at war. None! The war he seeks will be a total disaster for him and many, many young innocent Koreans who look to him for food and security.  Sad!    

N. Korea says it will send a combat ready infantry of 500,000 young women against S. Korean/American forces.  (A) We must focus now on how to handle hundreds of thousands of dead bodies; (B) Cities, towns and villages shall have infrastructure destroyed and shall need replacement. (C) who is responsible, (D) who will pay for removal/reconstruction? (E) regarding millions of persons not killed or dismembered who will house, clothe, feed, educate and otherwise provide basic necessities of life for them?  (F) Where? (G) USA is expected to pay for all of this, again, similar to the Marshall Plan after Germany’s second destructive effort to socialize Europe?  I think not!

Thomas Joseph Coyne, 2016 POTUS candidate,
Republican Party Primary, Criminally Rigged, So. Carolina.
(C/A No. 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH. Extortion;
Bribery; Hatch Act violations; Manipulated Deadline
Dates, Gross Fed. District Court/Judge Misconduct).

____________________

Advertising suggestion made at 5:25 PM, 4/ 24, 2017, for firms such as Chic-fil-la, and others, who sell chicken sandwiches and similar.  McDonald’s fits nicely into this suggestion as well:  ‘We chicken ain’t got no beef”. This verbiage is available to your firm for advertising purposes. FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED! www.coyne-assoc.com © Thomas Joseph Coyne

____________________

April 22, 2017 The Decline and Fatal Fall of Political Parties (copyright)

Look at what is happening throughout Europe, Asia, Africa and the USA: Former respect, if any, for "your" favorite Political Party is Dead or Drying before your eyes! What happened?

Populations throughout the world may have thought, wrongly, "their" political Party worked on behalf of citizens, voters; "their" party could be trusted to pursue policies and procedures (laws) helpful to the population at large but, importantly, the Political Party (D or R in USA) had the best interest of everyday citizens at heart in all legislation, all political activity. Sadly, the everyday citizen in each population throughout the world has learned finally s/he believed wrongly. The everyday citizen has come to know his/her Political Party has no interest in him/her! Members of each Politicasl Party pledge allegiance first and foremost to the "head" or "leader" of the Party while ignoring the interests of persons who voted to put him/her in office. Politicialns do not function on behalf of "We the People"! No political party can be trusted!

Politicians work tirelessly to gain and retain public office primarily for the benefits they can accrue to and for themselves. Any sembelance of improvement in the lives of ordinary citizens is happenstance, unintended. "Milk the system to the maximum level possible before getting caught" is the solemn pledge each politican makes to him/herself. Once caught: lie! Politicians of every stripe have a "License to Lie." This sorry condition exists not only in elected public office but in appointed positions as well. This condition exists worldwide: Alleged "Leadership" at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is corrupt, and at the World Bank. The Bank of the Vatican and "Curiia," the ruling body of the Roman Catholic Church, according to Pope Francis is corrupt through and through. And Hillary and Bill and Chelsea Clinton and their 'family' Foundation with its tens of millions of dollars in paid funds needed to buy political favors from U. S. Senators and House members is well known for lack of truthfulnes, discipline, dignity or ethical behavior.

Solution to this deceit, deception and dishonesty is at hand. Populations everywhere are learning NOT to reelect any person who has been unable after 10-12 years in office to function honestly. People know now to elect ONLY totally INDEPENDENT persons, people who have refused to vote as instructed by political Party leaders. The Party "leader" is also a lobbyist and will make additinal income from his/hser unethical, illegal, illicit behavior by selling access to the person(s) he helped (allegedly) to elect.

The Republican Party Primary Election in South Carolina, 2016, was knowingly, willingly, intentionally involved with unpunished criminal as well as unpunished civil violations. Extortion existed ($680,000 estimated dollars paid), bribery existed ($340,000 estimated dollars paid), manipulation of deadline dates for participation in the primary was rigged to allow only 'insider' activity so as to allow someone like John Kasich to win, federal Hatch Act (1939) violations by the score were commonplace and, of course, unpunished. "Our" Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is and since 2015 (at least one year before the election) was well aware but has been told by politicians to overlook everything? FBI in Pittsburgh, Pa., knows and at least since 2004 knew precisely how it works and overlooked everything, and becasuse politicinas tells and told FBI to do so. Republican Party of South Carolina and Secretary of State of South Carolina, and State Election Board of South Carolina each have been and are involved with this illegal civil and criminal activity: each benefited financially and otherwise because of it. Terry L. Wooten, Chief, U.S. District Judge, Columbia; also, the Office of Governor, 1205 Pendleton St., Columbia, S.C. 29201 are/were involved.

What happened? The Preamble of the Constitution guarantees liberty and justice for all, but we have no "Department of Justice", only a "Department of Politically Manipulated Legal Affairs." How many political Party "leaders" have become multi-millionaires because of this criminal activity; how many Black/white/other innocent "criminals" are wasting away in prison because of it. See U. S. Federal District Court, District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, C/A No. 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH. PLAINTIFF COYNE NEEDS AND SEEKS HELP WITH THIS CASE. Plaintiff Coyne's Motions in court have been ignored by The Court, such as Motions for: (1) a trial by jury; (2) a change of venue; and, (3) $1,600,000 in actual damages, plus punitive damages and costs.

May God Please Bless America!

Tom Coyne

___________________

March 13, 2017 A New Broom Commentary

All new brooms sweep clean.

In Washington, D. C. we have a new broom capability, one not in existence since before the Presidency of Woodrow Wilson; most certainly, not since the so-called "New Deal" and the days of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his socialist friends. POTUS Trump is in position to sweep the nation with a clean broom, removing ALL unnecessary persons, elected and appointed, all out-dated Agencies, and all 'commissions' and advisory positions not critical to continued growth in terms of employment, output and income within the USA.

Everyday Russians are not our enemy, have never been our enemy! When the Soviet Union existed (USSR) Russia led that 15 nation bloc of nations and its Communist leaders might correctly have been identified as "enemy," but not today's everyday Russians in Moscow and St. Petersburg and elsewhere throughout Russia. Under Communist dictaorship some years ago when our embassy was built Russia "bugged" it throughout, but the USSR is gone, died on December 25, 1991. USSR NO LONGER EXISTS! Vladimir Putin might appear to want a revision of Communisst rule but it most likely will not occur. Putin might like to revise all or some of Communist rule, but the people of Russia care nothing for it currently - somewhat like current popularity ratings of Hillary and Bill resulting from the Democrat Party election disaster of November 8, 2016 in the USA? Besides, Russia lies currently in financial ruin, incapable of major montary outlays. Russia has NO legitimate monetary system, no Federal Reserve System similar to ours in the USA and, seemingly, knows not how to get one.

Remember as well: We are a nation and all nations have borders. Even the 109 acre Vatican City (nation) in Rome, Italy, created by grant from Italian dictator Benito Mussolini in 1929, in exchange for Church neutrality during World War II for Benito and Adolph, as part of the Lateran Pact (Treaty), has a border patroled by Swiss guards. Had Pope Pius XII advised Christian German soldiers and Christian Italian soldiers it is a sin to kill innocent Christians in Poland (September 1, 1939), the probability is high that considerably less than the 60 million persons would have been killed in War II; in fact, there may have beeen no war. POTUS must control and protect our borders (1) from persons with contagious disease(s), (2) from persons who refuse to allow others to worship God as s/he sees fit, (3) from fear created by truly uncommonly evil persons. Mr. Trump is precisely the man to do these things, (4) to eliminate ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, (5) and more! Please give him a chance, close ranks and defeat LEGITIMATE enemies of this nation, persons and groups such as Muslim extremist brain-washed young suicide bombers, and similar. The people of Russia are not our enemy! The people of Russia were enslaved before 12/25/1991, but now are free. Boris Yeltzin did that! As with free Amrican Blacks, once you have been a slave you will NEVER again be a slave. Thank God!

Remember: We are at war and we are losing. If we focus on the correct problem(s) we can solve it - as we have done always in our history - and will do again, but only if we unite.

____________________

IMPORTANT RECENT DEVELOPMENT AS OF YESTERDAY, MARCH 9, 2017. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S 1/2 BROTHER FROM KENYA ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOLLOWING IS THE AUTHENTIC BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF HIS 1/2 BROTHER, BARACK. THIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN ON THIS THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE WEB PAGE IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER SINCE JUNE 10, 2010. ALL APPOINTMENTS AND ORDERS MADE BY THIS IMPOSTER PRESIDENT, Obama, MUST BE NULLIFIED IMMEDIATELY; MOST ESPECIALLY, HIS U. S. SUPREME COURT APPOINTMENTS MUST BE CANCELED.

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA; Ph.D., Candidate for office of POTUS 2016, asks you to SCROLL DOWN approximately 20 OR SO PAGES AND SEE THE WRITE-UP/BACKGROUND CONCERNING Obama's legitimate birth certificate.

U. S. District Court, Columbia, South Carolina aided and abetted continued fraud associated with this Obama birth certificate by denying entry of Thomas Joseph Coyne onto the Republican Party Primary Election ballot in South Carolina in 2016. The Court was well aware of Coyne's backgound and of his intent to produce this and numerous other documents during the Republican Primary Election of 2016 debate(s) to which he was denied entry for refusal to pay extortoin ($40,000.00) upon demand, to include bribes ($20,000.00) demanded by S. C. government officials (South Carolina State Election Board), each of whom is and was appointed personally by S. C. Secretary of State.

U. S. District Court, S. C. violated Coyne's 1st, 14th and 24th Amendment rights, among other wrongs, such as ignoring Republican Party of South Carolina's admitted conspiracy with S. C. government extortion, government bribery, government wide-spread violations of The Hatch Act (1939) in South Carolina's announced continuing effort to aid the Republican Party of South Carolina and the Secretary of State's office of South Carolina. Additionally U. S. District Court ignored acknowledgment by S. C. government of demand that Coyne sign a notarized pledge of allegiance to the Head of The Republican Party, and provide it overnight accompanied with his cash of $40,000, or certified check of same amount. It was an overnight demand and the deadline for filing was changed while he was on the phone (9/09/15) from 9/30/2015 to 9/10/2016, an immediate 20 day manipulation (reduction) of deadline date.

The Coyne case: 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH remains unresolved as of this writing, 3/10/2017, with no reasonable end in sight. Motions filed have been ignored. The behavior of The District Court of South Carolina in this case ignored expeditious treatment as requested when suit was filed by Coyne (Plaintiff) on September 15, 2015. Intentional District Court-assisted delays and meaningful other assistance was and is provided to defendants. This despicable Court behavior was and is criminal, treason!

The Republican Party Primary Election, 2016, in South Carolina was a TOTALLY RIGGED election.

  1. The Obama Birth Certificate. The following is a copy of the authentic birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama II, a/k/a Barry Soetoro for approximately 26 of his 52 years on earth. This copy has appeared on this web page in years past, first having been supplied to Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., on June 10, 2010.  This birth certificate arrived unannounced and was sent by a person I have never met.  He assures me it was obtained by him from the USA’s Secret Service.  Most likely, s/he is a former Secret Service employee. This certificate appeared at one time also on the “Hour of Power” web page, a church service of substance I am assured.  The point:  When combined with other totally believable sources, I consider this certificate authentic.  To test authenticity is easy:  get a foot print of Barack Hussein Obama II, known for approximately 26 years of his life as Barry Soetoro.

http://www.coyne-assoc.com/index_clip_image002.jpg
http://www.coyne-assoc.com/index_clip_image002_0000.jpg
SOURCE:  www.coyne-assoc.com

The Ann Dunham signed registration form for Barack Hussein Obama II elementary school entry as a Muslim student at the St. Francis of Assisi Roman Catholic Elementary School, Jakarta, Indonesia, elementary school pictures and other confirmations plus and considerable detail about his mother, Ann Dunham, his Grandmother, Madelyn exist and need to be understood.  President Obama’s is part and parcel of the largest fraud perpetrated ever on the American people, and upon people from all corners of the earth.  Ann Dunham’s principal employment was with the USA’s CIA at the time, the primary source of this birth certificate.  The Court may take solace in knowledge that none of this information was permitted to be presented by Plaintiff Coyne during the 2016 Republican Primary election debates.  Otherwise, the nation and world would have a different candidate, Plaintiff Coyne, leading the polls.  The Anderson Order has contributed to denial of badly needed information to a national audience. It was wrong of the Court to do so.  Judge Anderson should please move now to correct that wrong.

____________________________________________________

Commentary of March 1, 2017:  RUSSIA/USSR   -   © Thomas Joseph Coyne

The Soviet Union failed, financially and otherwise with the quietest of deaths on December 25, 1991. (footnote 1). Russia became an independent stand-alone state, abolishing the former Union of Soviet Socialist States (USSR) which had consisted of 15 separate nations:  Armenia, Azerbaijan; Belarus; Estonia; Georgia; Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.  Until its demise USSR had been a force of some substance spreading across thirteen time zones (13).  Socialism failed, as it does everywhere. It was a peaceful dissolution No one in any of fifteen republics got shot; no one was fearful of getting shot.  NOTE: OUR USA FAKE NEWS MEDIA FAILED TO TELL US!

Russia continued as center of employment, output and income, plus the center of political life for Russian citizens.  Some persons argue currently Vladimir Putin may be attempting to reconstruct the Soviet empire, with Belarus being the only former USSR satellite even considering going backward in this manner.  Reconstruction of the USSR will not occur!   I have visited Minsk, Belarus and consider it impossible.(footnote 2).  

Growing-up during World War II and its aftermath, as with many U. S. citizens I remember the horrible but true stories of Lenin and Stalin and the tens of millions of Russians and other persons these two persons had unelected communist authorities kill. That duo is long gone!  That situation no longer exists; in fact, since at least December 25, 1991 no Russian communist official has threatened publicly to “bury us” as did Khrushcev while pounding his shoe on the desk to get attention on American soil in New York City at the United Nations building.

We in the United States need friends, not enemies!  Establishing better relations with Russia is good for the USA, not harmful.  Unless by its actions towards us Russia proves otherwise we need to encourage, applaud actually, President Donald Trump and his administrative persons as they do what they can to assure peaceful, but heavily monitored, relations with Russia.  Be cooperative but cautious!  I have been to Moscow and Leningrad (correctly renamed St. Petersburg), other cities, met many persons in academic and business and government and can attest to their kindness, willingness and friendliness.   

The former USSR began after the Russian revolution and civil war, 1917.  Gorbachev rule began in 1985, initially with iron fist, but softened.  He created later conditions conducive to ending the totalitarian state.  Gorbachev turned everything over to Boris Yeltzin in 1991 subsequent to which we have had no major problems with Russia.  The turnover was without incident and it happened almost twenty-six years ago (26).    Boris Yeltzin sought me out in Moscow, expressing his good wishes (I did NOT seek him out). The people in Riga, Lativa with whom I have visited, likewise, are truly wonderful. The time has come.  THE time is now! We must alter significantly our thinking and actions towards the people of Russia. President Trump can handle this matter with ease!
 
Everyday Russians are just like everyday Americans met on the street or on campus, or at a movie, in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and elsewhere.  Try it!  You’ll like it!

Tom Coyne


(1) Not Christmas Day; Christmas Day is January 20 in Russia.

(2) Russia’s errorneous acquisition of Ukraine may cause this kind of thinking.

____________________

February 14, 2017:  Commentary Regarding North Korea

From March to July 27, 1953, and beyond, as part of my Korean War effort, I spent too much time and effort north of the 38th parallel, but in the process, and since that time, I have met and studied with one or more citizen from N. Korea.  What I have learned includes this fact:  The everyday N. Korean population lives in constant fear and hunger and cold while military and political leaders live in relative luxury.  We know or should by now have the names and locations of each member of this privileged N. Korean leadership group. 

The solution to the problem in N. Korea costs no lives and relatively little money, it is:  Freeze the debit, credit, checking and all other bank accounts for each member of the North Korean political elite.

We are expert in our knowledge of banking and finance and have the necessary connections in this country and abroad to cause North Korean leadership, on an individual and personal basis, to be without any money with which to buy anything.

Conduct this necessary banking freeze of individual financial accounts of leadership persons while simultaneously using the rudiments of President Harry S. Truman’s air-lift in East Berlin:  Bomb North Korean cities and villages with food stuffs (candy, and selected clothing items, such as James/Jordon basketball shoes, and other ‘necessities’ of middle-class life to the N. Korean population) not war-like bombs, of course, bombs of kindness and support.  This procedure will help the N. Korean population understand the necessity and huge advantage to family, friends and country of taking out the current leadership, in one way or another. 

If North Korea attacks this airborne generosity of air shipments with rifle butts and bayonets, and more, take out any and all attackers, but ONLY the attackers. 

Try it.  You’ll like it!

______________________________

January 25, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
C/A No. 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH

Response to “Scheduling Order” of November 1, 2016 by Magistrate Judge S. V. Hodges to include Motion to Amend
___________________________________________________________________________

Thomas Joseph Coyne,

            Plaintiff,
                
                 VERSUS
           
South Carolina Secretary of State (SCSOS)

                        And

South Carolina Republican Party (SCGOP)

            Defendants
______________________________________________________________________________

 

Plaintiff Coyne filed this action pro se on September 15, 2015 seeking protection of rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States of America, such justice being sought from the Federal District Court, Columbia, South Carolina.  Fairness and ‘justice’ have not been forthcoming,(See footnote). The intent here is to comply with the Hodges “scheduling order” of 11/1/2016, received by U. S. Postal System on 11/7/2016, and Move to Amend Plaintiff Financial damages in the initial complaint; thus:

  1. Amendment of proceedings “shall be filed no later than January 30, 2017” for a case pleading for expedited treatment since September 15, 2015:

 

  1.  Plaintiff was denied access to the ballot for the primary election to the Office of President of the United States of America (POTUS) in South Carolina resulting in financial and other damages to Plaintiff. 

Plaintiff is qualified for the position but due to his refusal to pay extortion, while the other candidates in S.C. paid $680,000.00 as a poll tax/other tax as prerequisite to getting his/her name on the ballot (17 candidates times $40,000.00 each), bribery, $340,000.00 (17 candidates, each required to kick-back to SCSEB 50% of the $40,000.00 per person paid initially to the GOP), and involve himself with illegal, unethical manipulation(s) of registration deadline dates and tolerate violations of the Hatch Act of 1939, as instructed, the office of South Carolina State Election Board (SCSEB) refused to place Plaintiff’s name, Thomas Joseph Coyne, on the ballot, refused to allow Plaintiff to compete for the position of POTUS.  SCSEB told Plaintiff: “pay or no ballot.”  SOS members appoint SCSEB members and profits financially from it, receives part of the kick-back(s); if not, who has the money?  The FBI and/or the IRS know!  

Amendments 1, 14, and 24 violations occurred and alone make this a very serious case!  Poll taxes are illegal, unconstitutional.  What part of the Constitution does The Court fail to understand?  Hatch Act violations by the score existed in the Primary in S.C. along with extortion and bribery.  Plaintiff has been badly damaged by The Court and each defendant being allowed to ignore these financial and criminal and civil irregularities.  No person, Black, white or of color has any chance of success in a South Carolina election(s) when criminal irregularities exist as they did during the Republican Primary election of 2016

The minimum financial damage due Plaintiff is $1,600,000.00 (4 years @ $400,000.00 per year).  Plaintiff Coyne seeks $1,600,000.00 minimum in financial damages.  Plaintiff announced in advance he would seek one term only.    

  1. Fair, reasonable punitive financial damages, travel and other expenses, are due Plaintiff also, as determined by The Court; 

The parties shall file and serve a document identifying name and other contact information even though Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) does not require it.  To the best of my knowledge at this time the FBI offices cited below are included, and Plaintiff reserves the right to call witnesses as needed, as well as the woman from SCSEB who instructed Plaintiff to pay or not be on the ballot.  Her name, address and phone number is not provided at this time.

  1. No motions relating to discovery shall be filed until efforts are attempted to resolve the matter, or words to that effect; however, Attorney for SCGOP failed to return attempted phone calls; attorney for SCSOS failed to comply with the 60 day requirement to answer charges in accordance with Civ. R. P. 12.  Legal counsel for SCSOS has no standing in the case because of this Civ. 12 violation!  The Court gave lawyers for SCSOS standing and admission of new evidence in violation of Civ. 12 anyway, the second Federal District Court act seriously and financially and intentionally detrimental to Plaintiff.

 

Delays in this case have been intentional.  Defendant SCSOS has acted in Bad Faith throughout the proceeding; yet, when it filed a tardy motion (more than 60 days) demanding to be dismissed The Court honored and granted the new motion.  The Court has aided defendants SCGOP and SCSOS by delaying necessary action until the original Plaintiff demand was “moot and there remains no actual controversy because the 2016 South Carolina presidential preference primary in which Plaintiff seeks to participate has already occurred . . . .”  A HUGE controversy exists! 

This is a criminal case (the extortion alone amounted to $680,000 and bribes amounting to $340,000).  (By definition this is serious money to non-political insiders); and, a serious civil case exists as well!  Plaintiff suffered because of the extortion efforts, and bribery efforts, plus other(s) major government employee criminal actions.  This behavior is not considered ‘business as usual’ for a presidential candidate, this Plaintiff!  A Federal District Court must act to correct it inasmuch as the Supreme Court assumes, wrongly, it is not the Court of origin in this case.  (Topic sentence, Article 3 says otherwise).

The original petition may be moot but financial damage(s) done to Plaintiff by The Court and by the Defendants has altered the course of human events, domestically and internationally.  Justice, reasonableness, fairness, ethical behavior, honor, honesty and truthfulness have been avoided in a most un-American and un-Constitutional manner; thus, Plaintiff most reluctantly seeks/requests a different Judge(s) to include a different venue and, of course, if the case goes to court, a trial by jury as requested some time ago.

Respectfully submitted,

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne,
2016 Candidate for POTUS

Written this 25th day
Of January, 2017
In Bath, Ohio, USA
____________________

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Thomas Joseph Coyne does hereby certify that this date, January 25, 2017 as Plaintiff in this case 3:15-cv-3779-JFA-SVH, by U.S. Postal Service, this MOTION to Respond to Scheduling Order received from Magistrate Judge Hodges on 11/7/2016, to include Move to Amend Plaintiff Financial Damages in the initial complaint, has been sent to the Clerk of Court in Columbia, S. C., and to the following persons/organizations: 

  1. Alphonso Norris, FBI. Special Agent in Charge, 151 W. Park Blvd., Columbia, South Carolina 29201; also, Assistant Special Agent, Douglas Hemminghaus; and, Chief Division Counsel, Donald A. Wood.
  2. James B. Comey, FBI, Director, 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 20535-0001; also, Monique A. Bookstein, FBI Ombudsman; and, Patrick W. Kelley, FBI Integrity Compliance Officer .
  3.  Robert Johnson, FBI, Special Agent in Charge, 3311 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203.
  4. Mark Hammond, SOS, South Carolina

1205 Pendleton St. # 525.
 Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Bowers Law Office

P. O. Box 50549
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Terry L. Wooten, Chief

U. S. District Judge
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. South Carolina Republican Party

Office of Nat Moore
1913 Marion Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. U. S. Attorney for South Carolina

1441 Main Street, # 500
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Office of Governor

1205 Pendleton St.
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

  1. Other(s)

___________________________________________________________________________

 

(footnote) Similar “justice” was sought but denied in Federal District Court for northern District West Virginia, Wheeling, when Plaintiff Thomas Joseph Coyne attempted to get his name on the ballot for the office of Governor, West Virginia.  Written request of Petition forms was denied to Plaintiff by Joseph Manchin, West Virginia SOS at the time.  Manchin was seeking the identical office (Governor) at the time.  Manchin won the office of Governor and sits currently as U. S. Senator (D.WV).  Federal District Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. found in favor of Plaintiff from the bench, but reversed himself in his written Order by finding in favor of SOS ManchinFBI, Pittsburgh, Pa., and FBI, Washington, D.C., is being asked by copy of this Motion to provide expert witness testimony concerning what FBI Pittsburgh and/or FBI Washington knows of the Manchin case in WV, and of a continuing and thus far successful political insider effort to keep Plaintiff off any ballot anywhere.  (It may be related somehow to Plaintiff meeting with Boris Yeltzin in Moscow in 1989)?

____________________

EACH PERSON READING THE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL SHOULD PRINT IT OUT, SIGN IT, AND SEND IT TO HIS/HER CONGRESSMAN/SENATOR. HAVE YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS, NEIGHBORS, WORK ASSOCIATES DO THE SAME. SEND IT BY EMAIL, OR WHATEVER WORKS FOR YOU, BUT SEND IT. WE NEED, REPEAT NEED, TERM LIMITS AND NONE CAN BE OBTAINED ABSENT A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT! PLEASE HELP YOURSELF, YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN AND DO THIS THING! DO IT NOW, TODAY! WHETHER YOU ARE REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT OR SOMETHING ELSE YOU BENEFIT FROM THIS AMENDMENT.

TO: Members of Congress of the United States of America

FROM:  Citizen(s) of the United States of America

SUBJECT:  Proposed Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America

Amendment XXVIII

Section 1.  No person shall be elected to the office of the Senate more than twice, and no person who has held the office of Senator, or acted as Senator, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected Senator shall be elected to the office of Senator more than once. 

This Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of Senator when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of Senator, or acting as Senator, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of Senator or acting as Senator during the remainder of such term.

Section 2.  No person shall be elected to office of the House of Representatives member more than six times, and no person who has held the office of House Representative member, or acted as House of Representative member, for more than six months of a term to which some other person was elected Representative shall be elected to the office of House of Representative member more than once.

This Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of House of Representatives member when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of House of Representatives member, or acting as a House of Representatives member, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of Representative member or acting as Representative member during the remainder of such term.

Section 3. 

No Federal District Judge and no Supreme Court Justice shall serve more than twelve years.

Section 4.

No Senator, and no House of Representative member, and no Federal District Judge, and no Supreme Court Justice shall benefit from any laws passed without such laws being applicable equally to all citizens. 

Section 5. 

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the dates of its submission to the States by the Congress.

Written this 15th Day of
December, 2016
In Bath, Ohio, USA

Respectfully submitted,

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne,

Citizen

____________________

Commentary of December 7, 2016 The United States of America Department of Justice, An Agency that lives in infamy, by Thomas Joseph Coyne ©

December 7, 1941: “a day that will live in infamy” cited by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt as one to be corrected, “. . . so help us God,” resulted in entry into solution of Germany’s World War II, only 20 years after our similarly costly involvement ended Germany’s World War I.  Japan’s military and unspeakable abuses (“The Rape of Nanking”) were corrected at about the same time.   

Since 1941 our Department of Justice (DOJ) has been converted into nothing more than a politicallly manipuladted Department of Legal Affairs, with “legal” being defined only after politicians in charge decide which criminals to prosecute and which ones to “pardon.”  Criminals with the most money to “donate” to continued existence in office of elected or appointed career lifelong politicians appear innocent enough to pardon.  Criminals often are not prosecuted initially even when admitting guilt.    

Payment for pardon of criminals is a criminal act, briberyViolations of the Hatch Act (1939) are criminal offenses. Extortion is payment to public officials to do the job they are required to do anyway. These are criminal acts but go unpunished. The FBI knows but is told to do nothing. It does nothing! Payment of money (a bribe) by a politicial party to government employees to serve as collection agent for the tax-free political party is bribery and extortion; however, as with all other criminal acts NO private citizen in the USA may pursue a criminal complaint against any politician or other person.   Only government persons (FBI, for example) may pursue criminal offenses against anyone. The FBI is politically controlled, and when FBI refuses to pursue criminals everyday citizens suffer. Democracy suffers. Government of the people suffers. In the long run democracy dies! By political design, no remedy for everyday citizens exists in the USA when FBI agents are required by criminal politicians to behave as corruptly as lifelong insider politicians!

Politicians pick and choose their criminals carefully thereby improving their chances for lifelong exploitation of "service" in office, or until they decide to “retire” after which the "insider right” to crime may be passed onto one's children who may “serve” in like manner. Corruption continues unabated!  Corrupt politically appointed Federal District Judges and U.S. Supreme Court "Justices" are exempt from criminal prosecution in like manner, even when they knowingly violate Constitutional rights of citizens.  No remedy for citizens exists at law.  No end to damages of democracy by these actions is in sight, and none of it has repercussions to the political criminals involved.

Many well-known politically appointred and elected persons are guilty of criminal activity (allowing drugs into the country, providing guns to Mexican gangs/persons, Hatch Act violations, Ballot manipulations), with no criminal charges filed against them by Department of Legal Affairs.  A political insider has given cash, ammunition, and military equipment to our sworn enemies.  An “insider” profited by or gifted “Stinger” missiles in a combat zone to known, sworn enemies.  These missiles may kill American military persons in the field with no criminal charges forthcoming, and the private citizen is told by his Ruling Class that s/he shall do nothing!  Why?    

We need and might one day have again a Department of Justice “so help us God” if we:  (A) “drain the swamp” and (B) pass an Amendment to our Constitution limiting each political person to 12 years maximum in elected or  appointed office.

____________________

Thanksgiving Day November 24, 2016 “Drain the Swamp” - Thomas Joseph Coyne ©

The United States of America is the only nation on planet earth celebrating Thanksgiving Day, thanking God, but we must remind ourselves:  our freedom is not free.  Corrupt, politically untrustworthy persons work daily from their comfortable ‘swamp’ in a continuing effort to destroy everything American citizens have fought, bled and died to achieve.  We must drain the swamp

The swamp is a region saturated with dirty water and dirty animals.  Some are human, each moving in as deceitful and deceptive a manner as possible.  The non-human swamp population includes killer bees, difficult to detect bugs, Alligators, blackbirds, but snakes exist in this location including “copperhead” snakes, a poisonous rattlesnake that has no rattles.  The copperhead appears harmless with its golden skin color and demeanor, but sneaks-up with no warning on unsuspecting prey, posing and acting harmless, appearing non-threatening.  One learns of a copperhead’s intent only after he strikes, when it is too late.  Politicians have become copperheads by definition.  President Lincoln warned us of human copperheads.

Human copperheads live, work and play in the USA to assure victory for any and all enemies of this once-great nation.  Copperheads specialize in dissent from within.  The Copperhead pits Blacks against white persons, poor against rich, uneducated against educated, young against old, and so on.  The human political copperhead lies, cheats, steals, commits murder if and when thought necessary to further his cause which is to finance abortions, establish innumerable Agencies populated with incompetent people, open all national borders, force ‘common core’ educational nonsense to dumb-down young persons, ignore justice in a corrupt legal system, and the list goes on. 

Human Copperheads exist in the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, many if not most Federal District Courts, and they perform musicals on Broadway and make movies in Hollywood.  The human copperhead strikes while one is not looking, when one is relaxed and has been convinced his Copperhead is ‘serving’ the public interest in an elected or appointed government office(s).   

Only a political copperhead sells a U.S. Stinger shoulder-fired missile in Afghanistan to an armed enemy to allow the enemy to shoot-down a U. S. Chinook helicopter (2015), or sends money, military arms and equipment in the hundreds of millions of dollars to the enemy so he can purchase additional arms and equipment (2016), with the copperhead person receiving a financial kick-back for his effort, and the list of depraved activities goes on.  Copperheads go unpunished or when punished receive presidential pardons!

NO U.S. Senator, NO U.S. House of Rep. member, NO Federal District or U. S. Supreme Court Judge should “serve” more than 12 "copperhead" years, subsequent to which no salary, health care, pension or other benefit should accrue to any of them; moreover, ALL laws passed pertaining to everyday U. S. citizens must be applicable equally to every appointed and/or elected government official. We shall drain the swamp!

____________________   

Election Day Commentary, November 8, 2016, Thomas Joseph Coyne ©

Thank you God!  Thank you God!  Thank you God!

Let the clean-up begin! 

  1. Establishment of Term limits for all elected government persons is critical if this Presidential election outcome is to provide long-term relief from routine abuse of power and position by governmental persons. Only an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution can resolve this problem. Once term limits are established hope exists for creation through the U.S. Congress of a legitimate Department of Justice, see below. (American Black persons will benefit almost immediately from this long overdue and necessary Amendment)! Except for POTUS who has an 8 year maximum tenure, we must mandate a 12 year maximum tenure in elected public office, two terms for U.S. Senators maximum; six terms for U.S. House members maximum, and get out!  Get a real job. No salary or pension(s) or health care after "serving" the public for these 12 years, and ALL laws pertaining to everyday Americans shall pertain equally to elected public officials!
  1. Only when the intentionally ruinous “Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act” (GLBA) is rescinded is it possible for national and international improvement in employment, output and income to occur. Improvement(s) is impossible without cancellation of GLBA!  We must reestablish our former Glass-Steagall Act of 1934, a successful piece of legislation for 72 years but nullified wrongly in November, 1999, by this almost-criminal major change in bank structure by Bill Clinton. Competition in finance is good; GLBA killed competition and created world-wide bank monopoly of finance, which is horrendous! Think Finance: Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., Financial Economist, is able and willing to solve this problem(s) by serving as Chairman, Federal Reserve System;
  1. Innumerable unnecessary government Agencies need immediate abolishment;
  1. The Social Security Act must be amended, solving nicely and easily future threats to senior citizens of entitled retirement money;
  1. Environment Protection Agency (EPA) financial mandates must be rescinded.  EPA has no constitutional right to tax!
  1. Governmental financing of abortions must be stopped; A Department of Justice must be created as we have nothing but a Department of Legal Affairs currently, dependent upon what one's definition of "is", is. Uncommonly high American Black imprisonment has resulted; and, the Internal Revenue Code must be amended to a 7% tax on ALL businesses and persons: We all play, we all pay! No more tax-exempt organizations.
  1. Illegal immigration, ISIS brutality, and, replacement of ObamaCare for all U.S. citizens must be pursued with vigor – and with no delays!  Make ALL U.S. citizens safe again.

God Blessed America, again!  Through Him ‘We the People’ stand ready, willing and able to speak again, and as loudly as necessary, by whatever means necessary!  Thank you God!

____________________

Benghazi Questions as of October 22, 2016 by Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA; Ph.D., Candidate for POTUS 2016. (COYNE's access to the ballot was blocked on 9/9/2015 in the totally rigged South Carolina Republican Party Primary election(s). The court case, Coyne v. South Carolina Secretary of State et al, 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH, filed 9/10/2015, remains pending in U. S. District Court of Columbia, S.C). ©

     Assuming U.S. Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi on an important mission, with little or no advance notice and/or preparation, the following questions, among a host of other inquiries, remain unanswered.  We the people are entitled to answers; for example,

  1. Why?  What was the rush?  Who authorized and/or insisted upon his trip?
  2. Did President Obama or his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, send Ambassador Stevens? What was his mission?
  3. Was Ambassador Stevens’ mission to reclaim/recover U. S. made “Stinger” missiles, major military assets left when U. S. Forces were removed by Obama from one location or the other, and Stinger missiles were abandoned, included among other weapons, cash, ammunition, trucks, tanks, simply left by Obama for Muslim extremists to “find” subsequent to U. S. Military personnel departure, or were these Stinger missiles sold to Muslim extremist enemies through a private arms dealer? Was money thus obtained shared by domestic and/or foreign politicians?
  4. Abandoned or sold U.S. Stinger missiles are shoulder-fired and at least one appeared in Afghanistan on July 25, 2012 to down a U. S. Chinook helicopter?  The Stinger missile used was armed incorrectly by our enemies, but hit the target and did not explode?  Remnants of our expensive but destroyed helicopter exist and have revealed serial and other numbers identifying the precise Stinger missile?
  5. If Obama compromised the integrity of the Office of President of the United States while Hillary provided Stingers to our armed enemy are they individually and collectively guilty of treason?
  6. Is this criminal act by Obama and Hillary nothing more than another poor judgment call, another exercise of common and routine poor judgment that has cost the USA a decline of reputation throughout the world as well as the death of our Ambassador and the heroes who attempted to go to his assistance, plus the reputation of an innocent General Petraeus and of an innocent Youtube presenter?
  7. Was Hillary guilty of perjury when she claimed under oath she might not have remembered events of Benghazi correctly, as Benghazi had occurred such a long time ago and “what difference does it make” at this late date?    
  8.  Is Hillary a hero for disallowing support for Stevens and friends for she saved the lives of U.S. rescue planes and personnel because she knew our U.S. Stingers were in enemy hands and would be used against any force she (the USA) sent to help Ambassador Stevens?
  9. Did U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hide a private insecure, non-government computer system in her private residence in upstate New York? Did Hillary do it to conceal rather than reveal criminal acts and mistakes in judgment, in Benghazi and elsewhere?

We the people need, want, desire, demand answers, but from whom?  Even our Department of Justice (DOJ) has been corrupted? Our FBI is fully aware of the S. C. extortion, bribery, manipulation of primary election deadline dates in S.C., requirements to pledge allegiance to the Republican Party head, violations of poll taxes, and other violations of Amdndments 1, 14, and 24 of our Constitution, but appears to see nothing wrong with stonewalling these and other issues of major importance?  Ask not for whom the FBI works for in this instance it works not for thee? For whom does the DOJ and "our" FBI work?

___________________

Camaign:  Focus on Utah, October 18, 2016: Thomas Joseph Coyne ©.

The well-funded, continuous effort by life-long professional politicians, Democrats and Republicans, our “Ruling Class” plans to dump “The Donald.” Their combined effort is within weeks of successful completion. 

Ruling Class members, elected and appointed, understand Hillary cannot win the election on November 8, 2016 if any semblance of justice exists within our alleged Department of Justice.  Hillary is unable to cite so much as one example (1) of how macroeconomic or microeconomic policy of which she has been a significant part for the past thirty years has benefited anyone except Bill and her Foundation.  The matter of wrongful deaths over the years of numerous persons (60) closely affiliated with “The Clintons” explained only thus far by a “what does it matter” shall not suffice. 

One thinks not only of abandonment of Ambassador Stevens (Libya) and the handful of heroes who attempted to help him, but of Vince Foster.  Hillary has never explained or been held accountable for interference and lack of cooperation with FBI when Foster’s dead body was moved, declared “suicide” and dumped in a yard across from the White House.  Why?  What about 57 (?) or more alleged suicides of young persons, some State of Arkansas troopers assigned to Bill while he was governor?  Patrolman Ferguson, and later his former wife, both died we are told (wrongly) of suicide.  (Mrs. Ferguson was waiting for a cab, sitting on her luggage to go to the airport attempting to escape the Clintons). 

Donald could win  outright, but not when he fails to discuss with specificity how he will handle issues such as  the world-wide banking crisis caused intentionally by passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), November, 1999, signed into law  by Hillary’s co-president, Bill.  GLBA prohibits competition between commercial banks and other financial intermediaries.  GLBA cancelled our Glass-Steagall Act of 1934, a piece of legislation that required competition, and provided world-wide financial stability for the better part of seventy-two years (72).  Banks in Germany, Japan, China, Russia, Greece, and other places in the news currently are beginning to notice.  What about us?  When are we going to be told of the GLBA failure?

Ruling Class members are placing heavy bets on “their” write-in candidate in the State of Utah winning the national election in Utah to the office of President of the United States (POTUS), thereby gaining for himself 100% of Utah’s Electoral College vote.  Without this Utah vote neither Hillary nor Donald is capable of accumulating the required 270 Electoral College votes necessary to win.  Absent a win by either candidate, the final vote for POTUS rests with the U. S. House of Representatives who will vote for the candidate of their choice.  The everyday American vote is worthless, dammed, ignored?  Paul Ryan can become POTUS, or Romney could take it or a totally controlled by Ruling Class insider such as Kasich?  Under this scenario:  Donald Trump cannot be elected POTUS. 

Tom Coyne

www.coyne-assoc.com

____________________

FACT:  THE ONLY PERSON QUALIFIED TO REPLACE DONALD TRUMP ON THE BALLOT FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (POTUS), AND TO INSURE DEFEAT OF HILLARY CLINTON IS
THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
September 21, 2016
_________________________________

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Plaintiff

                                                                           C/A No. 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH
Versus
                               RESPONSE TO ORDER
                              (Received 9/17/2016)
South Carolina Secretary of State (SCSOS)

                         And

South Carolina Republican Party (SCGOP)

Defendants           

__________________________________

Plaintiff Coyne filed this action pro se on September 15, 2015 seeking protection of rights  specified by the Constitution of the United States of America, with such justice being sought from the Federal District Court, Columbia, South Carolina. 

“The Court” in the person of United States District Judge Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., and based upon a “Report” written July 26, 2016 by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges, denied “Coyne’s motion for preliminary injunction, grants Defendent SCSOS’s motion to dismiss it as a party, denied Defendent SCGOP’s motion to dismiss pursant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6), and denied Coyne’s motion for summary judgment.”  The order issued erroneously was vacated by Anderson on September 13, 2016.  Objections to the Hodges Report, if any, were due “on August 12, 2016; however, no objections were filed,” according to The Court.  No person can object to an unknown Report.  Recognizing that fact, The Court, while continuing to provide electronic communications concerning the case to SCSOS, advised all concerned it would continue to deprive Plaintiff Coyne of “equal protection” saying Plaintiff Coyne “. . . will not be electronically mailed.” 

By U.S. Postal System, Coyne was given until September 30, 2016 to file with the Court any objection(s) he might have; thus, this “Response to Order Ruling on Report Recommendation filed on 8/30/16.” The vacated Court Order and Hodges Report (9/13/16) by Anderson allows both Defendants additional time delay(s) before any meaningful action may be taken.  The Court might decide to do the job it is bought and paid to do but only subsequent to completion of national elections for POTUS on November 8, 2016, by design.

The new Anderson Order, Southern District of South Carolina, Columbia, S.C. is fraudulent on many counts, most notably three, while it could have and should have ordered Summary Judgment in Coyne’s favor.  Anderson should rest his case on (A) SCGOP agreement in documents in Court records concerning Plaintiff Coyne’s complaints regarding the First, 14th and 24th amendment right violations, and (B) agreeing with Coyne complaints concerning extortion and (C) bribery and (D) manipulation of deadline dates for Primary Election filing, and numerous other complaints raised by Coyne.  An Anderson Court needs to acknowledge:   

  1. Plaintiff Coyne was denied his copy of the Hodges Report until 1:30 PM on Saturday, September 17, 2016, Labor Day weekend, and ten days (10) subsequent to the currently unanswered Coyne “Motion for Trial by Jury,” September 7, 2016.  Coyne did not know a “Hodge’s Report” existed.  Coyne was denied, again, “equal treatment under the law” (Amendment 14).  Refusal to give Plaintiff Coyne a copy of the “Hodges Report” was not accidental!  Coyne, since September 15, 2015, while present personally in the Office of Clerk, Columbia, S. C., has demanded but has been denied equal notifications; instead, Plaintiff Coyne is told routinely he “will not be electronically mailed to (sic);”  
  2. SCSOS failed to comply with Rule of Procedure 12.  SCSOS failed to respond to Plaintiff complaints within the 60 days required by Rule 12; consequently, SCSOS had and has NO legal standing in this case.  SCSOS had and has NO legal authority to file any motion or introduce any new evidence and/or procedure(s) because of its decision to violate Rule 12.  It is knowingly fraudulent for this Court to allow one party, Defendant SCSOS, to avoid following mandated “Rules” while using its in-house, insider only rules to damage seriously Plaintiff Coyne; and,
  1. Time!  Timeliness! Notice the underlined dates cited in this Response and in all court documents associated with this case.  As this Court-required and mandated response is being prepared national elections for POTUS are only a few days away.  POTUS is an office Plaintiff Coyne was entitled to pursue but has been denied his right to do so by Defendants intentionally imposing delays and other misapplications of justice (Bad Faith) and by self-serving Court appointees, and all of it in an “effort to do whatever it takes” to protect SCGOP and SCSOS (Source: South Carolina State Election Board, September 9, 2015).  This Court has abused the power and position entrusted to it with intentional delays, and more, and has done so in an unconstitutional manner, damaging Plaintiff Coyne financially and professionally while denying the public at large an opportunity to hear financial solutions to major problems facing this nation.   

THE SOLE PURPOSE, THE FIRST AND ONLY PURPOSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS TO PROTECT CITIZENS OF EACH STATE IN THE UNITED STATES FROM ABUSIVE, ABRASIVE OUT-OF-CONTROL ELECTED AND APPOINTED GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.  PLAINTIFF COYNE LOOKED TO THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, THE COURT SYSTEM, FOR REASONABLE ENFORCEMENT OF CITIZEN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.  THE COURT ITSELF HAS PROVEN TO BE OUT OF CONTROL, LEAVING PLAINTIFF WITH NO LEGAL PROTECTION.

Regarding the 2016 primary election in South Carolina the Anderson Order could have addressed innumerable violations of Hatch Act of 1939.  When one knows of criminal violations s/he is responsible to do something about it.  Who better is there to do something about it than a U.S. District Court Judge, one most likely possessing life-long tenure unless his concern is with personal safety?  SCGOP documents with The Court say the Republican political party is ruined when Coyne wins the case. 

Plaintiff Coyne has been financially and professionally damaged badly by appointed South Carolina federal district judges, magistrate and otherwise, each of whom work for, report to and are guided by instructions from corrupt politicians who pay their wages, salaries and supplements.  For “The Court” to find in favor of Plaintiff these judgeship appointees must acknowledge existence of hundreds of thousands of dollars in extortion money ($40,000.00 per candidate) demanded by the SCSEB and obtained by the SCGOP following instructions from the SCSOS’s commissioned members to the SCSEB during the 2016 Primary election of POTUS in South Carolina.  The Court has time if it immediately corrects former errors. 

AN OBJECTION (ONE OF MANY)

The SCSOS is responsible for the existence of each member of the SCSEB.  The SCSOS appoints, commissions each member of the South Carolina State Election Board (SCSEB).  No evidence was forthcoming upon demand by Plaintiff Coyne concerning what happens to the $20,000.00 of the mandated $40,000.00, the financial bribes? 

When state government employees demanded $20,000 as a poll tax/fee/other tax and had a court agree to the $20,000 it is “other tax” and legalized theft.  $40,000 as a poll tax existed in the 2016 Republican Primary in S.C.  The “other” $20,000 remains a mystery?  Well educated and politically correct and politically connected persons pretend not to notice the difference.  As a financial economist I can assure you of this fact:  the number 20 is not identical to the number 40; however; socialist economists everywhere continue to think 2 + 2 = 5.  It does not!  SCSOS and SCGOP conspire to control everything and they are in it together.  Please do not insult yourself by pretending otherwise.  (p.s. The Democrat Party is doing the same thing).

Is $20,000.00 collected by SCGOP from its $40,000.00 other tax, and given to SCSEB following SCGOP’s successful demands of $40,000.00 retained by SCSEB members, persons commissioned by SCSOS, or does all or some of that money find its way back to one or more member of the SCSOS who commissioned the SCSEB official? 

An illegal “motion to dismiss” was filed by SCSOS , and the motion was accepted and awarded by appointed ‘judges’ who saw fit to “grant SCSOS’s motion to dismiss” itself from Plaintiff

complaints, thereby hiding forever, perhaps, the important answer to this important question:  Who in South Carolina government gets the kicked-back $20,000.00?  Does Senator Lindsey Graham get all or some of the money; if so is he double-dipping, getting some of the $20,000 retained also by the GOP and getting some of the money, $20,000.00, as an elected official representing the State of South Carolina?  If expected to pay these bribes, I had and have every right to know what I am purchasing, from whom and why! 

Plaintiff Coyne does not pay extortion money, nor does he allow any or all money paid by him knowingly to go as bribes to government elected or appointed persons; thus, Plaintiff Coyne refused to pay and because of his refusal Plaintiff Coyne was denied placement of his name on the primary ballot.  Because Coyne refused to pay extortion money and bribes to the Office of SCSEB, Coyne was told flat-out by a person who may or may not share with a person or persons at the SCSOS:  "No payment, no Ballot"!  Placement of the Coyne name on the ballot for POTUS in the primary election in South Carolina, 2016 was denied for this financial reason(s), and for matters of Coyne’s good character, honor, integrity and principle.    Plaintiff Coyne in particular and citizens of the USA in general suffer irreparable harm because of this Anderson order.  The Court illegally and immorally defended Defendant SCSOS; however, if the Anderson order was issued in error, Judge Anderson is in position to correct the error at once - with NO additional time lags.

                          IRREPARABLE HARM

Plaintiff attempts to function in an honorable manner, playing by the rules.  He considers it fraudulent and refuses to campaign, and for any candidate to campaign for any office, if s/he cannot get his/her name on the ballot.  Plaintiff cannot get his name on the ballot when an appointed Magistrate Judge and an appointed U.S. Federal District judge argue in favor of Defendant by claiming damage to Plaintiff caused by the inappropriate SCSOS’s illegal initial motion(s) was and “is nominal.”  Factually, irreparable harm was done to Plaintiff, intentionally, when Rule 12 was violated by Defendant SCSOS and that violation was upheld by The Court.  The SCSOS motion was made in “bad faith” and succeeded by design in delaying further a court order.  The election for POTUS is only days away and The Court delayed issuance of an Order until now, more than one year after this action was filedThe delay cannot be considered unintentional unless one assumes the author of the “order” is too incompetent to function as a federal judge?
 
The appointed Magistrate judge and U.S. District Judge’s “order” is without merit.  The Order ignores massive harm done also to uncounted millions of citizens of this nation, and abroad.  The Court delay in issuance of an order, when combined  with other work to disallow the name of Plaintiff Coyne onto the ballot in the primary election,  kept Plaintiff Coyne from participating in debates for POTUS in “the first primary” election in the south thereby concealing information of some substance from the voting public.  Information providing the financial solution to Social Security, for example, was denied thereby to the population at large, especially senior citizens (Source:  Coyne/World_Finance.htm, written by invitation for The World Finance & Banking Symposium, Central University of Finance and Economics, (for presentation in Beijing, December 2013), P.R. China, p. 7 of 43 pages, December 2013)) ©.   The debates would have made available to citizen voters facts and solutions concerning: 

  1. the many, many hundreds of millions of American dollars missing currently but recoverable at the World Bank by a competent POTUS;
  2. the International Monetary Fund (IMF) finance and investment failures world-wide and with American money;
  3. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), the causal factor associated with bank failures throughout the world; repeat, THE cause, and by Federal District Court prevention of Coyne’s entry into the primary election campaign in S.C. in 2016, GLBA continues to destroy economies throughout the world.  Misguided Court behavior disallowed revelation of solutions to collapse in world-wide economic systems, to include the pain and suffering of each household, each family, each job and/or former job in this nation and beyond because of it. 

Senator Lindsey Graham, (R. SC) was not the author of GLBA, but if Senator Graham was to be on the stage with Plaintiff Coyne at the same time during the primary election in 2016, this intentional destruction of the domestic American economy, and beyond, could have been revealed to a population deserving to know the truth.  Solution is available with no further delay.  Solution need not await the national election.  Solution is at hand and easy, but it must be revealed in detail.  Absent Plaintiff Coyne discussion of how and why GLBA was created and signed into law on November 21, 1999 by President Bill Clinton, the public is left without knowledge of how banking in Japan, China, Germany, England and elsewhere is failing or has failed.  Investment banks in the USA, most notably Lehman Brothers, Bear-Stearns and others, failed because of GLBA.  Taxpayers incurred the financial cost, the real cost was in terms of unemployment, underemployment and business failures by the many, many score.  Investment banks differ markedly from commercial banks.  GLBA intentionally blurred the difference in structure and competitive constraints.  And Note:  Senator Lindsey Graham removed himself from the primary in S.C. only days after the Coyne action was filed in S.C. on 9/15/2015;

  1. ISIS.  This country has handled suicide bombers before and the solution has to do with financing.  Most certainly, we do not send ISIS arms, equipment and ammunition plus hundreds of millions of dollars in cash with which to harm us, and harm the world.  Banks everywhere could be encouraged by USA to discontinue dealing with ISIS.  Coyne knows precisely how to do this.  The Court denied revelation of “how” to do it to the taxpaying public.

 

  1. Public Interest.  The primary election in S.C. in 2016 was a totally rigged event due in large part to the Federal District Court, Columbia, S.C., accepting an important case, Plaintiff Coyne, and sitting on it.  The public interest was ignored totally as The Court did its best to support the SCGOP with what appears to Plaintiff as intentional delay after intentional delay.  The delay strategy appears to continue to this date (9/20/16).  The GOP has no Constitutional right to regulate “candidates (entry) on the Ballot,” as claimed by The Court;
  1. Filing Fee.  The filing fee is an “other tax” used to run the polls on Election Day according to SCGOP documents before The Court.  This admission by SCGOP, combined with SCSOS abandonment of Civil Rule of Procedure 12 as discussed elsewhere, is reasonable, adequate, total grounds for Judge Anderson to issue Summary Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Coyne;

 

  1. Loyalty Pledge.  Plaintiff Coyne pledges allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and . . . .  No Court, No tax-free organization has any right to assume and/or mandate anything different; ,
  1. Federal Reserve System (The Fed).  During my financial talks with the Boards of Directors of U.S.S.R. commercial banks the emphasis was our Federal Reserve System.  I was flown to Russia, and Belorussia, and Latvia, and met with Boards of Directors of every U.S.S.R. bank (2 banks only, each with hundreds of thousands of branches), intending to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of expressing the value of the Russian Ruble in American dollars; however, most of my time with Board members in Moscow and Leningrad concerned The Fed.  Time was spent as well with Russian economics and finance faculty members, mostly in Leningrad. 

 

  1. Our Fed is in very serious trouble currently.  I am expert in what ails it, or so thought the Russians.  Russia (Soviet Union) diverted a plane carrying Russian troops home from Cuba.  Aeroflot had it land in Shannon, Ireland for me and my delegation of 36 Finance persons in Shannon, Ireland.  U.S.S.R. was not permitted to land in the USA at the time.  We had been scheduled to leave the USA on Pan Am Airlines from LaGuardia but the plane left without us.  “No problem” I was assured by the head of Aeroflot USA who sought me out at the airport in New York, LaGuardia, purchased seats for me and my group of 36 persons to fly Aer Lengus first class non-stop to Shannon, make the connection next morning with the Soviet military aircraft and go on to Moscow, Riga, Latvia, and the rest is history.  I met Boris Yeltzin on that trip. Quietly, Mr. Yeltzin came to see me outside the Bolshoi Theatre in Moscow after a truly marvelous ballet presentation.  I did not seek him out.
  1. Commander-in-Chief.  I am uniquely qualified to serve as POTUS.  No other person discussed in news media and elsewhere is capable of handling the job, especially now that we are into World War III.  The Anderson order is critically important at this time.  Anderson is playing with an incredibly serious fire, perhaps, if he is not a combat veteran.  Disaster awaits ALL of us if the wrong person controls our military, especially after the Obama years of neglect; most certainly, we must get a well qualified person into the commander-in-chief position:  Plaintiff Coyne.

 

  1. The Obama Birth Certificate. The following is a copy of the authentic birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama II, a/k/a Barry Soetoro for approximately 26 of his 52 years on earth. This copy has appeared on this web page in years past, first having been supplied to Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., on June 10, 2010.  This birth certificate arrived unannounced and was sent by a person I have never met.  He assures me it was obtained by him from the USA’s Secret Service.  This certificate appeared at one time also on the “Hour of Power” web page, a church service of substance I am assured.  The point:  When combined with other totally believable sources, I consider this certificate authentic.  To test authenticity is easy:  get a foot print of Barack Hussein Obama II, known for approximately 26 years of his life as Barry Soetoro.

 

 

http://www.coyne-assoc.com/index_clip_image002.jpg
http://www.coyne-assoc.com/index_clip_image002_0000.jpg
SOURCE:  www.coyne-assoc.com

The Ann Dunham signed registration form for Barack Hussein Obama II elementary school entry as a Muslim student at the St. Francis of Assisi Roman Catholic Elementary School, Jakarta, Indonesia, elementary school pictures and other confirmations plus and considerable detail about his mother, Ann Dunham, his Grandmother, Madelyn exist and need to be understood.  President Obama’s is part and parcel of the largest fraud perpetrated ever on the American people, and upon people from all corners of the earth.  Ann Dunham’s principal employment was with the USA’s CIA at the time, the primary source of this birth certificate.  The Court may take solace in knowledge that none of this information was permitted to be presented by Plaintiff Coyne during the 2016 Republican Primary election debates.  Otherwise, the nation and world would have a different candidate, Plaintiff Coyne, leading the polls.  The Anderson Order has contributed to denial of badly needed information to a national audience. It was wrong of the Court to do so.  Judge Anderson should please move now to correct that wrong.   

          Bottom line for The Court to understand:  the public interest was damaged badly by the Federal District Court, Columbia, S.C. successful effort to deny Coyne access to the Ballot in the Republican Primary Election of 2016.  That fact is bad news for our country, of course but good news exists also.  Judge Anderson has time to correct The Court’s former errors.

Personal greed and corruption by elected and appointed politicians continues to run amuck in the USA.  Only politically correct, life-long professional politicians are permitted onto the ballot in total violation of the Constitution, especially in this case with violations of Amendments 1, 14, and 24; yet, “The Court” used a Magistrate Judge Report which claimed, wrongly, that harm done to Plaintiff was “nominal.”  Shear madness!  Sheer nonsense!
          
Balance of Equities
 
Nothing in the Constitution allows The Court to determine who is qualified to file a grievance with an out-of-control government or political party, groups in dire need of significant change.  The Court, Magistrate Judge, argues in favor of the SCGOP saying SCGOP has a legitimate interest in controlling ballot access inasmuch as Plaintiff has “failed to demonstrate his principled reasons for declining to sign the party pledge and pay the filing fee (poll tax/other tax), $40,000.00, $20,000.00 of which is to bribe outweigh the interests of the state and the SCGOP in regulating candidates for the Ballot”.  No government or governmental unit has authority to require reasons from any citizen wishing to grieve government abuse as in this case.  This last quote by the magistrate judge is utter nonsense!  Every citizen, including Plaintiff Coyne, has rights that outweigh the limited rights granted by citizens to the state. 

The “interests of the state” in this notion by the appointed Magistrate Judge include continued collection by it of illegal bribes by, to and for government employees in violation of The Hatch Act of 1939; The interests of the SCGOP in this notion of the same judge include using state government persons to refuse to allow anyone onto the ballot that does not pay the $40,000.00 initially to the SCGOP; the interests of the SCGOP include continued payment to government persons of bribes allowing access restriction(s). 

This Court, no Court is in business to argue for continuation of price and output behavior beneficial to a private not-for-profit corporation, SCGOP, and to extreme detriment of Plaintiff and the public-at-large.  Any Court thinking differently is out of order and functioning in violation of its oath of office when appointed! Plaintiff has a legitimate interest in changing the sense of direction of an out of control political group of financiers who know not what they do!  

Plaintiff is qualified beyond belief.  Court protection of political status quo as conducted in this case is unacceptable.      

Respectfully submitted,

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for the Office of
President of the United States
www.coyne-assoc.com
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333
(330) 836-0563 ground wire
(330) 957-7962 cell

_____________________

The following persons and/or organizations have received this date by U.S. Postal System a copy of this Response; it is certified hereby.

  1. Mark Hammond, SOS, South Carolina

1205 Pendleton St.; # 525
 Columbia, South Carolina 29201
2.   Bowers Law Office
P. O. Box 50549
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
3.   U. S. Supreme Court Justices, Roberts; Kennedy; Thomas; Ginsburg; Breyer; Alito;   Sotomayer; and, Kagan.  Also, Harris (Clerk) and Silver
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Office of Clerk
Washington, D. C. 20543-0001
4.   FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation)
      151 W. Park Boulevard
      Columbia, South Carolina 29201
5.   Terry L. Wooten, Chief
      U. S. District Judge
      901 Richland Street
      Columbia, South Carolina 29201
6.   South Carolina Republican Party
      Office of Nat Moore
      1913 Marion Street
      Columbia, South Carolina 29201

7.    U. S. Attorney for South Carolina
      1441 Main Street; # 500
      Columbia, South Carolina 29201
8.    Atty. General of U.S.
      Department of Justice; Rm. 5111
      10th Street and Constitution Ave., NW
      Washington, D. C. 20530
9.    Nikki Haley, Governor
      1205 Pendleton Street
      Columbia, South Carolina 29201
10.  S. C. Atty. General Wilson
      P. O. Box 11549
      Columbia, South Carolina 29201
9.    Other (s)
_________________________________
  

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
September 7, 2016
______________________________

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Plaintiff

Versus

South Carolina Secretary of State, and
South Carolina Republican Party,
Defendants

____________________________________

C/A No 3:15-cv-03669-JFA-SVH

MOTION FOR TRIAL BY JURY

____________________________________

            Thomas Joseph Coyne (“Coyne”), filed this action written on September 10, 2015 and filed in person by him in Columbia, South Carolina as attorney-for-self (pro se) on September 15, 2015 seeking declaration that the registration fee/poll tax and loyalty pledge requirement made by the State of South Carolina (SOS) on behalf of the Republican Party of South Carolina violate his First, Fourteenth, and Twenty-Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Plaintiff's "expedited" Motion request of 2015 was answered, incorrectly, by Federal District Court in Columbia, South Carolina one year (1) later!

Action by the Court being demanded by Plaintiff includes but is not limited to order by the court that:    

(1) No signed, notarized written pledge of allegiance may be demanded by SOS to support decisions made by the Republican Party of South Carolina (RPSC) leadership persons, as precondition to being allowed to have his/her name on the ballot for President of the United States (POTUS).  No government in the United States has authority to demand of any citizen as pre-condition of participating in an election that the citizen shall pledge allegiance to a political party or leader;

(2) No State government or governmental Agency may demand loyalty of any citizen to a specific not-for-profit or for profit private corporation;

(3) No State government (SOS) or governmental Agency may function as a collection Agency for RPSC or any political party or person in violation of the U.S. Hatch Act of 1939 as done in this case;

(4) No State government (SOS) or governmental Agency may demand financial kick-backs of $20,000,00 per POTUS candidate (1/2 of a $40,000.00 poll tax/registration fee) as happened in Plaintiff’s case on September 9, 2015 while attempting to get his name on the ballot for POTUS Primary Election in South Carolina, 2016);

(5) No State government (SOS) or governmental Agency may share financially, take any money collected, extorted or otherwise, from any Candidate for POTUS; 

(6) No registration fee/poll tax, “or other tax" may be collected from anyone in any election for POTUS at any time;

(7) No government may mandate or impose a poll tax “or other tax” on any citizen as pre-condition of having his/her name on the ballot for POTUs, as done in this case;

(8) No government or governmental Agency shall deny equal protection, equal apportionment under the law as happened to Plaintiff in this case;

(9) No defendant, SOS in this case, one who fails to respond to Plaintiff demands in Federal District Court, failed to make an appearance, failed completely, but then after the 60 day time frame as established by the Court Rule 12 in which to answer Plaintiff expires, shall be allowed to enter the case, submit a motion and, worse yet, have his/her Motion to Dismiss himself/itself honored.  SOS was permitted after failing to respond to Plaintiff complaint in the 60 days mandated by Court rule to enter the case and file a Motion to Dismiss itself from the complaint and SOS had the Motion honored, awarded, ordered by The Court!  This event happened in this case with SOS and serves as a major blemish on Court claim(s) of an appointed Magistrate Judge and/or an appointed United States District Judge assigned to this action, persons in power who may alleged to have prepared it subsequent to study of a thorough “Report and Recommendation and opined the applicable laws, the record in this case, as well as the Report.  .  . and (summarizing) the facts and (applied) the correct principles of law,” and (did) so only after carefully reviewing, and blah, blah, blah. Shameful!  Unethical!  Unlawful!  Unacceptable!

          Worse yet, perhaps, is the Court wrongly claims the “The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report, which was entered on the docket on July 26, 2016.  The Magistrate Judge gave the parties until August 12, 2016, to file objections,” Plaintiff is told. (UNTRUE)!!  The so-called “Report” was not seen or sent to Plaintiff; in fact, Plaintiff did not know of its existence until reading of it on page 2 of The Court order favoring SOS. 

           What is true?  Plaintiff played by all the rules, received an answer to his complaint in timely manner from RPSC in which RPSC agreed with Coyne complaints.  In responding RPSC, in documents filed with the Court, said if/when Coyne wins this law suit the Republican Party is ruined.  If a politically correct Federal District Court threw-in with professional, life-long insider politicians this country is ruined.  I and others fought to preserve this once-great nation and the USA is being destroyed from within, given away!  The Federal Court in Columbia, S.C. appears to be helping, assisting in our demise.  

In the South Carolina Primary of 2016: (1) Extortion (a crime) existed in the hundreds of thousands of dollars; (2) Bribery (a crime) of, by and for government officials in and out of government existed in the hundreds of thousands of dollars; (3) Hatch Act violations (a crime) by government employees and government insiders seeking higher office existed; (4) illegal use of travel card existed ( a crime) as well as criminal use of debit cards, credit cards, cell phones, government-owned and/or leased automobiles, government employees to assist with reservations and other clerical activities while on government payroll, government computers, used both at home by government employees and on the road in airports; additionally, (5) registration dates for POTUS primary election were manipulated to keep certain undesirable candidates from the ballot. (6) RICO (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization) activity was well-known but left politically untouched by both political parties and by the Federal Court in Columbia, S. C.,. Result: The Bottom Line, the Primary Election for POTUS in 2016 in South Carolina was a totally rigged affair.

          SOS and RPSC in all likelihood received copies of the alleged “Report” via electronic transmission, via insider only transmission, but Plaintiff is not an insider.  The Court, in continued total violation of Plaintiff Constitutional rights, cited for all to see in Amendment 14, especially the part dealing with “equal protection” of the laws,” should have been treated better.    Plaintiff is and has been told by the Court during his effort to get onto the ballot for POTUS:  “Notice will not be electronically mailed to” Plaintiff Coyne, and no record exists that anyone, anywhere sent him a copy by U.S. Postal System. 

NOTE:  ALL FACTS CITED BY PLAINTIFF ARE PROVABLE IN COURT AND EXIST CURRENTLY IN DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE COURT!

          If by having “the Clerk . . . return this action back (sic) to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings” any hope, repeat, any hope exists for Court changes in position, ones favorable to Plaintiff, changes resulting in Plaintiff being on the ballot in a timely manner as an Independent Candidate nationally for POTUS, including the Motion for Summary Judgment, of course, Plaintiff is willing to cooperate, to minimize damage done to The Court by The Court.  You have one self-inflicted wound after another; however, your sins are forgiven, but please let me hear from you shortly, not next year.  If I can be of assistance to you and your profession I will attempt to minimize your damage, to help; otherwise, consider this Plaintiff Motion for Trial by Jury. 

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for Office of President of the United States (POTUS)
Attorney for Self
www.coyne-assoc.com
tom@coyne-assoc.com
(330) 835-0563
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333

______________________________

The following is an email sent to the United States of America Federal Election Commission on Wednesday, August 31, 2016, 12:47 PM. It is follow-up to an almost identical email sent by Tom Coyne at 8:47 AM the same day to Federal Election Commission, sent directly to: "Ravel@fec.gov." An FEC 'boilerplate' email was received in answer, one pretending the financing of presidential elections is not the business of the Federal Election Commission; clearly, such a rediculous response required an answer. (Only spacing and a small number of typographical errors in the 8:47 email sent from my iPad to Ravel are changed to make the content unmistakenly clear):

"Dear Federal Election Commission, Dear Sir and/or Madam:

It appears you do not understand the FEC mission, your mission, as so-called Independent regulator of national elections: FEC is to govern carefully the financing of national elections, to include national elections to POTUS. Your job requires you to deal almost exclusively wtih fiance of campaigns and candidates. MY MEMO TO YOU DEALS WTIH FINANCE. Get with the program or resign?

THINK FINANCE!

My memo to you quite corrrecty deals with the financing requirements for the office of President of the United States of America (POTUS), of the Republican Party Primary Election, 2016, South Carolina, and how THAT ELECTION was TOTALLY rigged, and in the process of rigging the Primary Republican election, corrupt government employees of the State of South Carolina, and of co-conspirator Republican Party South Carolina, collected many hundreds of thousands of dollars illegally. Money was paid by Candidates for POTUS to the Republican Party who kicked back one-half of it to unnamed State of South Carolina employees, the very state government and political party I sued because of this coruption. I refused to pay extortion; I refused to allow bribery in my name. In advance of and throughout the Primary in S.C. the government of South Carolina and the Republican Party of South Carolina were successfully and heavily involived financially in (1) extortion; (2) bribery; (3) Hatch Act violations; (4) Manipulation of deadline dates for registration: (5) RICO violations (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations); and, (6) serious violations of the 1st, 14th, and 24th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The co-conspirators collective goal: use finance to manipulate national elections for President of the United States. You are helping them succeed with your 'hands-off" attitude.

Shame, shame, shame on you for pretending not to notice, not being involved, pretending not to know of gross criminal and civil financial crimes in this critically important current presidential election!

Your continued pretention of not being required by your position to act, to be involved, document for all time your lack of pride; your lack of shame, your incompetence as a citizen, and how you contributed successfully to the fall of the United States of America while collecting high salaries and doing nothing in return. You do it because you are able to do it. You appear to love violating our trust in you by acting in such a pompous, arrogant manner.

A bloodless coup by Obama and his minnions is in the final stages of success while you sit by idly, occupying a position of power and responsibility while claiming inability to act, claiming no power to regulate and/or investigate grossly illegal financial dealings. Clearly, we have entrusted the affairs of state to the wrong people! This country is doomed! You and your colleagues in government appear quite simply to have decided to ignore your individual and collective responsibilities. Your pretenton, your idlenss is not only un-American but reveals an anti-American attitude and behavior!

May God bless you for, perhaps, maybe, unknowingly you know not what you do!!

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D. (Tom Coyne), Financial Economist, and Candidate for the Office of President of the United States of America"

____________________

Comment  of August 26 2016 by Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., © Candidate for the Office of President of the United States of America (POTUS).   Martial Law in the United States of America!

“Martial Law” is mandated government control of everything!  EVERYTHING!  Martial law is total rule of all civilian persons within the confines of a given country, the USA in this case.  Martial law is “Military Law!” 

You shall remain in your house until told by government when you may leave.  If you own a home, but no longer “need” such a large nice place, government persons will visit to inform you how many of the current illegal and homeless immigrants are being assigned to live with you in your house.  Overbuilt college/university dormitory properties such as those owned by the University of Akron in Ohio will have current illegal aliens assigned, and free to such persons, adequate personal and family space(s) in these large new but currently vacant buildings and condominium complexes.  Meanwhile national borders will be wide open officially.

When “martial law” occurs it will be too late for private citizens to express surprise.  We have entrusted our affairs of state to all the wrong persons, the wrong government officials.  Once Martial law is implemented it will be too late to say we were not looking, we were not paying attention, we were too trusting, we were too busy to discuss our totally out of control government.  Obama has acquired huge quantities of cash, ammunition, guns, missile launchers, tanks, personnel carriers, to use against us, complete with on-the-job-training of military forces in Boston, Massachusetts, and elsewhere. 

Obama, the self-declared king for eight years, the Fulbright Scholar admitted to USA as a foreign-born person from British Protectorate of Kenya, one born in Mombasa General Hospital, one known for 26 years of his life as Barry Soetoro, plans to implement martial law to protect the American public from some of the illegal immigrants he admitted to the USA.  Obama hopes to create riots and will “put down” such insurrection with martial law mandate(s).  

Obama and Company plans to assign members of the Armed Forces (1) to perform police duties within cities and states; (2) to declare within his mandate all private property is null and void, meaning all property is and shall be owned and controlled by government, (A) to include your private residence, (B) to include our national borders.  Only members of the military shall be permitted to own a weapon under martial law; therefore,  our  Second and all other Amendments to the Constitution of the United States shall be set aside, temporarily, with no definition of “temporary” appearing anywhere in sight.   

Obama and minions are blocked if Thomas Joseph Coyne is elected POTUS; however, I cannot get elected if I am blocked from getting my name on the ballot; thus, DO WHATEVER YOU CAN TO GET THE NAME OF THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE ON ALL BALLOTS NATIONALLY IN TIME TO WIN POTUS IN NOVEMBER, 2016. It is not too late!

____________________

August 20, 2016 Comment by Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.(Financial Economist), Candidate for the Office of President of the United States of America (POTUS).  ©

A candidate for the office of POTUS must understand (1) The international Monetary Fund (IMF); and, (2) The World Bank (WB).  No Republican Party and no Democrat Party candidate has revealed any understanding whatsoever of either organization! This is the most important presidential election of our lifetimes.  One must insist upon the best  educated, the most experienced non-professional insider person available to occupy the office of POTUS.

International Monetary Fund (IMF) records claim the organization was created in 1944.  Similar statements say World Bank (WB) came into existence on December 27, 1945, each a creation of the United Nations (UN), but UN did not come into existence until October, 1945, or maybe on April 20, 1946, the date LN was dissolved.  UN replaced the failed League of Nations (LN), established in 1919 subsequent to Germany’s failed military and social efforts of World War I.  LN was created to assure prevention of all future war(s).  As with our current UN, LN failed!  UN currently is an expensive, highly corrupt operation; however, as with Planned Parenthood, the rulers of UN make certain a small handful of procedures operated by them appear legitimate.  These few items are ones we may hear mostly about with the balance being secret and destined to remain that way. 

LN was dissolved on April 20, 1946 to allow creation of UN.  The IMF and WB, were created at the Breton Woods New Hampshire peace conference, July 1-22, 1944, Mt. Washington Hotel, and attributable almost totally to comments made by an exhausted British financial economist, John Maynard Keynes.  USA economists permitted Keynes to address the hundreds (790) of official attendees, but only as the last person to speak.  Speaking without notes and/or teleprompter, and while standing at his chair, Keynes' solutions to ntional and international problems in employment, output and income stunned his lawyer-dominated, professional full-time politicians in attendance. Result: IMF, and WB. Needed now is to manage them properly! (Keynes was very influential in the War I peace conference and disliked by USA economists for it). Keynes died April 21, 1946.

Keynes made recommendations in good faith, and each was and could be again of considerable value to us and the world at large if managed properly; however, as with many (most) government owned organizations, and many private not-for-tax foundations owned by life-long professional politicians, corruption from within has taken its toll.  IMF, WB and UN are seriously discredited political groups of “ruling class” persons interested in ‘milking’ the system for maximum personal financial and political control gains while expecting USA taxpayers to foot the bills.  Hundreds of millions of American dollars daily are wasted by UN, IMF and WB while USA unemployment and underemployment runs rampant. 

The IMF, WB and UN goal: have USA pay to promote global controls of all persons, including economic global growth controls, standards of living and controls of employment outside the USA, often to countries hostile to the USA, but what about Cleveland, Detroit, Philadelphia, Boston, St. Louis, . . . , ?

Do whatever it takes to get the name of Thomas Joseph Coyne on ballots nationally for POTUS!

__________________

August 6, 2016

Mike Trivisonno, Talk Show Host
WTAM 1100 CLEVELAND
6200 Oak Tree Blvd., 4th Floor
Independence, Ohio 44131-2510

Re:  Survival of the United States of America

Dear Triv:

We have not met in person, but I have listened attentively since your “Mr. Know It All” sports broadcasts some years ago; more recently, you have revealed a highly correct and exceedingly important insight into affairs of state, both local and national, for which I hereby express my sincere thanks and congratulations.  You, and people like you of whom there are few, are critical if this nation is to survive.  Please keep-up the good work.

Since September 9, 2015 I have been attempting to get my name on the ballot for President of the United States, POTUS, replacing Barack Hussein Obama, II, born to Ann Dunham, August 6, 1961 in Mombasa General Hospital, British Protectorate of Kenya, known formally for approximately 26 years of his life as Barry Soetoro, an eighth grade graduate of St. Francis of Assisi Roman Catholic Elementary School, Jakarta, Indonesia. 1.  In July of 2015 I registered officially with the Federal Election Committee in Washington as a candidate for POTUS.

On September 15, 2015 I drove to Columbia, South Carolina and filed suit in person against the S.C. Secretary of State, SOS, and its co-conspirator, Republican Party of South Carolina, RPSC, for refusing to allow placement of my name on the Primary Election ballot in S.C. for POTUS (Civil and Criminal Case # DA 300520412).  Our Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), has all the details, but refuses to act.  Chief U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Columbia, S.C. has all the details, but refuses to comment or act.  Written RPSC documents in Federal District Court acknowledgment reveal I won every aspect of my law suit.  SOS, S.C. simply ignored the suit, failing to respond in accordance with Rule of Procedure 12. The District Court of South Carolina refused, and to this date continues to refuse, to issue a court order confirming any aspect of my complaint which includes serious financial recovery.

Case documents prove beyond any reasonable doubt existence in South Carolina of extortion (a crime);  bribery (a crime); Hatch Act (1939) violations (a crime) by the score; serious manipulation of registration deadline dates enforcing denial of primary ballot access (a crime), and more.  Each state in the USA had identical or similar criminal and civil violations in place enforced by each political party ballot access during our 2016 primary election season; thus, ALL calendar year primary elections in the USA were rigged!  Regardless, the bottom line in South Carolina with certainty here and now is this:  The Republican Party Primary Election of 2016 in S.C. was a totally rigged event. 

Access to the primary election ballot in S.C. was blocked for all persons not hand-picked unless they followed this kind of instruction:  “You may show up but only if you shut up and pay up”!  Seventeen people paid-up and pledged allegiance in written notarized form to the Republican Party leadership.  Worse yet, perhaps, as a participant I would have to agree to (1) Violation of my 1st Amendment (freedom of speech) rights, my 14th and 24th Amendment rights (no payment of poll taxes), (2) accept S. C. government extortion demands, $40,000.00 in cash or certified check and paid immediately, complete with agreement that $20,000.00 of $40,000.00 would be shared, kicked- back by RPSC to unnamed S.C. government politicians, to include perhaps U. S. Senator Lindsay Graham, (R. SC), himself a candidate and on stage for the office of POTUS, a person with whom I would be competing for the position of POTUs, and for use by government of SC  in operating the polls on election day.  I refused to have my Constitutional Rights violated.  The 17 participants accepted violations of the identical Constitution they would take an oath to support and protect if elected.  I alone refused!   

Subsequent to being stonewalled totally by the Federal District Court, S.C., and by our Department of Justice, FBI, I approached the U.S. Supreme Court, on four (4) different occasions, March 4 through April 26, 2016, requesting enforcement of Article 3 of the U.S. Constitution.  The Supreme Court, operating with complete knowledge of gross dereliction of duty by the Southern District Court of South Carolina (failure to issue a Court Order), knowing no District Court order exists or existed, delayed my request for almost two months before announcing, by telephone, that I would have to appeal the non-existent Federal District Court, S.C. Court Order before it, the U.S. Supreme Court, could become involved.  Result:  our U. S. Supreme Court, by refusal to act supported the Federal District Court refusal to act.  Each Court disgraced itself by this dereliction of duty which is illegal, unconstitutional behavior.  No one can appeal a non-existent Court order!

Had I been permitted to exercise my Constitutional rights to appear on primary elections throughout the United States my solutions to immense problems facing us would have been presented to voters, in detail, a few of which in alphabetical order are as follows: 

  1. ABORTION:  No federal tax or borrowed money shall be allocated or spent anywhere for abortion;
  2. AGENCIES:  Many, perhaps most, government agencies have outlived their usefulness to taxpayers and shall be abolished entirely.  EPA shall be fully accountable to Congress, and NO agency shall have ability and/or authority to tax (mandate);
  3. AMENDMENT(S):  The Constitution shall be amended, including but not limited to one affecting residential real estate, as follows:  “No real estate property tax shall be imposed by any government or governmental unit on the primary residential property of any American citizen living in the United States of America”;
  4. AMERICAN ENGLISH:  We must learn to communicate better if we are to get along well with our large and growing population; thus, I shall ask Congress to declare American English as the official language in which all government business shall be conducted.  Too much gets lost in interpretation otherwise and the Constitution of the United States of America was written in English;
  5. BORDERS:  All borders shall be secured;
  6. COLLEGE STUDENTS:  Current fraudulent government policies of overcharging students exorbitant tuition fees and then lending them money to repay, knowing they can and never will repay shall be corrected quickly;
  7. COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF:  NO person touted as potential POTUS to date is qualified to serve as POTUS; thus, none of these people should be considered seriously for the job.
  8. EDUCATION:  “Common Core” to be abolished, plus numerous other changes such as creation of several additional Medical and Dental Schools;
  9. EMPLOYMENT, OUTPUT AND INCOME:  Citizens of the USA shall be given first priority in new job creation;
  10. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM:  Banking is the most important industry in every economy capitalist, socialist and communist.  The FED will be reorganized properly;
  11. DESALINATION OF OCEAN WATER:  Congress will be asked to finance research necessary to desalinate (no Salt) ocean water for domestic and foreign use;
  12. FOREIGN POLICY AND TRADE:   Foreign policy to include all trade and treaty obligations shall be addressed and handled properly; for example, the Iranian assault on our government to include destruction of our Embassy (1979) will be handled.
  13. GOD:  I want to pull the country together.  There is ONLY one God, He is has been and shall remain a mystery.  The Christian God; the Jewish God; the Muslim God is the legitimate “God” to believers.  Do not fight over which religious interpretation of His goodness and light is best, more correct, more sacred as though we were fourth grade boys shouting at one another, arguing over whether ‘my dad can beat-up your dad.”
  14. IMMIGRATION:  Our borders shall be secure;
  15. ISIS and armaments made available to ISIS by the Bush and Obama administrations shall be addressed and corrected.  No cash payments to hostile governments shall exist.
  16. JUSTICE:  The Department of Justice shall assure “liberty and justice for all.”  (Currently DOJ is only a legal department, not one of “justice” as guaranteed by our Constitution.  This condition shall change for the better).
  17. LANGUAGE:  American English shall be established as the official language in which all government business shall be conducted;
  18. MEDICAL/DENTAL CARE:  Obama Care shall be abolished and replaced with an alternative and properly financed medical and dental plan;
  19. MILITARY:  Our military needs support; thus, each governor will be asked to organize an all-volunteer, well disciplined, well equipped Militia;
  20. NASA:  The National Aeronautical and Space Administration shall be reorganized and properly financed;
  21. OIL: The Keystone Pipeline project concerning itself with oil transported from Canada will be completed promptly and with complete environmental protection;
  22. SECOND AMENDMENT:  All amendments to the U. S. Constitution shall be protected with major emphasis at this time on the Second Amendment, the RIGHT and responsibility to bear arms.  Freedom is not free;
  23. SOCIAL SECURITY:  The Social Security Act shall be amended and ALL senior citizens shall be secure in the knowledge that their entitlements are guaranteed and shall be paid in full and on time;
  24. TAXATION:  The Internal Revenue Code shall be amended resulting in a 7% tax rate on all income with no exceptions, exemptions and/or deductions.  We all play, we all pay; 
  25. VETERAN AFFAIRS: Almost immediately after taking office, the matter of proper treatment for veterans shall be addressed, and resolved;
  26. WORLD WAR III.  World war III has begun.  We are losing.  The names and personages of current enemies have changed since World Wars I and II and but their mission remains unchanged:  CONTROL OVER EVERYONE AND EVERTHING THAT MOVES.    Hitler wanted national socialist power with no identifiable national borders.  He wanted to walk in and take control everywhere while demanding ‘only’ “National Socialism” (NAZI).  He lost the battles but won the war because currently all of Europe is socialist and their minions are coming hard and fast after the USA.  Many USA enemies are within already.  By age, education, background, and experience Coyne is the only candidate qualified/capable of serving as commander-in-chief.

 I shall serve one term only – four years and out!  My suggestion for Vice President is female, early 50’s in age,  intelligent, well-educated, well-prepared, currently serving as senior executive (CEO) of a well-known company, one whose common equity (stock) is not-publicly-traded, and therefore not government controlled. If I do my job correctly she will be the first woman elected to POTUS four years hence!   I take no money from anyone, anywhere at any time for any reason.  Voters may expect me to serve ethically and with dignity, discipline, honesty, honor, integrity and, above all else with truthfulness, minimum standards of excellence necessary for a nation, its leaders, and its citizenry to foster and support if greatness is to be gained and maintained.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act MUST be destroyed and term limits must be created.  I am willing and able to discuss all of this with any person or audience willing to listen.  Please use the material in furtherance of positions taken already by your magnificent efforts to save the USA!
I have total confidence in your judgment. 

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for the Office
Of President of the
United States of America
www.coyne-assoc.com 


l. Significantly more on this subject later if you would like to include his mother who was 3 months pregnant when Barack Hussein Obama I agreed to sign his birth certificate, which he did, his grandmother, Madelyn, Executive Vice Pres., Bank of Hawaii, his foster father, Lolo Soetoro.

____________________

Commentary of July 29, 2016:  “Two Things to Understand,” by Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., (Financial Economist), and Candidate for the Office of President of the United States, 2016. ©

Each political party has chosen a preferred candidate.  We voters have no choice.  We are told to accept undesirable candidate A or undesirable candidate B.  Take it or leave it, again, as always; however, a small time frame of opportunity exists to change the situation.  We can insist upon placing the name of a totally qualified (not corrupt) person, an “Independent” candidate on the ballot.  The Democrat (D) and Republican Party(R) thought of this of course and, as always, have guarded against it.  They know: (1) In a democracy the majority does not rule; the best organized minority rules; and, (2) All elections are rigged by D&R, working together, at the federal, state and local level.  Demand an Independent candidate and, importantly, vote for no person at the federal, state or local level if s/he has been in office ten or more years!

The leadership of each party, D&R, is totally corrupt!  “Elite” persons in each party have bought and paid to control each candidate selected, A or B, above, and we should shout and cheer and vote and otherwise support that person?  No way!  If not stopped now, we the people our children and grandchildren for generations to come will suffer immeasurably as a result of D&R Party leadership’s successful grab for additional control and money in 2016. Worse yet, we may lose this wonderful country!  How awful!

Two political parties determine who shall have his/her name on the ballot and no one may get elected if s/he is not on the ballot.  Highly paid corrupt politicians have squirmed and “sleazed” their way into the leadership positions of each party.  These corrupt Party leaders determine who gets into office by deciding who they will allow to run for office.  Appointed Federal District Judges and appointed Supreme Court judges owe their lifetime employment, status and income to these corrupt D&R Party leaders and move tirelessly to support, defend and protect each corrupt politician; thus, our justice system is not working, is nothing more than a legal system dependent totally upon impeached, pedophile former president Bill Clinton’s claim that our laws depend only upon what one’s definition of ‘is,’ is.  The fundamental problem here in America is really that simple. 

Term Limits are needed at once, but professional life-long politicians must vote to limit their terms of office and they have no incentive, no intention of doing so.  Every politician has one goal only:  Get elected and reelected for life; no term limits! 

See two movies, read two books:  Books:  (1) “Hillary; the Other Woman, by Dolly Kyle; and, (2) Crisis of Character” by Gary Byrne.  Movies:  (1) “The Big Short,” (how government manipulates housing/Bond and Stock markets) and (2) “Spotlight,” (how "Church" protects it's pedophiles).

Get Tom Coyne on the ballot as your Independent candidate for POTUS!

____________________

Commentary of July 26, 2016:  “Abortion and the Republican Party and Democrat Party Platforms” by Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., (Financial Economist), and Candidate for the Office of President of the United States, 2016. ©

Absent in each major Party “Platform” is the subject of Abortion.  “Abortion” has a singular purpose, of course, the killing of an unborn child.  Each taxpayer/voter has a right to know what his/her ‘candidate’ will do once in office, and if s/he will finance abortion?  In addressing thousands of persons in Cleveland and Philadelphia, taxpaying American citizens could have given an understanding of their thoughts to each candidate by the candidate raising a few questions for the audience to answer:           

  1.  Do you think American taxpayers support abortion and do you think they wish to support it financially; if yes, raise your hand?
  2. Should I as a candidate support abortion publicly and should I agree to finance it once in elected public office; if yes, raise your hand?
  3. Should I as a candidate not support abortion publicly and should I agree not to finance it once in elected public office; if yes, raise your hand?
  4. Do you favor the killing of unborn children and as a taxpayer and as a citizen of the USA do you favor having government borrow money from China, and elsewhere, to pay for it; if yes, raise your hand?
  5. If you favor the killing of unborn children do you favor the killing of born children and as a citizen of the USA do you favor having government borrow money from China, and elsewhere, to pay for it; if yes, raise your hand?
  6.  Are you ashamed of how you feel and prefer for that reason not to raise your hand?
  7. If you have raised your hand to any of these questions please keep it raised for a few minutes so as to allow cameras scattered through the building adequate time to record your position(s).  We need to maintain a record of American sentiment in Cleveland and Philadelphia concerning abortion - for posterity.

Tens of millions of unborn children have been killed by abortion, 1973 to date.  Credible estimates (Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia and numbers provided by a former Research Institute of Planned Parenthood) say 75,000,000 (seventy-five million) persons.  Your position is critically important as it affects the life, liberty and ability to pursue happiness for many more millions of persons in the years to come.

I, Tom Coyne, love children, and support their Constitutional right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  I do not support abortion and as POTUS I shall sign no legislation into law that supports it financially.   What will Donald Trump and/or Hillary Clinton do and how do you know?  If the answer to this last question matters to you, do something positive about it.  Vote for “neither” or “none of the above” or somehow get Thomas Joseph Coyne on the ballot!  Vote Tom Coyne for POTUS!

________________________

FMCS Resume, Arbitrator # 1419; (Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service), Washington, D. C.; NMB (National Mediation Board), Washington, D. C.; also, other(s).
____________________

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.
                                   
Email is the preferred method of contact: tom@coyne-assoc.com; however, 535 Haskell Drive, Bath, Ohio 44333 is encouraged as well.  

CURRENT ACTIVITY: Candidate for the Office of President of the United States of America, 2016; Arbitration; Mediation; Financial Management & Securities; Author; Publisher; tenured full Professor of Finance (inactive).

FIRST BUSINESS ADDRESS:                                  SECOND BUSINESS ADDRESS:     

Coyne & Associates, Inc.                                            Coyne & Associates, Inc.       
535 Haskell Dr.                                                           (Captain Suite)
Akron, Ohio 44333                                                     300 Stoneheath Drive
Phone: (330) 836-0563                                                Barboursville, W. Va., 25504

EDUCATION:

Ph. D, Economics/Investments/Finance, Case Western Reserve University
          Post-doctoral study: Monetary Theory/Price Theory, University of Chicago
          Post-doctoral study: Computers, University of Michigan
MBA, Management/Finance, Kent State University
BBA, Accounting/Economics, Marshall University

ARBITRATION/LABOR RELATIONS/FINANCIAL NEGOTIAIONS EXPERIENCE:

I am a Ph.D. Financial Economist, and Candidate for the Office of President of the United States of America – POTUS. 

I served as Chief Negotiator, City and Local Boards of Education, State of Ohio, negotiated millions of dollars, hundreds of cases dealing heavily with finance. I have traveled extensively: Russia, Byelorussia, Latvia, Croatia, Holland, England, The Netherlands, Ireland, Brussels and other locations, lecturing and/or presenting papers in Finance, Economics and labor. .

I visited the former USSR in Latvia, Moscow, Leningrad, Minsk, and other Soviet locations as Leader of my Finance Delegation (36 persons) to the Soviet Union, and at U.S. State Department expense, to discuss our Federal Reserve system, interest rates on bonded indebtedness, plus other monetary and fiscal matters.  Our scheduled flight on Pan Am left New York without us.  Upon learning of this situation the USA head of Aeroflot USSR flew us first class to Shannon, Ireland, all expenses paid, on Aer Lingus, and arranged for a Soviet military plane loaded with rotationg Russian troops on their way home from Cuba to stop for us in Shannon.  That Soviet flight from Cuba to Ireland took my entire delegation from Shannon to Moscow.  (Soviet planes were not permitted to land in the USA at the time).  The Boards of Directors of each USSR bank – one in Moscow, the other in Leningrad - (yes, 2 banks only in all of USSR at the time with hundreds of thousands of branches each) were awaiting my arrival.  I met and spoke with Boris Yeltzin on this trip. 

My web site reveals most of my current professional activities:  www.coyne-assoc.com. I have served on expedited arbitration panels, as a permanent umpire for the U. S. Air Force, Heath, Ohio, and as fact finder for scores of education cases in the state of Ohio.

I am a former B&O railroad brakeman, having worked full time on the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad while studying full time at Marshall University, graduating in 3 years; I am a former C&O railway officer, working closely and significantly with Cyrus Eaton as we merged the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway with the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad.  I was hired by Mr. Eaton subsequent to receipt of my MBA from Kent State University, graduating in 2 years time while working full time at the B. F. Goodrich Co, and Eaton reading my Master’s Thesis:  “Proposals of the Railroads for Alleviation of their Financial Crisis,” copy available, Archives, University of Michigan Library, Ann Arbor, Michigan.  The merged railroad today is called CSX.  As an officer on CSX, I appeared before our Interstate Commerce Commission dealing with financial per diem rate cases of railroad cars.

I am a tenured, full-time, full professor of finance/economics at fully accredited (AACSB) universities.  I taught MBA students for 33 years. I have extensive experience with banking, stocks, bonds, T-Bills, notes and other financial matters, and have experience with the high profile, highly paid sports figure.  Subsequent to publication of my Ph.D. dissertation, Banking Structure in West Virginia,”  copy available, Archives, University of Michigan Library, Ann Arbor, Michigan, the State of West Virginia implemented state-wide branch banking.  Prior to State legislature persons reading my dissertation WV was the ONLY state in the USA disallowing branch banking.  I am eligible for Department of Defense and other government assignments. I have a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code number.

In Courts of Common Pleas in Ohio as well as Federal District Court I have testified as an expert witness concerning “churning” of financial securities, wrongful death and similar financial/economic cases.

I have served as money manager for a number of clients over a prolonged period of time, managing several millions of dollars for each, without losing any money for anyone, anywhere, at any time for any reason regardless of variation(s) in Business Cycle(s).   Common equity (stocks) and government, utility and private sector Bonds were favored by me.  I took one such client from $11.00 (eleven dollars) to $6,000,000 (six million dollars) before leaving while spending tens of thousands of dollars per project on client selected projects. No losses, no churning, no problem!

I am a licensed pilot; I hosted a live 50,000 watt call-in talk radio show broadcast simultaneously in Cleveland and Youngstown, Ohio.  I am available for foreign assignments.

I am a an honorably discharged combat veteran of the Korean Conflict, having served in Co. L., 180th Infantry Regiment, 45th Infantry Division, Sandbag Castle, Korea and am a recipient of the Korean Service Medal with two (2) Bronze Service Stars, the United Nations Service Medal, the National Defense Medal, the Combat Infantry Badge (CIB), the Good Conduct Medal, and a Letter of Appreciation from Kim Dae-jung, President of the Republic of Korea.

I am a former member of the National Association of Securities Dealers Association (NASD) Board of Arbitrators, a member of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service Board of Arbitrators, and a member of The National Mediation Board, Washington, D.C.

INDUSTRIES:

Aerospace; automotive, coal, education, mining, nuclear energy, police and fire, printing and publishing, railroads, rubber and tire, steel, transportation, plus just about all others, to include many permanent panels:  District 1199WVKYOH, SEIU, AFL-CIO, and Pride In Logan County, Inc., 9/1/2003 – 9/1/2006; Ohio Nurses Association and the Western Reserve Care System; National Bituminous Coal Producers Association and The United Mine Workers of America, District, #2, Pennsylvania; United States Air Force, Heath, Ohio; McDowell County Commission on Aging.

ISSUES: Being a Professor of Finance, I excel in properly locating, addressing and solving finance-related disputes arising as a result of planned albeit illegal (fraudulent) back-dating of employee date of hire time and location and years worked records for alleged pension(s) entitlement purposes.

Absenteeism, conduct (off-duty/personal), discipline non-discharge, discipline (discharge), sexual abuse of client, race, national origin, job posting/bidding, management rights, past practices, pension and welfare plans, retirement, seniority, subcontracting/contracting-out, tenure/reappointment, strikes, lockouts, work stoppages, slowdowns, cost-of-living pay, overtime pay, severance pay, vacation pay, work hours/ scheduled assignments, working conditions/work orders, violence or threats, plus others. 

PUBLISHED CASES:

At least 100 cases have been published, many of which are included on my web page:  www.coyne-assoc.com.Unless notified to the contrary, and in advance of the oral hearing, all Awards are submitted for publication consideration; moreover, as always, the case date of origin is simultaneous with submission of Joint Exhibits, if any. 

Books: (1) License to Lie, fiction, (ISBN: 0-9633192-2-1), 2000; (2) How to Take Charge of Yourself, Your Money, Your Government, college, non-fiction, (ISBN: 0-9633182-1-3), 1999; (3), (4), (5), (6), (7 ) Readings in Managerial Economics, college, 1973 through 1992, the best-selling book in its field at the time, (MBA), (ISBN: 0-9633192-0-5), 1973, with others, 1973, 1977, with others, 1981, 1985, and 1992; (8) Managerial Economics: Analysis and Cases Fifth Edition, college, (ISBN: 0-256-02698-X), 1984; and, (9) The Coyne Report: October 2011, (Revere Local Government Schools,), ISBN 9-781470-006433, 2011, plus numerous  (100’s) and other books such as (10) "Instructor's Manual, Managerial Economics: Analysis and Cases, Fifth Edition, 1985," 396 pages..

Articles:  Peer Reviewed - many, to include, for example, “Individually Selected Stocks versus Mutual Funds,” Personal Financial Planning, January/February, 1999; The Coyne Quarterly, Internet online with approximately 100 articles published 2002 to date: see www.coyne-assoc.com, (The Coyne Quarterly was published in hard copy prior to 2000). Well over 200 additional peer-reviewed and other articles have been published in finance and economic journals throughout the USA. A large number of newspaper articles/commentaries in the USA and abroad have been published.

PER DIEM FEE: $1,000.00; DOCKETING FEE: One per diem fee is payable in advance and credited to the parties as part of the final bill/invoice. 

CANCELLATION FEE: Almost never is a cancellation fee necessary and none is charged provided the oral hearing is cancelled early enough to fill the time slot; otherwise, one per diem fee.

Interest Arbitration, Fact-finding and Mediation: $1,000.00 per day with 5.5 hours comprising one day; travel time is charged one day each day needed; study time is charged one day for each day necessary; a flat-fee of $150 is charged for administrative expenses, to include telephone, postage and similar expenses.

Expenses: Arbitrator charges actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred (i.e. hotel, food, air travel). Automobile mileage is charged at the applicable IRS expense rate.

            This resume and fee schedule is forwarded to the parties immediately upon selection.

____________________

Commentary of July 15, 2016
“France Needs Our Help – Again – Imagine that” 
Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., ©
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for the Office of President of the United States, 2016

Approximately one hundred years ago, 1916, France pleaded for help from the USA:  World War I.  At tremendous cost in terms of lives lost and dollars spent the USA went to the rescue.  Seventy-four years ago, 1942, France pleaded again for help from the USA:  World War II.  At tremendous cost in terms of lives lost and dollars spent the USA went to the rescue.  Here we go again!  The USA is savior of world-wide economies, the absolute last line of defense against tyranny, but each time we succeed we are ridiculed and abused as being some kind of losers, over and over and over, relentlessly, until we are needed again that is.  Will we never learn?

The current situation in France is terrible.  A Muslim extremist terrorist killed scores of innocent persons whose only crime was being on holiday with family and friends; yet, outcry against him, and the IMAN from whom he was brainwashed remain conspicuous by their absence. 

A European tourist present at the scene (Nice, France) of the crime is quoted by international news media as having proclaimed how she cannot believe it, how could it happen, she asks, when the Promenade had signs clearly citing the road closed, not understanding, of course, when dealing with Muslim terrorists a ‘keep out’ sign is something closely akin in results to signs across the USA on school buildings saying ‘no guns’ are allowed.  Such signs, of course, are ignored and serve mostly as open invitations to cowards everywhere.

This most recent coward was from Tunisia we are told and well-known to police and/or other French authorities.  Each authority, in turn, could have and should have stopped him in his tracks.  No excuses at this late date are acceptable.  How?  French officials should have been carefully scrutinizing his bank deposits.  When he bought his guns did he use his ‘debit’ or credit card or did he pay cash.  Did he write a check?  Easy stuff to know and control if one knows anything of substance about commercial bank structure(s) and behavior.  Identical questions could have and should have been raised concerning the truck.  Was it leased, purchased of stolen?  Concerning his ammunition, unless stolen, it was paid through use of a bank.   Did he buy gasoline?  Ask the same questions. 

Want to stop murderous IMAN behavior, teaching and preaching?  Stop, cancel each IMAN credit and/or debit card!

The most important industry in every economy, capitalist, socialist or communist is the commercial bank.  Even Pope Francis knows this and watches closely his Bank of the Vatican.  The first order of business in 1933 by Chancellor Hitler was control of commercial banks, same as U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Nothing of substance occurs anywhere in the world without going through a commercial bank early in preparation of the event!

____________________

Profile of a Seditious Person, Commentary of July 10, 2016
Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., ©
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for the Office of President of the United States, 2016 

Sedition is the practice of using a nation’s language to incite one group of citizens to rise-up, to hate, to undermine law and order and established cultural standards of human behavior in opposition to other groups of citizens within the same country.  Seditious persons seek overthrow of legitimate, lawful, freely elected federal, state and/or local governments of the people, by the people and for the people.  A person practicing sedition is called seditious and may hide under the label of “community organizer.” 

The job of each seditious person is to undermine existing order within the nation, whatever it takes, pitting each identifiable demographic group against all other groups, homosexual against heterosexual persons, for example.  One uses hate language to direct people to find fault with other persons, older or younger persons, for example, or, perhaps, cause women to claim men hate them, or claim men make too much money, or have too much power, and so on.  The seditious person turns poorer educated and/or unhealthy persons against any and all persons better-off financially, educationally, or otherwise, however defined.  Quite often the hate-filled person depicts him/herself as one innocently exercising nothing more that his/her Freedom Speech rights guaranteed under the 1st Amendment of our U.S. Constitution – itself being the greatest document ever written!  The job of a seditious/community organizer is made easy if s/he has a license to lie.  With ease one could use sedition to turn Black Americans against White Americans!  A glib, properly tutored astute community organizer can use our weapons against us as does ISIS currently, which uses our guns, trucks, missiles, and other war-like materials and, money, things we conveniently “forgot” to bring home when we withdrew from military action(s) in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and similar places.  And remember:  our planes were used to bring down our World Trade Center in similar manner. 

Sedition can turn a rich, free, happy, educated nation such as the highly successful United States of America into a poorer unhappy downtrodden socialist one, something similar to the failed USSR, North Korea, China, Venezuela, Cuba, and so on.   During transition the seditious leader smiles warmly while telling citizens to get used to it, worse is yet to come.  When Germany started World War II by attacking unarmed Poland it demanded nothing more than National Socialism (NAZI).  Germany lost War II, but sits now in charge of a failed EURO and the failed European Economic Union of which all members are of 100% socialist nations.

Sedition is treason, a violation of one’s allegiance to the flag, its traditions and citizens.  A treasonous person has no allegiance to his country.  Treason is cowardly betrayal!  A person guilty of treason supports enemies of his/her state.  Sedition ruins a country from within, it’s intended goal.  Sedition is treachery! One guilty of treason cannot be tolerated by civil society. 
____________________                 

July 1, 2016

Elaina E. Goodrich, James N. Nelson, Becky Corbett, Trustees
BATH TOWNSHIP OHIO
3864 W. Bath Road/P.O. Box 1188
Bath, Ohio 44210-1188

Re:  Continued Bath Township Trustee Abrasive Abuse of Power and Position

Dear Persons to Whom Citizens Have Entrusted Too Much:

On June 27, 2016 I was notified of your decision to establish a trash collector for my residence, a decision historically made by me.  I decide who comes to my home, not you! 

Your selection of who/what/why I am permitted to have on my property is unacceptable.  It shall not be tolerated.  Your authoritarian notification to me came within days of its implementation.  By what AUTHORITY do you tell any citizen who may come to his/her house at any time and/or what the person coming may take away with him?  Maybe next month I will receive notification naming my “sole” pizza delivery boy, or my “sole” M.D. permitted to visit or my “sole” television or telephone service government permits me to use? As with government persons at all levels you are out of control!  It is not by coincidence that two-thirds (Westside Leader) of all communities in the area decided on the same date to grab additional money, power and control, to include financial kick-backs?  ESTABLISH AN ALTERNATIVE DROP-OFF POINT FOR ME TO USE IF I MUST DISPOSE OF MY OWN GARBAGE – AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL YARD NEAR THE PAPER DROP POINT? 

The “new” trash carts were not ordered by me but remain now my personal property.  I have yet to decide what to do with them.  Should I sell them on eBay?  Immediately, I called your trash “executive” and he promised someone within the hour would remove the unwanted and unordered carts, but he failed to do so.  The same “executive” assured me, wrongly, I would not be required to use the trash collector you honored.  The business arrangement you made is somewhat reminiscent of Bath Trustee’s Joint Economic Development District (JEDD), an un-American, anti-American piece of legislation requiring “Taxation without Representation.” We fought and won the Revolutionary War to prohibit taxation without representation legislation but it appears Bath Trustees Don Jenkins and Jim Nelson succeeded in making a disgraceful grab for additional controls of power and money, badly hindering persons at Lowe’s and elsewhere financially who are attempting to pay Government University of Akron and Kent State Government University tuition(s)? Are Bath “trustees” worthy of our confidence, of our trust?  Are you three trustees trustworthy?

People in my neighborhood are incapable of handling the huge “new” carts.  Some of these people cannot get so much as to and from the mailbox on winter days.  Most certainly, these same people are incapable of following precise instructions for plastics, glass cartons, metal cans, paper while they face the cart wheels and handles precisely within 3 feet of one another and of mailboxes, and so on!  Clearly, you three people may have lost your collective minds?

The only real obligation (authority) you have as “Trustees” is to protect citizens and collect the garbage, and shovel the snow.  Police and Fire personnel must be well paid and totally respected, and they are well worth all we can pay.  Ditto for Bath Service Department personnel, of which I have met many.  These are fine, hard-working dedicated and trustworthy persons; however, their reputations suffer badly when trustee “bosses” are out of control! 

If you feel the need to control something additional develop a system of collecting leaves fallen from trees during “fall” of each year.  We need help in that area.  We are free to make our own decisions concerning everything else!

If you want to meet and discuss anything cited here let me know.  I will make myself available.

Most Sincerely,

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
(Candidate for POTUS, 2016)

____________________

June 17, 2016

The Honorable Terry L. Wooten
Chief U. S. District Judge
Matthew J. Perry, Jr. Courthouse
901 Richland Street
Columbia, S. C. 29201

Re:  Civil AND CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (Reference Number DA300520412)

Dear Judge Wooten:

On September 15, 2015 an “Injunction, Emergency/Expedited Motion, U. S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH,”  written September 10, 2015, was filed and hand-delivered by me personally.  Appropriate copies were served in a timely manner to all relevant parties.  Two defendants were named:  (1) South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton (sic) Street; Suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 29201; and, (2) South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201.

After exchange of motions with co-defendant Republican Party of South Carolina (RPSC) my motion for Summary Judgment was submitted to the Columbia S.C. court on December 21, 2015 (Magistrate Judge Hodges).  This motion for Summary Judgment was ignored.  No court order was issued and elections for POTUS would be over if I had no court order to follow and/or appeal. After unreasonable, unfair and illegal court delays, I learned over the phone (A) no court order would be forthcoming; (B) The Republican Party itself would fail totally when an order is given in my favor.  Written documents with the Court and filed by co-defendant RPSC cite this language.  I have no remedy at law and have incurred serious professional and financial damages due to ‘lower’ court assistance to a political party and intervention against me.   

Article 3 of the U.S. Constitution mandates the U.S. Supreme Court as the point of origin for disputes involving states.  South Carolina is a state.  Between March 4 and April 26, 2016 I contacted them four times in writing.  They contacted me mostly by phone and by letter telling me what to read and, mostly, dragging out the time while I continued to stress “time is of the essence;” after all, I was seeking “Emergency Application for Individual Relief.” 

My motion was rejected by phone and letter (Scott S. Harris, Clerk, and Mara Silver).  Plaintiff docket fee was returned when I asked after the third effort.   The message ‘bottom line’ from the Supreme Court was:  Go through the lower courts.  If you do not like the District Court order, appeal it.  If you dislike the Appellate Court order, then contact us again.  The Supreme Court decided all of this knowing NO ‘LOWER’ COURT ORDER to follow or to appeal existed and the ‘Supremes’ could have refused me immediately instead of helping defendant by delaying their decision from March 4 through April 26, 2016.  Additionally, Article 3 of my Constitution says the Supreme Court is the correct Court of origin in this case.  I have incurred serious professional and financial damages as a direct result of intentional delays instituted by the Supreme Court. 

EXTORTION:  It was extortion (a crime) (when elected and appointed government employees of the State of South Carolina demanded (mandated) $40,000 from me, payable immediately and in cash or certified check, and accompanied by a signed, notarized and written pledge to support decisions made by the ‘leader’ of the private not-for-profit  organization (RPSC) to whom I was told to give the money.  I refused to pay;   

BRIBERY:  It was bribery (a crime) to and of and for government elected and appointed officials when the State of South demanded, but failed to obtain from me, cooperation in financial kick-backs of $20,000 (one-half of the $40,000) by a private not-for-profit organization (RPSC) to unnamed elected and appointed government officials.  U. S. Senator Lindsay Graham, himself a candidate for the office of POTUS, would be paid part of the $20,000?  I refused to cooperate;

HATCH ACT:  It was violations of the Hatch Act of 1939 (a crime) when an elected and nationally known politician used a government auto, whether leased or bought by government, for campaign purpose, or used travel cards issued for state business if s/he is an elected or appointed state government employee, or used state of Ohio or elsewhere cell phones and state employees to further his/her campaign.  Salaried public employees may not receive payment nor may they on a volunteer basis at no additional cost use the power and position of their appointed or elected office to help or hinder a political party (RPSC) or a political candidate.  Plaintiff was harmed badly by the Republican Party change of date and Hatch Act violations for the 2016 Primary election in S.C.;

RIGGED ELECTION(S):  It was establishment of a rigged election (a crime) when the RPSC and State of South Carolina conspired successfully to change (shortened by 20 days) the time to register for the Republican Party Primary election, and to do so with little or no notice to anyone but political insiders such as South Carolina Senator Lindsay Graham.   Each party to the conspiracy was well paid for changing the deadline date.

It was establishment of a rigged election when $20,000 of the $40,000 I was told to pay would go to pay persons who would manage and work at the polls on Election Day thereby causing me to pay a Poll Tax in violation of my 14th and 24th Amendment rights.  I refused to allow and/or agree to RPSC and State of South Carolina demands that I surrender Constitutional rights (the 1st and 14th and 24th), especially in view of the fact that as POTUS I shall take a solemn oath to God Almighty that I will protect, defend and support the Constitution of the United States of America.

OTHER:  Relevant ‘Motions’ and correspondence are on my web page ; thus, without explaining additionally criminal and civil violations at this time and in such short space I ask you to visit my web page:  www.coyne-assoc.com.    

I am entitled to have my name of the ballot for POTUS in the election in November, 2016 as an Independent Candidate, inasmuch as the Republican Primary is finished and the U. S. District Court system and the Supreme Court of the United States refused to do what each swore to God Almighty s/he would do.

I am entitled to substantial but reasonable compensation for the crimes against me, such crimes resulting in my not being able to take part in national debates and otherwise compete for the Office of President in the Republican Party primary elections.

I am entitled to recovery of court costs and travel costs in addition to punitive and real financial damages because of these crimes.

Please contact me for additional information as needed.  Also, thank you for your anticipated effort(s)!

Most Sincerely,

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for the Office of President
              Of the United States (POTUS)
__________________

Certificate of Service:  This letter was sent this date via the U. S. Postal System:

  1. Honorable Justices John Roberts, J., Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan; also, Scott S. Harris, Clerk, and Mara Silver, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, OFFICE OF CLERK, Washington, D. C. 20543-0001;
  2. The Honorable Governor, Nikki Haley, 1205 Pendleton Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  3. The Honorable Attorney General Wilson, P. O. Box 11549, Columbia, S. C. 29201;
  4. Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI Columbia, 151 West Park Boulevard, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  5. SOS, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendleton Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  6. South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  7. Correspondence Management Staff, Office of Administration, Criminal Division, Case # DA300520412, U. S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530;
  8. United States District Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite # 500, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  9. Other(s).

Secretary of State, Columbia, SC was the only other defendant but SOS has no legal standing in the case at this time as SOS failed to respond in accordance with Civil Rules of Procedure 12; regardless, my complaint is criminal as well as civil in nature.

Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Judge, Federal District of Northern West Virginia (Wheeling), abused the power and position of his office when Plaintiff attempted to get on the ballot for Governor, 2004.  Stamp found from his bench in favor of Plaintiff but when his written order was issued he found for West Virginia life-long professional politicians.  U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Hubbs Rehnquist was at his residence studying Plaintiff’s appeal the night he died.  It appears Ted Cruz may have been the Rehnquist chief of staff at the time; regardless, my original files were demanded and delivered by me in the parking lot of the Supreme Court building in accordance with orders received by me from a chief of staff.  Nothing further was heard from the U.S. Supreme Court.  My original files remain with the Supreme Court?  As with Associate Justice Antonin Gregory Scalia, as I recall, sadly no autopsy was announced as having been done on Chief Justice Rehnquist.

____________________

MEMORIAL DAY, USA, 2016,
“They Died in Vain”  ©
Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for POTUS

An estimated sixteen million innocent people (16,000,000) died in Germany’s World War I, a military conflict attempting to control equally (socialist) everyone and everything in Europe. Germany lost the war, was fined financially and heavily in 1919, (post-War I meetings, Versailles), but reneged when it came time to pay. 

Germany declared itself the “Master Race” and invaded Poland on September 1, 1939.  The formerly disarmed Poles were conquered in forty days (40) which started World War II, a NAZI (National Socialist) conflict of unbelievable horror. It cost an estimated sixty million innocent lives (60,000,000).  Leadership provided by Winston Churchill plus financial and military support from the greatest generation of Americans ever to serve defeated National Socialism in 1945, but temporarily only.

In 1957 at The Maas Holiday Inn, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Germany ‘chaired’ a meeting of its former war victims. Each such formerly defeated country signed onto a new socialist (fascist) plan promising peace and prosperity for all of Europe. The European Economic Union along with a failed unit of account, EURO, had its beginning at this meeting. The plan: follow Benito Mussollini's faschism scheme, one of taking government control of private corporations by allowing government pension plans to vote corporate proxies (proxy voting), the private property of workers. Unknown to most American citizens the USA follows that plan today.

Two points:  (1) National and International Socialists never stop trying to force views onto others. Only one difference exists between Communism and Socialism: Communists take power by use of rifle butt and fixed bayonet; Socialists take power by manipulation of the ballot box. Every election in the USA is rigged and in a similar manner! Heavy use of deceit, deception, dishonesty and fraud, plus aggression, riots and other violence takes hold throughout the country as needed by communists/socialists to win as evidenced by current Democrat candidates seeking continued power and control. (2)  Socialism is (A) theoretically sound, (B) capable of gaining and retaining widespread public support, but (C) socialism does not work:  Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela et al.

Memorial Day is designed to honor military persons who died protecting freedom and democracy throughout the world.  Veterans being honored gave all they had including life itself.  Our nation asked nothing in return other than enough space to bury our dead, but our veterans died in vain! Military personnel surviving combat died later of war-related mental and/or physical illness.

We have an Imposter President, 2008 to date (Kenyan born Obama/Soetoro), a Republican Party engaging openly in bribery of government politicians and other employees, extortion, manipulation of access to the ballot box, Hatch Act (1939) violations by the score, demands that Candidates for POTUS surrender Freedom of Speech rights (Amendment I) and sign a notarized pledge of allegiance to political party “leaders,” surrender rights (Amendments 14 and 24) which disallow poll taxes, all the while knowing poll taxes exist, are collected, are racist and illegal.  Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Corporation (RICO) laws are violated with impunity.  To their everlasting desgrace our (USA) Federal District Courts, and the United State Supreme Court, support this entire illegal, immoral, unconstitutional process in violation of a solemn oath(s) of office taken by each judge before we granted each ‘judge’ the privilege of accepting his/her appointment.  These Supreme "justices" are NOT elected by anyone, anywhere! 

Enjoy Memorial Day with a hot dog and beer or two in the back yard while our socialist leaders continue to party with champagne and caviar at your expense.

A Coyne-operated White House shall create jobs, guarantee social security payments, protect our borders, solve illegal immigration, finance faculty pay and student loans correctly, and much more. Coyne agrees to serve four years only!

God Bless America!

____________________

April 26, 2016
                             
Honorable Justices John Roberts, Jr., Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan,
Scott S. Harris, Clerk; and, Mara Silver                                       
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Office of Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re:  Emergency Application of Individual Relief, Fourth Request (3/4/16; 2nd 3/21/16; 3rd 3/30/16).

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the Supreme Court:

Regarding your letter dated April 11, 2016 (Scott S. Harris/Mara Silver) you claim, incorrectly, earlier rejection of my application was explained in a letter and/or phone call(s).  To date you have ignored State of  South Carolina co-conspirator and co-defendant, the Republican Party of South Carolina (RPSC). 

You say I should go through the Court system, (Federal District Court, Columbia, S.C.) and appeal the resulting Court order, if necessary, before approaching you.  My suit was filed 9/15/2015, but (1) The Federal Court in Columbia has failed to issue a court order, and (2) time is of the essence.  The clock continues to run.  Even when I win in District and/or Appellate Court it is worthless as national election for POTUS will have been concluded.  Continued delays are unacceptable, unreasonable, unfair and in total violation of your oath(s) of office.  Please enforce Article 3 of the Constitution.  Do not allow time delays associated with Court self-serving ‘rules’ to permit continued corruption and abuse of power and position by corrupt government persons and their co-conspirator, RPSC

RPSC is guilty of extortion, bribery of government officials, manipulation of deadline dates, Hatch Act violations by the score, violation of my 1st, 14th and 24th Amendment rights, RICO violations, to name only a few of its crimes.  Each Supreme Court member swore to uphold Plaintiff’s Article 3 Constitutional rights.  Please measure-up to your responsibilities.   

The Republican Party has deprived me thus far of my Constitutional right to appear on Republican primary ballots for POTUS in the 2016 elections.  The Supreme Court must order placement of my name on the ballot nationally as an “Independent” candidate for POTUS in the general elections of November, 2016, plus order payment by RPSC to me of appropriate financial damages.

“If you can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen.” 1

With great respect and many thanks,

(Signed)

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for the Office of President,
      United States of America
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333
(330) 836-0563
(330) 957-7962
____________________

Certificate of service:  This letter (motion) was sent this date via the U.S. Postal System to: 

  1. The Honorable Governor, Nikki Haley, 1205 Pendelton Street, Columbia, South Carolina, 29201; 
  2.  The Honorable Attorney General Wilson, P. O. Box 11549, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  3. SOS, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  4. South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  5. Bowers Law Office, Post Office Box 5054, Columbia, South Carolina 29250;
  6. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina, 20201;
  7. United States District Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite # 500, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  8. Attorney General of the United States of America, Department of Justice, Room 5111, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001;
  9. Federal Bureau of Investigation Columbia, 151 West park Boulevard, Columbia, South Carolina 29210.  See DOJ Criminal Case File # 311916;

(10)Other(s).
____________________

1 President Harry S. Truman

____________________

April 4, 2016 

“Should a Woman be punished for having an abortion, ‘yes’ or ‘no’” was a question asked of Donald Trump, and discussed a few days later by Hillary Clinton.  The question is biased and requires (1) a basic knowledge of biology, and (2) an understanding of human morality.  The sole purpose of abortion is to kill the unborn child; otherwise, no abortion would take place.  Two schools of thought exist.      

School of Thought I:  If the alive, unborn child is thought by the mother to be a “person”, the answer is “yes;” it is a crime (punishable) to intentionally kill another person.  It is a crime to pay someone to kill another person on your behalf.  The doctor, nurse, or Planned Parenthood provider is subject to criminal penalties.  Our Constitution of the United States guarantees “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” to all.  This School of Thought is correct!

School of Thought II:  If the mother believes the unborn child is not a “person”, believes the child to be a small mass of fetal tissue to be disposed of in whatever manner, it is not a crime (not punishable).  Mother believes abortion is a form of birth control?  If the aborting mother truly believes the fetal mass is nothing more than trash under the worst of circumstances, saleable to researchers under better circumstances, she may be functioning with a clear conscience.  Nothing serious happened she may think.  This School of Thought is incorrect! 

 Examine your conscience! If you have involved yourself in an abortion, into which School of Thought do you belong?  The answer may be rhetorical to some persons, but not to you. It is a soul-searching matter of conscience question for you.

It is always wrong to harm a child and a child in the womb is the most innocent of persons among us.  What kind of person among us would harm an innocent child, and who among us thinks government should borrow or spend taxpayer money to cause death intentionally? Each “person” is created at conception, but not everyone agrees.  After all, murder and suicide have been with us for a long time. Even young Japanese Kamikaze pilots were sent (they thought) to death by ‘god’ on suicide bomb missions, flying planes into American ships.  Seventy-two years ago (War II) Japanese military and civilian persons believed their “emperor,” was ‘god’ because he, the emperor, proclaimed himself to be ‘god’. 

Similar misdirected young Muslim extremist men and women terrorist suicide bombers exist today, and for the same incorrect ‘Japanese” reason:  belief in a knowlingly false sense of direction dictated by self-declared ‘gods.’ These Muslim extremist suicide bombers are trained (brainwashed) to believe they are doing as their conscience and their political/religious "god-like leaders” dictate.  The Emperor Wears No Clothes again, perhaps?  Seventy-two years from today will any sane person understand?   

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D. ©
(Financial Economist)
(Candidate for the Office of President of the USA)

____________________

March 30, 2016
                             
Honorable Justices John Roberts, Jr., Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan,
Scott S. Harris, Clerk; and, Mara Silver                                       
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Office of Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re:  Emergency Application of Individual Relief, Third Request (3/4/16; 2nd 3/21/16)

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the Supreme Court:

Regarding US Code 1251 – Original Jurisdiction – (b) “The Supreme Court shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of:  “(3) All actions or proceedings by a State (South Carolina) against the citizens of another State (Coyne of Ohio),precisely the situation in this case. 
 
Amendment XI speaks to the issue of judicial power not being construed to extend to any suit in law or equity against one of the States (South Carolina) by citizens of another state (Coyne); however, Amendment 11 deals with proceedings of citizens of another state, Coyne from Ohio, against a State, such as South Carolina, but this case deals with the State of South Carolina, against Coyne of Ohio.  Coyne is defending himself!  Nothing more!  Every citizen has a right to defend himself from abusive government.

The State of South Carolina, Office of Secretary of State, and co-defendant Republican Party of S.C., were sued by Plaintiff, Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D., in Federal District Court, Columbia, S.C. on 9/15/2015.  It was Civil Action 3:15cv-4669-JFA-SVH.  The suit was necessary to stop government violation of Coyne’s Constitutional rights.  Please defend Constitutional Rights.  Every citizen is allowed (required) to defend himself against out-of-control government persons.  Our Constitution exists for no reason other than defense against governmental abuse of power and position! 

“Hatch Act” (1939) and other violations by the score exist in this case and continue to be ignored.  The assigned appointed magistrate judge has failed to issue an order in favor of “Plaintiff Motion for Summary Judgment” despite its correctness and despite having more than adequate time to do so.  Additional District Court delays serve to perpetuate additional government corruption in national elections, as intended by persons wanting no involvement from outsiders in allegedly free and open national elections for POTUS in South Carolina, and elsewhere.  The Supreme Court is in position here and now to stop this corruption.  

South Carolina State government, serves and has served as a collection agency for hundreds of thousands of dollars in poll taxes on behalf of RPSC, a tax-free, 501-c-4 private organization, which,  in turn, kicks-back 50% of revenue collected to persons in S.C. State government while simultaneously telling Plaintiff, and telling the Southern District Court of South Carolina, Plaintiff has no right to be on the ballot in S.C. as he does not live in S.C., is not a citizen of S.C., and is not registered to vote in South Carolina.  Illegal “arrangements” between SOS and RPSC are collusion, of course, but are rife as well with extortion, bribery, fraud, and major RICO violations (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations), all of which are designed to control who get onto the ballot and therefore who gets elected to high public office. 

One cannot get elected if s/he is not on the ballot.  By controlling who gets his/her name onto the ballot, SOS and RPSC control who gets elected.  My country, your country suffers as a direct result!  Each State in the USA does the same or similar thing (Arkansas requires a $27,000 poll tax to gain entry to their primary election).  Additionally, the Democrat Party behaves similarly.    

SOS, South Carolina, in default of civil procedure 12, and therefore with no standing in Civil Action 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH, illegally filed additional motions with the Southern District of South Carolina Court.  Wrongly, each motion was considered and acted upon by the Magistrate judge.  Intentional delay was the motive.  If The Court assists defendants by helping facilitate delays in this manner, until elections are concluded, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment when won in court becomes meaningless, moot, precisely as planned by defendants and by Southern District Court of South Carolina.  These additional delays are financially and otherwise damaging to Plaintiff while being beneficial to defendants. These delays are criminal as well as civil.

SOS made no appearance, offered no response, no legal defense and totally ignored Plaintiff arguments and Civil Rule of Procedure 12 for more than 60 days.  RPSC made an appearance in compliance with Civil Rule 12, agreed with Plaintiff regarding S.C. government demands for payment by Plaintiff of a $40,000 tax, payable by Plaintiff to RPSC, co-conspirator with SOS.  Plaintiff was to provide a notarized pledge of allegiance to RPSC, a signature required in violation of Plaintiff’s First Amendment rights, and the $40,000 in cash or certified check, after which Plaintiff could have his name on the Primary ballot in S.C. for POTUS in the 2016 general elections.  Plaintiff refused!

$20,000 of the $40,000 collected by RPSC was retained by RPSC.  The other $20,000 was for South Carolina government persons, for staffing and managing the polls (a poll tax, or other tax in violation of Amendment 14), in violation also of Amendment 24.  Plaintiff’s only defense was to refuse all such illegal, unconstitutional demands!  No citizen is required to surrender Constitutional rights as pre-condition to run for office in a free open democratic society.

As a matter of justice and good conscience the U. S. Supreme Court MUST abide by 28 U.S. Code 1251 and take Original Jurisdiction as requested herein.  Adverse parties include:  (1) the Southern District Court for South Carolina, and (2) the Republican Party of South Carolina.   

The proceedings here were originated by the State of South Carolina on behalf of the Republican Party of South Carolina, against Plaintiff, against Coyne, a private citizen from another state (Ohio).  It happened when S. C. State Election Board (SCSEB) told Coyne he could not appear on the ballot for POTUS in SC without violating his Constitutional rights (Amendments 1, 14 and 24).  The SOS commissions each SCSEB member.  SOS members may be recipients of all or part of the financial kick-backed $20,000?  No person exists at SCSEB without being commissioned by SOS.  SOS is in control of SCSEB membership.   My effort is one of self-defense!  I will not participate anywhere with financial kick-backs!

Without Supreme Court intervention and protection I have no remedy, nothing exists at law.  The umbrella of protection provided to State governments by Amendment XI of our Constitution is inapplicable here as the State of South Carolina originated a proceeding against citizen Coyne.  Only if a citizen originates a complaint against a State does Amendment 11 help the state hide financial wrongdoings.  Amendment 11 cannot be extended to recognize and reward financial bribes made by a tax-exempt private organization (RPSC) to State government employees (SOS).  Bribery of government employees and efforts made by government employees to help a political candidate or political party (RPSC) violate the Hatch Act.  RICO violations are involved as are the overall manipulation(s) of national elections for the Office of President of the United States of America.  Being “first in the south,” South Carolina set the standard for widespread fraud throughout the nation in 2016 Primary Elections.  This fraudulent behavior existed not only in South Carolina but throughout the nation (i.e., Arkansas and others) at this critical, pivotal time in our nation’s history.  This case provides the U.S. Supreme Court with an opportunity to restore honesty, truthfulness, integrity, normalcy to our culture!  American Blacks are getting the worst of it currently.

 I am not Black but no American citizen, Black or white, can meet the artificial constraints in place to control who gets elected to high public office from South Carolina. The Supreme Court is dealing here with a very serious civil offense, and a criminal offense of major national and international (foreign policy) consequence.  Blacks may comprise 50% of all eligible voters in South Carolina.  A Coyne-operated White House shall insure “liberty and justice for all,” demanding and obtaining a legitimate Department of Justice, something markedly different from our current Department of Legal Affairs, but only if he gets onto the ballot nationwide.     

I deserve to have my name on the ballot nation-wide for the Office of President of the United States of America, without having to pledge allegiance to anyone, anywhere, and without having to pay poll taxes.  In August, 2015 the Federal Election Commission was alerted and in October, 2015 each Republican Party Chair and each Secretary of State for each state in the nation was alerted to my registration seeking election to POTUS.  I pledge allegiance only “to the flag of the United States of America . . . .”  I accept no money from anyone. 

I am asking you to issue an appropriate Supreme Court order as soon as possible allowing me to compete fairly for the Office of President in the 2016 elections.  Included in a favorable Order from this Court allowing my involvement in the race for POTUS should be recovery of court costs and travel expenses associated with this defense of my Constitutional rights, and other financial relief, if any, as deemed appropriate by the Court.  Such money will be accepted and used if and when necessary in my campaign after which all (100%) remaining money shall be donated to a charity of my choosing. 

As I understand the situation you require a personal check for $300.00 for this motion to docket, or similar.  It is attached.     

Thank you!        

With Respect,

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
(Candidate for the Office of President of the United States)

____________________

Certificate of service:  This letter (motion) was sent this date via the U.S. Postal System to: 

  1. The Honorable Governor, Nikki Haley, 1205 Pendelton Street, Columbia, South Carolina, 29201; 
  2.  The Honorable Attorney General Wilson, P. O. Box 11549, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  3. SOS, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  4. South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  5. Bowers Law Office, Post Office Box 5054, Columbia, South Carolina 29250;
  6. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina, 20201;
  7. United States District Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite # 500, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  8. Attorney General of the United States of America, Department of Justice, Room 5111, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001;
  9. Federal Bureau of Investigation Columbia, 151 West park Boulevard, Columbia, South Carolina 29210.  See DOJ Criminal Case File # 311916;

(10)Other (s).
____________________

March 21, 2016

The Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas
Scott S. Harris, Clerk
Mara Silver
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
WASHINGTON, DC 20543-0001
(Emergency Relief Application Office)

Re:  Emergency Application for Individual Relief, Second Request, (Initial Request, 3/4/2016)

Dear Justice Thomas et al:

The “grounds upon which this Court’s jurisdiction is invoked” is the U. S. Constitution, Article III, Section. 2. Paragraph 2; to wit:  “In all Cases affecting . . . those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme (sic) Court shall have original jurisdiction.”  The State of South Carolina is Party to this case, plus co-defendant the Republican Party of South Carolina. 

The State of South Carolina, office of Secretary of State, made no appearance, answered no Plaintiff questions/complaints for more than the 60 days required by Civil Rule of Procedure 12, and made no legal defense for more than 60 days; more than 60 days after 9/15/2015 SOS filed a Motion for Dismissal in the case.  Being in default, SOS has no legal standing in the case, (total violation of Civil Rules of Procedure 12); however, in compliance with your letter, SOS, is receiving notice of service of this Application as is Republican Party South Carolina, each by U.S. Postal Service, Certified mail, Return Receipt Requested. 

Republican Party of South Carolina (A) made appearance; (B) answered Plaintiff complaint with respect to violations of Amendments I, 14, and 24 of the U. S. Constitution, The Hatch Act, plus other violations and, importantly, agreed with Plaintiff concerning financial kick-backs of $20,000 per Candidates for POTUS by Republican Party to State of South Carolina government officials.  (The office of SOS appoints five persons to serve as the S. C. State Election Board; yet, the names of particular persons in receipt of this cash remains unclear, who in particular, what warm bodies, received in excess of $400,000.00 in this year’s (2016) Republican Party Primary election)?  Plaintiff being a non-insider in the bid for POTUS has no authority to issue subpoenas necessary in S. C. to identify more precisely numerable spurious financial arrangements between S. C. and Republican Party.

The form of relief sought:  I respectfully ask the Supreme Court to issue a Court order proclaiming:  The name of Plaintiff, my name, Thomas Joseph Coyne, (A) shall be on every ballot in each State and Territory in the United States of America for the Office of President of the United States in timely enough fashion for me to have a chance at winning the Office of POTUS in 2016; and, (B) the name of Thomas Joseph Coyne, myself, shall be rewarded reasonable financial compensation by (1) the Republican Party of South Carolina, Office of Nat Moore, and (2) the State of South Carolina, Office of Secretary of State, Mark Hammond, and the United States District Court, District of South Carolina, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 20201, complete with additional financial penalties for intentional delays involved in handling Civil Action 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH for violations of Coyne’s Constitutional Rights.  

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
(Candidate for the Office of POTUS, 2016)

____________________

Copies sent by U.S. Postal Service, Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, as Certificate of Service to:

  1.  South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street, suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 2901;
  2. South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina, 29201;
  3. Bowers Law Office, Post Office Box 5054, Columbia, South Carolina 29250;
  4. United States District Court, District of South Carolina, 901 Richland Street, Columbia. South Carolina, 20201;
  5. United States District Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite # 500, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  6. Attorney General of the United States of America, Department of Justice, Room 5111, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 20530-0001;
  7. Other(s).

 

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas J. Coyne, Ph.D.,
(Candidate for the Office of President of the USA)

_______________________

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARCH 17, 2016 ©

The United States of America is in chaos currently, due heavily to corruption in government at all levels, federal, state and local.  The final arbitrator of meaningful disputes is the Supreme Court and much controversy exists concerning how to fill vacancies and how many vacancies to fill.  This comment provides a workable solution.  Legislation must be passed as follows: 

“Section 1.  The Supreme Court of the United States of America shall consist of five persons at all times, no less than two of whom shall be non-lawyers, effective immediately upon presidential signature of this legislation. 

Section 2.  Members serving currently are exempt from this mandate.”

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D., ©
(Financial Economist)
(Candidate for the Office of President of the United States)

____________________

ELECTION DAY, 2016, BATH TOWNSHIP, OHIO, MARCH 15, 2016:

I am Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D., (Financial Economist), Candidate for Office of President of the United States of America (POTUS), Registered Voter for forty-four (44) years under the same name and at the same address, possessing and presenting a valid United States of America Passport, complete with requisite photo and all proper certification(s) but denied my right today at approximately 4:20 PM to vote in today's Primary Election for POTUS. The "official" in charge of the sign-in at my poll booth knew I was registered with the Federal Election Commission for the Office of POTUS, but refused to accept my Passport as proper identification. She claimed my Passport failed to include my proper current address (my address is included on my passport), unchanged for each of my 44 years of residence and routine payment by me of exhorbiant local and fraudulent real estate and other taxes within the county of Summit, but the Passport was not a driver's license, she said: Only, repeat, ONLY a driver's license is acceptable, she claimed, even though one does not have to have a license to drive as preresquite to vote, and one does not need a street address as preresquite to vote. TOTAL FRAUD WAS AT WORK AT THE POLL BOOTH - AGAIN, CONTINUING, IN REPUBLICAN PARTY POLITICS IN OHIO IN GENERAL, IN BATH TOWNSHIP, SUMMIT COUNTY OHIO, IN PARTICULAR.

Instructions on the ballot I was not permitted to complete disallowed one the right to vote for any "write-in" candidate even though the ballot document said when voting for a 'write-in" one needed only to shade-in the entire oblong circle next to to the blank line next to a solid line on the ballot; however, NO circle was on the ballot, and NO blank line was next to a non-existent solid line. When I complained to the poll booth "official" in charge she told me NO ONE IS PERMITTED TO VOTE FOR "WRITE-IN" CANDIDATES FOR POTUS. FRAUD! PURE, COMPLETE UNADULTERATED FRAUD, OF COURSE - AGAIN IN OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY BEHAVIOR. (In fairness to the poll worker "official" she gave me an orange colored post card saying I could write my complaint on the card and/or telephone the Board of Elections during business hours for relief, thereby adding significantly to the fraud, deceit, deception and dishonesty of the entire primary election process in Bath, Ohio this year).

John Kasich, Governor, State of Ohio, and Candidate for POTUS attempted to vote today at Rocky River, Ohio but was unable to do so unassisted as he seemingly was unfamilar and/or unable to use the digital equimpent necessary to vote. A person rushed to Kasich's assistance, most likely a government employee, most likely on the Ohio public payroll, most likely another Ohio person working to assist a politician and/or political party to succeed, and in total additional violation(s) of The Hatch Act (1939). The person, no person, is permitted to enter the booth and/or assist in coaching anyone concerning how and for whom to vote. NO ONE IS ELIGIBLE TO ASSIST ANYONE in the process of voting. For how many additional other persons, if any, did the person assisting Governor Kasich's vote. I asked for assistance similar to what Kasich received, but I was denied, even though the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States allows me, a registered Candidate for POTUS on the Republican primary, "equal protectin under the law" (14th Amendment).

What to do about this distortion of justice and violation of my 14th Amendment is the question, especially when NO private citizen has ANY authority to pursue criminal action against known criminals, and honorable public "officials" refuse to help, remembering, of course, many public officials are the precise "criminals" from whom we need protection and to whom we have erroneously entrusted our public affairs. There is no remedy at law; thus, where and to whom do we go for assistance? Worse yet, what becomes of the country when criminals running government are above the law and there is no place to go for citizens to find relief?

__________________

Written and Posted March 12, 2016

I am Thomas Joseph Coyne, and “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all;” also, I am a candidate for the office of President of the United States of America (POTUS).

A “Republic” is a group of people working freely and equally for the same cause.  The cause:  liberty, freedom to act in a manner of one’s choosing, a condition of not being subject to control or restriction, a state of not being controlled by government.  A Republic is a constitutional form of government, not a monarchy, not a dictatorship.  Government is controlled by the people; we the people are not controlled by government, the Constitution rules government, government does not rule the Constitution.  Each citizen in a Republic is free from government other than those controls deemed necessary by citizens to gain and maintain civility and reasonableness in management of group affairs.   What controls does a citizen have over government in the USA? 

“Justice,” a sufficient and necessary condition for all citizens, speaks to the issue of moral rightness, of equity, of fairness.  Justice is honorable, legal manipulations of verbiage is dishonorable.  ‘What your definition of is, is’ as claimed by a noticeably less than honorable person is unjust!  God demands justice; malevolent lawyers, judges and ill-tempered lobbyists along with life-long professional insider politicians demand adherence to legal definitions. It is unjust but legal to fill our prisons (overcapacity) with people guilty of questionable legal definitions?  Persons incarcerated currently have not always been subjected to God-driven “just” considerations. 

No force on earth is capable of dividing us as a nation if we adhere to our pledge, our solemn oath made before God, family and one another, a pledge to be fair and just with one another.  A Coyne-operated White House shall install a system of justice for all, but only if I am able to get onto the ballot.    

Each person on stage for so-called political ‘debates’ in South Carolina made a solemn pledge to support decisions for President made by the “Chair” and National Committee of his/her Political Party, a pledge requiring surrender of principle and one super ceding the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States.  Each ‘on stage’ candidate paid a required $40,000.00 to the Political Party who immediately upon receipt of the money kicked-back $20,000.00 (a bribe) to government employees of South Carolina, in violation of The Hatch Act (1939), and violation Amendments 1, 14, and 24 of our Constitution, and with no regard and/or respect whatsoever for USA citizens, for God, or for country.

In conspiracy, not-for-profit (tax) private Republican Party corporation(s) and S.C. government worked together to assure that no candidate refusing to sign a notarized pledge of allegiance, and pay a bribe of $40,000, ($20,000 to be kicked-back), would have his name on the ballot, or be permitted to debate.  Coyne refused! S. C. and Republican Party unjustly, unconstitutionally (A) denied placement of Coyne's name on the ballot, and (B) denied Coyne's solution presentations in debate.  Result: An unjust and totally "rigged" Primary Election in S.C. in 2016. Other states within the USA violate our Constitution in like manner!
 
To whom and to what do you pledge allegiance?

____________________   

____________________

Written and mailed 3/4/2016; posted 3/7/2016

March 4, 2016

Office of Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
11th Street, NE
Washington, D. C. 20543

Re:  EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RELIEF

CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Dear Ms. Rhatt, Case Manager, and others:

Please accept this letter as my “Application for Individual Immediate Relief filed subsequent to telephone conversation this date with Ms. Rhatt  and caused by dereliction of duty by U. S. District Court of South Carolina, Civil Action 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH: failure to issue a court order in response to December 21, 2015, Plaintiff “Motion for  Summary Judgment.”  (Suit has been pending against co-defendants Republican Party of South Carolina and Secretary of State of South Carolina since September 15, 2015: “Injunction, Emergency/Expedited Motion.” Ms. Rhatt was highly professional and very helpful)!

The Office of Attorney General of the U.S., Department of Justice, 10th and Constitution, NW, Washington, D.C., is  and since September 15, 2015 has been fully cognizant of this situation.  Please see DOJ Criminal Complaint File ID # 311916 which includes, not limited to, hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes and other financial kick-backs by the Republican Party to individuals in South Carolina, and otherwise, in exchange for government employee participation in our national election for POTUS, in violation of The Hatch Act (1939) and, more importantly, perhaps, serious violations of Amendments 1, 14 and 24 of the U.S. Constitution. 

The next Republican Party Primary Debate shall be held in Miami on March 10, 2016.  To succeed I must be cited on the ballot in Florida, and be included among participants in the ‘debate;’ additionally, I need and have earned the right to be included on the ballot in each state in the USA for POTUS.  Your immediate help is needed.

Most Respectfully,

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for the Office of President of the United States

c. Chambers of Justice Clarence Thomas.  Dear Sir:  I am in great health and will not die in my sleep.  I pray you are well also!  You were kind enough to write to me on 2/18/2000, 9/18/2001, 1/22/2003, and 2007.  Our country badly NEEDS your help now in favorable response, TODAY.   

____________________

Written February 24, 2016 and posted February 25, 2016

February 24, 2016

Attorney General of the United States of America
(Attn:  Criminal Complaint File # 3111916)
Department of Justice, Room 5111
10th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, D. C.  20530-0001

CERTIFIED MAIL – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Re:  United States District Court, District of South Carolina - Civil Action 3:15-cv-3669, JFA-SVH; also, DOJ Criminal Complaint File ID # 311916.

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

I write today seeking again your assistance with respect to criminal dereliction of duty by United States District Court Judge(s), District of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina (The Court), and criminal behavior on the part of:  (1) the State of South Carolina and (2) the Republican Party of South Carolina.  Your help is needed now; election results from the 2016 Republican Party South Carolina Primary must be set aside until you resolve this issue.

Federal District Court judges are appointed.  In return for the privilege of their appointment citizens require a solemn, sworn oath of office from each appointee - to protect, defend and support the Constitution of the United States.  When any judge violates his/her oath of office, as done in this case, no remedy is available to any Plaintiff or any Defendant; worse yet, in this case, illegal, delays by District Court in responding to Plaintiff is criminal.  Intentional Court delays/refusal despite repeated request, to issue an Award and/or Court Order contributed intentionally, significantly and successfully to Defendant successful efforts to manipulate national elections in South Carolina for POTUS, in the 2016 Primary while doing serious financial and other irreparable damage to Plaintiff; for example, considering the financial side only for a moment, the job of POTUS pays $400,000.00 per year plus perks, or $1,600,000.00 during one term in office.  I am willing to serve no more than one term.  Plaintiff had and remains with a very good chance of winning that job but to date has been denied access to the ballot in violation of Plaintiff’s Constitutional rights, most notably, (1) the First Amendment (freedom of speech), (2) the 14th Amendment (equal protection rights, and poll taxes), and (3) the 24th Amendment (poll tax or other tax prohibitions).

I asked you by hand written memo on January 14, 2016, on your copy of “Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment” dated December 21, 2015 to let me know the status of criminal complaint file No.3111916 which concerns itself with this problem, a request to which you have failed to respond. 

No non-government Plaintiff has standing in criminal court, and state and local police departments claim jurisdictional restraints prohibit corrective action by any of them; thus, what is one to do?  What am I to do?  Without intervention by you, the Department of Justice, and in time to allow Plaintiff, me, Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D. Financial Economist, an opportunity to earn the vote of the public for the office of POTUS, the DOJ has failed Plaintiff, and through no fault of Plaintiff, and the DOJ has failed the electorate of this once great nation!

District Court in South Carolina failed to act upon “Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment” filed December 21, 2015.  Court failure to respond assisted Defendants, South Carolina Secretary of State (SOS) which ignored the law suit totally, beyond the sixty-days (60) required by Civil Rules of Procedure # 12.  Plaintiff complaint was filed and hand-delivered by me in Columbia, S. C. on September 15, 2015.  SOS intentionally ignored my September 15, 2015 “Injunction, Emergency/Expedited Motion,” but RPSC made an appearance and filed a response.    

The South Carolina Republican Party (RPSC) response agreed with Plaintiff by explaining that one-half of the required by state of S.C. $40,000.00 would be kicked-back to S. C. government for use in managing the polls (poll tax or other tax) and much (all?) of the balance would be used to assist insider chosen candidates for POTUS during the primary election, in violation of the Hatch Act - salaried government employees helping/participating in a political election.  This written and openly admitted conspiracy admitting financial bribes between SOS and RPSC, with assistance through delay by District Court of South Carolina, has resulted in Plaintiff being excluded from the South Carolina Primary Election for President of the United States of America (POTUS).  It caused additionally Plaintiff exclusion from Republican Party debates.  These criminal and civil actions demonstrate serious, gross abuse of power and position by all three parties(s) while simultaneously violating the “equal treatment under the law” provision of the 14th amendment, and the Amendment 24 prohibiting a poll tax “or other tax.”  Personally, I fought long and hard to protect our Constitution, as did many other combat veterans.  These intentional delays and governmental abuse are criminal as well as civil and your intervention is necessary.    
                                   
Routinely, I have sent you copies of my legal action against the Republican Party of South Carolina and the state of South Carolina, Office of the Secretary of State, beginning with my initial “Injunction, Emergency/Expedited Motion,” written on September 10, 2015 and filed by me in person on September 15, 2015.  I have received one telephone response from your office letting me know the Criminal File number and explaining someone was studying the matter and would get back to me shortly.  Please define “shortly” and act accordingly.

Some, not all, criminal activities include:

  1. In violation of the Hatch Act (1939) the state of SC requires as pre-condition to having my name placed on the primary ballot for POTUS a signed and notarized pledge from me to support verbally and otherwise whatever decisions are made by the Republican Party leadership, a requirement that requires me to surrender my First Amendment rights (freedom of speech), accompanied by my cash or cashier’s check, in the amount of S40,000.00, made payable to the Republican Party of South Carolina, one-half of which, $20,000.00, by contract between RPSC and SOS, is kicked-back by RPSC to state of South Carolina employees for use in staffing and otherwise running the polls at election (a poll tax) time, and for other non-defined but allegedly worthwhile activities in need of cash by unnamed persons within the state of S.C.  An undetermined amount of this $20,000.00 per candidate, money goes to support, directly and financially persons (Senator Lindsay Graham?) with whom I must compete if I am to win the office of POTUS (extortion and fraud).  The $20,000.0 retained by RPSC of the $40,000.00 collected for it by SOS demands of the candidate is spent by RPSC in the same undisclosed manner as the SOS spending of its $20,000.00.  It is illegal for any state government to demand a $40,000.00 cash contribution be made to a tax-exempt (not-for-profit) corporation, a private and highly profitable 501-c-3 corporation (ALL tax exempt organizations earn a profit or go out of business), as pre-condition to performing state mandated services available to the public at large, and then accept a $20,000.00 bribe for doing so!

 

  1. The Republican Party of South Carolina, a non-profit (non-tax) corporation pays a $20,000.00 bribe to unnamed State of South Carolina persons allegedly for providing polling stations for the S.C. primary election (a poll tax in violation of Articles 14 and 24), and for serving as a collection agency for the Republican Party, but no state government or government employee may legally work and/or receive financial payment for that work on behalf of a political party or person running for election (The Hatch Act, 1939; 5 USC 7323 and 7324 ).  SOS conspired successfully with RPSC to violate the Hatch Act.  Doing so is a criminal as well as civil violation.  In this case it is and has been damaging financially and otherwise to Plaintiff.  Bribes and other criminal violations occur when a private corporation, RPSC gives money to a governmental unit, SOS, to assist RPSC with any election, primary or otherwise.
  1. Other Hatch Act violations include misuse of government employee’s involvement with political activity assisting in getting someone elected to POTUS, to include   publicity photos designed to help a particular candidate or political party.  At times, 2,000 or more public employees on government payroll and during working hours and while being paid by taxpayers may appear in a picture of an event screaming loudly and wildly of how they want a Governor Kasich, or similar government employee, to be POTUS.  Such an event, if it occurred, would be easy to confirm if one had authority to investigate.  A private citizen has no such authority although Amendment 14 provides non-government insiders equal protection under the law.  Governors and U. S. Senators seeking what each considers a better job would have no difficulty obtaining information concerning Hatch Act violators and violations.  Highly probable and provable with an investigation is plenty of evidence of government employee engagement in political activity in violation of The Hatch Act:  misuse of government cell phone, misuse of government equipment, computers, perhaps, misuse of government leased vehicles, misuse of government owned vehicles, misuse of government travel cards, misuse of official government credentials to gain information not available to non-insiders, noncompliance with the law, noncompliance with administrative programs and policies, and more, is easily obtainable if  a private citizen had rights to investigate crimes, rights reserved to government by government.  I must rely at this time upon DOJ for investigation into these crimes. And I hereby make that request of DOJ.  Many veterans have fought and died to protect the 14th, 24th and lst Amendments!  Without protection of the District Court and without protection of the DOJ they died in vain.

No state or federal government or governmental unit has any legal or Constitutional right to demand surrender by me of my freedom of speech for any reason; most certainly not as a Candidate for POTUS and, state governments are required by law to conduct national elections for POTUS without demanding poll taxes from candidates (extortion).  Required services conducted by none of our fifty states may look legally to non-establishment candidates unwilling to pay exorbitant and extortive taxes.

  1.  Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO) violations by the score exist within SOS and RPSC.  Plaintiff has been damaged badly by their exploitive, fraudulent and financial conspiracy.  It appears, financial and other illegal activities are “status quo” for these parties, and as I understand the situation triple financial damages are in order for each RICO violation.  Please advise as I am unclear concerning financial damages, none of which I wanted initially.  I wanted, and expected only fairness from my federal District Courts, dignity, discipline, and integrity, as well, of course, but our cultural decline disallows such things these days it seems; also, I expected to find placement of my name on the primary ballot a simple step in an honest democratic election.  You can help and I intend now to use whatever financial damages I receive to help finance my campaign.  The balance, if any, shall be given to a charity of my choosing.

 

  1. Manipulation of time requirements with which one must comply in order to have his/her name on the ballot exist in South Carolina, requirements agreed upon (conspiracy) by SOS and RPSC.  Manipulations of dates available were significantly shortened to exclude any person (Plaintiff) considered non-controllable as I refused to sign the pledge of allegiance to RPSC.  These manipulations are criminal.  (As with other matters of substance in this letter, date manipulations for example, I have neither the time nor talent to cite with specificity the legal code being violated in each case.  Importantly, I lack authority to demand and obtain subpoenas of the criminals involved.  A private citizen has no rights to pursue criminal cases.  I assume the gathering of such information might be a part of your job?). 
  1. Republican Party South Carolina has on its web page the number 1 item of its platform:  “strict adherence to the Constitution of the United States"; RPSC says the  number 1 demand of all persons brash enough to want his/her name on the ballot is that the person must surrender his/her first Amendment rights.  Anyone signing must NOT feel free speak against any decision RPSC decides upon.  This pledge of allegiance to the Party is made before anyone, not even Party Leadership, knows what decision is to be made.  This RPSC requirement is fraudulent as well as unethical.  Fraud exists as it allows Party to collect huge quantities of money under a knowingly false statement, and RPSC does so over and again verbally and in writing circulated world-wide.

 

  1. By controlling who is permitted by government to run for office government controls who can get elected which is another violation of Amendment 14, equal protection under the law, ratified by Congress in 1868.

Conspiracy exists in fact, not in theory, between the government of South Carolina, and the Republican Party of South Carolina.  It is not confined to illegal bribes and fee-splitting.  The 2016 primary Republican election was “rigged” totally.  Both parties gained and maintain huge financial and non-financial advantages because of it.  RICO exists in spades! 

The purpose of this letter is three-fold:

  1. Have the DOJ interject itself into this case in a timely enough manner to assure Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D., financial economist, is allowed his Constitutional right to compete for POTUS, thereby allowing citizens throughout the country the opportunity to vote for a competent non-insider.  One term only is what I am willing to do; and,

 

  1. Election results from the 2016 Republican Party South Carolina primary must be set aside until you resolve this issue.  The Republican Primary in South Carolina was “rigged.”
  1. Have the DOJ interject itself into this case deeply enough to provide justice, instead of allowing injustice to prevail and thereby contribute to additional illegal manipulations by persons too big to fail (Governors, U. S. Senators, Billionaires).  DOJ must demand dignity, discipline, ethical behavior, honesty, honor, integrity, and, above all else, truthfulness, minimum standards of excellence necessary for a nation, its leaders, and its citizenry to foster and support if greatness is to be gained and maintained.

 

Thank you!

With respect,

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph. D.,
(Financial Economist)
(Candidate for POTUS)
c.

  1. South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street, Suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  2. South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina, 29201;
  3. United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite # 500, Columbia, South Carolina, 29201;
  4. Bowers Law Office, Post Office, Box 5054, Columbia, South Carolina 29250
  5. United States District Court, District of South Carolina, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 20201;
  6. (Other(s). 

____________________

Written and Posted December 26, 2015

HOW ISIS FINANCES WORLD WAR III ©

World war III has begun, the USA is losing, our Muslim Imposter President, Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro, born August 4, 1961 in the British Protectorate of Kenya remains gleeful while reading from his teleprompter:  “you ain’t seen nuttin yet.”

The enemy is ISIS.  Socialists preach it is politically incorrect to say so.  A prominent national figure has assured us Obama was born in Hawaii, a statement Obama denies.  The same man claims he studied (unlikely) the birth certificate before announcing Obama is a native born Hawaiian (blatantly untrue).     

The “Keep Your Hands off My Body Crowd” unwittingly, hopefully, is in full financial support of Muslim Extremists, ISIS.  This ‘hands off’ group includes the financially splendid and untouchable not-for-tax Planned Parenthood people who teach how to harvest body parts and sell them on the open market.  Two eyes, two kidneys, two lungs, one heart (no soul) plus other so-called “fetal tissue” are sold.  Each part “earns” tens of millions of dollars domestically (USA), plus larger quantities of money internationally.  Tax free Planned Parenthood sells everything saleable in the body of the murdered unborn child in a manner similar to the way butchers sell (harvest) every part of a pig, even the head, eye balls, intestines, and so on.  Planned Parenthood knows the names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses of buyers of these body parts and stands ready to sell that list to persons willing to buy, to ISIS for example.  By this route ISIS makes money with which to buy equipment and ammunition for its war(s) with profits from the sale of body parts!  Existing ISIS tanks, trucks and so on were abandoned by Americans on the battlefield in Iraq and Kuwait and Afghanistan and Pakistan, and "found" by ISIS but it needs new equipment now.   

Planned Parenthood charges females to kill their unborn children while ISIS gets its body parts to sell by kidnapping young people, keeping them alive long enough to assure only healthy, profitable body parts are sold to physicians/surgeons and groups on the open market. ISIS removes parts from a live breathing body which kills the donor.  While alive in captivity the young boy or girl is raped whenever and wherever the Muslim extremist feels the need.

If caught, the Muslim extremist explains to courts s/he is only practicing his/her religion.  The Muslim “Imam” declares rape and murder a part of Muslim religion provided it is done to further the Muslim cause.  U. S. Supreme Court rulings become helpful as government may not interfere with the practice of one’s religion.  As with planes used to ruin World Trade Center lives and buildings, a Muslim “Imam” uses our Constitution to justify the rape and killing of our children and the sale in pieces of their innocent young bodies.  These “peaceful” religious figures need now to speak now to someone who understands finance.  THINK FINANCE!

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
Candidate for the Office of President of
The United States of America

___________________

Posted December 22, 2015; written December 21, 2015

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Civil Action 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH
Magistrate Judge Hodges

PLAINTIFF
Thomas Joseph Coyne
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333-2810

Versus

DEFENDANTS
South Carolina Secretary of State (SOS)
Office of Mark Hammond
1205 Pendelton Street, Suite 525
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

And

South Carolina Republican Party (RPSC)
Office of Nat Moore
1913 Marion Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
____________________

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

            Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D., moves the court for Summary Judgment with regards to fifteen demands contained in the “Injunction, Emergency/Expedited Motion;” most especially, paragraphs 14 and 15 of that motion, written September 10, 2015, filed and hand-delivered personally in Columbia, South Carolina on September 15, 2015. 

Summary judgment for Plaintiff is Appropriate.  Plaintiff has no Adequate Remedy at Law; moreover, (1) Defendant SOS made no appearance and answered NONE of Plaintiff’s complaints within the 60 day time limit demanded by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and SOS made no legal defense during the same 60 day time period, and (2) Defendant RPSC, as demonstrated by documents filed with the Court, agrees with Plaintiff’s assertions concerning SOS and RPSC violations of Plaintiff’s 1st, 14th and 24th Amendments, and with violations of the federal Hatch Act through financial kick-backs of substantial sums of money (tens of thousands of dollars per person) from Plaintiff or anyone brash enough to attempt to get his/her name on the primary ballot in South Carolina.  Attempts by SOS and RPSC to extort money from Plaintiff, serious amounts of cash flow to be shared 50/50 between SOS and RPSC, is criminal as well as civil and Plaintiff should not be denied his Constitutional right to have his name on the primary ballot because Plaintiff, by age, education, and heavy business and academic experience, caught this travesty and gross violation of power and authority in S. C. public office by S. C. public officials.  Additionally, citizens of South Carolina should not be denied the right to vote in primary election for a competent non-establishment person, Plaintiff, instead of a person hand-picked for the office of President (POTUS) by life-long, professional politicians.

Plaintiff respectfully moves that the Court rule in Plaintiff’s favor on all Causes of Action cited in Plaintiff Documents before the Court on the 9/10 or 9/15/2015 date, and later, since a decision by the Court in Plaintiff’s favor based only on the extortion Complaint, and/or the Hatch Act Complaint, and/or the Poll tax Complaint, and/or the splitting of fees (taxes) Complaint would likely result in the SOS and/or the RPSC reinstating these criminal and civil improper procedures and activities at a later date thus requiring a whole new case to address these issues. 

Failure, and/or Refusal, and/or continued Prolonged Delay in granting this “Plaintiff Motion for Summary Judgment” results in a totally “rigged” primary election for the office of President of the United States of America in the State of South Carolina in the 2016 national elections, in addition to denying Plaintiff his Constitutional rights!

The Court is asked to assure the name of Thomas Joseph Coyne, financial economist, appears on the primary ballot in time enough to allow Plaintiff an equal opportunity to earn the office of POTUS.

Thank you!

WRITTEN THIS 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER,
2015 IN BATH, OHIO, USA, AND
Respectfully submitted,

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
Attorney for Self
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333
(330) 836-0563
(330) 957-7962
____________________

I affirm the Federal District Court for the District of South Carolina (The Court) plus each Defendant name is receiving a copy of “Plaintiff Motion for Summary Judgment” against the Secretary of State, Columbia, South Carolina and the Republican Party South Carolina, as well as other persons, each by U. S. Postal System, as follows:

  1. South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street, Suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  2. South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  3. Attorney General of the United States of America, Department of Justice, Room 5111, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 20530-0001, (Attn: Criminal Complaint File ID # 3111916, Constitutional Amendment violations, Hatch Act violations, poll taxes in the many thousands of dollars resulting in fee (tax) splitting between SOS employees and other government persons and RPSC, et al);
  4. United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite # 500, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  5. Bowers Law Office, Post Office box 5054.  (I affirm as well my telephone efforts (plural) to Bowers in an effort to reach out of court settlement with its client, Republican Party of South Carolina, but to no avail;
  6. Other(s).

 

Respectfully,

Thomas Joseph Coyne
December 21, 2015
(Bath, Ohio 44333) 

____________________

Posted December 9, 2015

GOALS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CANDIDATE THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE IS COMMMITED TO ACHIEVE

  1. ABORTION:  No federal money shall be spent for abortions
  2. AGENCIES:  Agencies having outlived their usefulness to taxpayers shall be abolished.  NO Agency shall have authority to tax (mandate);
  3. AMENDMENT(S):  The Constitution of the United States of America shall be amended as follows:  (A) “No government or governmental unit shall impose a tax of any sort on the primary residential property of any citizen in the USA;" (B) "There shall be no taxation without representation;" (C) "The term in elected public office shall not exceed a total of twelve years (2 terms) for a U. S. Senator, and the term in elected public office shall not exceed a total of twelve years (6 terms) for a U. S. House of Represemtative member;" and, (D) "No vote of the people is valid if it consists of less than fifty percent of those persons eligible to vote." It is better to leave an office(s) vacant rather than have it occupied by someone unacceptable to the majority of eligible voters.
  4. AMERICAN ENGLISH:  To get along better with one another we must speak the same language. Congress will declare American English the official language in which all government business is conducted;
  5. BANKING STRUCTURE: The Glass-Steagall Act (1934), GSA, gave the USA and financial markets, and therefore employment, output and income increase opportunities throughout the world, stability for approximately seventy-two (72) years. The Graham-Leach-Bliley Act, GLBA, November, 1999, cancelled competition bewtween financial intermediaries when it cancelled Glass-Steagall. GLBA IS THE CAUSAL FACTOR ASSOCIATED WITH CURRENT JOB LOSSES AND FNANCIAL CHAOS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD (Greece and elsewhere). President Coyne will rescind GLBA and reinstate GSA.
  6. BORDERS:  Our borders shall be secured;
  7. COLLEGE STUDENTS: Current fraudulent government policies overcharge students through exhorbiant tuition fees and then lends them money to be repaid latter, knowing students cannot repay the money. This government sham shall be corrected - quickly;
  8. COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF:  NO person touted as potential POTUS to date is competent to serve as Commander-in-Chief. None of them will be elected as POTUS!
  9. EDUCATION:  “Common Core” shall be abolished. Other educatiional changes will occur with some schools being merged and/or denied (closed) government funding. New Medical and Dental Schools will be created.
  10. EMPLOYMENT, OUTPUT AND INCOME:  Citizens of the USA shall be given first consideration/priority in new job creation;
  11. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: Banking is the most important industry in every economy, capitalist, socialist and/or communist. The FED will work again to assure (A) full employment and (B) price stability;
  12. FISCAL POLICY: Government balanced budgets are necessary for a strong and growing nation. Governmental budgets shall be balanced!
  13. DESALINATION:  Congress will be asked to finance research necessary to economically desalinate (no Salt) ocean water;
  14. FOREIGN POLICY AND TRADE:   Foreign policy, to include all trade and treaty obligations, shall be addressed and handled properly. The Iranian assault on America, to include destruction of our Embassy (1979) will be handled.
  15. GOD: There is ONLY ONE God. He is, has been, and shall remain a mystery to all of us. The Christian God; the Jewish God; the Muslim God, and the God of Buddha, Hindu and of lessor known religions to Americans exists. Each religion has devoted followers with each having a legitimate right to worship God as s/he sees fit provided worship is peaceful and does not interefere with Constitutional rights of other persons, each of whom is free to worship, or not to worship, as s/he sees fit. Let us not fight over which religious interpretation of God's goodness and light is best, more correct, more sacred as though we were fourth grade school boys shouting at one another in the playground, arguing over whether "my dad can beat-up your dad.” One other God-related point concerns currrent socialist-created hysteria regarding ongoing changes in the climate. Since God created the universe the climate on planet earth has been changing, getting warmer at times and getting colder at times, but existing at all times. No legitimate relationship exists between alleged "global warming" as described by current self-serving, revenue seeking life-long professional politicians and seasonal, cyclical or long-term trends in temperature(s) and fossil fuels. We have not yet learned how to control the weather regardless of how much tax socialists want Americans to pay. President Coyne plans to spend his time and effort on matters we humans can change.
  16. IMMIGRATION:  Illegal immigration shall be discontinued;
  17. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND: The IMF was created in 1946 by John Maynard Keynes, Brenton Woods, New Hampshire, and has fallen into the leadership hands of the wrong people. The IMF will be restored to its intended use;
  18. ISIS: Relatively recent USA commander's-in-chief (Bush II and Obama) have been required by lack of military experience/competence to rely upon advice from elected and appointed politicians and lobbyists to find the road to war in Kuwait, Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Bush II needed Colin Powell and his presentation at the UN, for example. Each of these American Presidents sent highly competent, well-armed and equiped members of the U. S. military marching in harm's way on the road to war, only to order their withdrawal soon thereafter, leaving behind American armaments (tanks, trucks, jeeps, ground to air missiles, rifles and similar weapons, and plenty of ammunition and cash ($100 bills by the 2 1/2 ton truckload)). ISIS is happy to use our supplies now in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere. Currently touted persons desiring to be POTUS will find the road to war in Syria easy: S/he quite simply will use the same Bush/Obama"advisors" to send and to withdraw more troops and to abandon additional modern military equipment and cash for more Muslim extremists to find, unless we avoid this dilemma by electing a competent president: One with integrity and a mind of his own, a combat veteran, one having the moral compass necessary for us to win at war and safely find our way home. Republican Party and Democrat Party policies, inundated with political and military advisers of questionable quality and judgment, plus entrenched, well-established "insider" elected politicians and lobbyists, have resulted in giving temporary success to a well-armed and equipped ISIS. President Coyne can and will handle this treason properly!
  19. JUSTICE:  The Department of Justice shall be revised so as to assure “liberty and justice for all.”  Currently DOJ is only a legal department;
  20. MARGINAL EFFICIENCY OF CAPITAL: The MEC determines the level of increases in employment, output and income. The interest rate does not determine the level of new capital investment! Investment in new plant and equipment is NOT a function of the interest rate. It does not matter what the interest rate is. MEC matters! Business will borrow and invest at an interest rate of 10% or 20% provided, and ONLY provided, business can earn more than 10% or 20% on the borrowed money, for example. ALL talk of the Fed and its interest rate policy is nonsense except for the impact the interest rate has on financial investments (i.e., stock and bond markets), and then interest rate levels matter. The USA has never had and does not want an economy characterized by existence of an overpriced stock market instead of an economy that pays well while creating jobs for current day Americans, our children and grandchildren? President Coyne will work for new, better real job creation through legitimate investment in plant and equipment to the benefit of ALL American citizens while simultaneously protecting proper stock and bond markets;
  21. MEDICAL/DENTAL CARE:  Obama Care shall be abolished and replaced with an alternative and properly financed medical and dental plan;
  22. MILITARY:  Each governor will be asked to organize an all-volunteer, well disciplined and well equipped Militia;
  23. MONETARY POLICY: The money supply is critical to success in any meaningful effort to increase employment, output and income. Currently the USA has too much money (coin and currency and demand deposits (checking accounts)) in circulation. The quality of a nation's money supply is affected, adversely or otherwise, by the quantity of money in circulation. President Coyne plans on having a strong, high quality dollar during his four (4) years in the White House;
  24. NASA:  The National Aeronautic and Space Administration shall be reorganized and properly financed;
  25. OIL: The Keystone Pipeline project from Canada will be completed promptly and with complete environmental protection;
  26. SECOND AMENDMENT:  All amendments to the U. S. Constitution shall be protected with major emphasis on the Second Amendment: the RIGHT (and responsibility) to bear arms. Freedom is not free;
  27. SOCIAL SECURITY:  The Social Security Act shall be amended. ALL senior citizens shall be secure in the knowledge that entitlements are guaranteed, and shall be paid in full and on time;
  28. TAXATION:  The Internal Revenue Code shall be amended resulting in a 7% tax rate on all income with no exceptions, exemptions and/or deductions.  We all play, we all pay;
  29. UNITED NATIONS: The UN is a failed organization. The League of Nations failed after World War I and the United Nations failed after World War II, and failed for identical reasons. (Several UN activities are worthwhile and will be retained once funded and managed properly); 
  30. VETERAN AFFAIRS: Almost immediately after taking office the matter of proper treatment for veterans shall be addressed, and resolved;
  31. WORLD BANK: As with the IMF the World Bank was created in 1946 in Brenton Woods, New Hampshire by John Maynard Keynes. As with the IMF, World Bank will be restored to useful purpose;
  32. WORLD WAR III.  World war III has begun.  We are losing.  The names and personages of current enemies have changed since World Wars I and II, but the socialist mission which began in earnest with President Woodrow Wilson (World War I) remains unchanged:  CONTROL OVER EVERYONE AND EVERTHING THAT MOVES. Hitler wanted national socialist power with no identifiable national borders.  Hitler wanted to walk in and take control everywhere. Hitler's “National Socialism” (NAZI) lost the battles, but won the war. All of Europe is socialist currently and their minions are coming hard and fast for the USA.  USA enemies are here already. At this time and place the USA cannot, repeat, cannot rely upon on-the-job-training of a commander-in-chief who is too young and/or has no military experience and/or meaningful military background. By age, education, background, and military experience, and of persons cited to date, Thomas Joseph Coyne is the only candidate qualified/capable to serve as commander-in-chief;
  33. THINK FINANCE! Stand with Tom Coyne. Make the White House "Coyne Operated."

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.

(Financial Economist)

Candidate for the Office
Of President of the
United States of America

www.coyne-assoc.com
____________________

Written December 6, 2015; Posted December 7, 2015 (A Day of Infamy) 

 

RESPONSE to DEFENDANT MOTION to DISMISS
In the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
For the DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Civil Action 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH

 

PLAINTIFF,
Thomas Joseph Coyne
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333-28810

Versus
 
DEFENDANTS,
South Carolina Secretary of State (SOS)
Office of Mark Hammond
1205 Pendelton Street, suite 525
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

And

South Carolina Republican Party (RPSC)
Office of Nat Moore
1913 Marion Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

____________________

EXPLANATION OF THE FACTS

  1. Defendant SOS filed a Motion to “Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim” demanding a response by 12/7/2015.  Defendant SOS was granted the privilege of filing its Motion via an “electronic filing” system, a system denied to Plaintiff verbally and in writing even though Amendment 14 of the U.S. Constitution guarantees any Candidate attempting to get his/her name on the primary ballot for the Office of President of the United States of America, Plaintiff, “equal protection of the laws.”  Plaintiff has been denied equal treatment of the laws.  Plaintiff has been told by THE COURT, verbally and in writing and by court order, that he “will not be electronically” mailed to (sic).  This violation of Plaintiff’s Constitutional right is relevant because Plaintiff’s “MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT” WAS WRITTEN AND MAILED BY UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ON NOVEMBER 21, 2015 AND PRESUMABLY WAS NOT RECEIVED IN TIME FOR THE COURT TO KNOW NOT TO ISSUE ITS “ROSEBORO ORDER TO PLAINTIFF” VIA U. S. POSTAL SYSTEM, MAILED BY THE COURT FROM COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA ON NOVEMBER 24, 2015. 

 

  1. Plaintiff “Motion for Default Judgment” should have been given immediate attention; instead, Defendant “Motion to Dismiss” was given preferential treatment, complete with court “order” to Plaintiff to respond within “34 days from the date of this order” which was dated November 19, 2015 but mailed November 24, 2015.  This is an important fact as it places additional pressure on Plaintiff to respond to a Defendant who failed to answer any item of Plaintiff complaint.  Defendant did not, as required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, deny within sixty (60) days in accordance with Rule 12 each statement in Plaintiff complaint saying each charge was untrue or admitting each charge was true, or even so much as filing a “Notice of Appearance.” Most certainly, Defendant was in default, by definition, no later than Monday, November 15, 2015, but Plaintiff was denied equal right to file electronically on September 10, 2015, the date of writing of the complaint. 
  1. Defendant SOS had no legitimate legal standing and/or right to file anything with The Court subsequent to the November 10, 2015 date, or November 15, 2015, dependent upon how The Court views the electronic filing denial situation. 

 

  1.  For legal standing in a case Defendant MUST answer the complaint.  Defendant did not!  Defendant could have said, for example, insufficient information exists currently either to admit or deny a statement in Plaintiff complaint but, regardless, Defendant was required to respond to Plaintiff complaint and did not.  Remember:  any statement in Plaintiff complaint not specifically denied within 60 days must be admitted and acted upon as being truthful by The Court; additionally,
  1. Defendant was required by Rule 8(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to include in its answer any legal defenses it may have.  Rule 12 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure say Defendant may not, cannot, raise one or more legal defense after the lapse of sixty (60) days.  Defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss” violates Rule 12 (b).

 

Defendant devised its “Motion to Dismiss” to distract THE COURT and in violation of Rule 12 (b).  Defendant seeks to financially and otherwise damage further any chance Plaintiff has of getting his name on the ballot in time to win the primary election in South Carolina for POTUS.  The Defendant “Motion to Dismiss” is a particularly wicked thing to do when time is of the essence and Plaintiff has been attempting to receive “emergency/expedited” treatment of his complaint.  Defendant Motion to Dismiss is designed to delay judgment in favor of Plaintiff, but Defendant is legally unable to raise its issue this late in the case, more than 60 days have expired.

  1. RPSC response of 10/2/2015, “Statement of Facts” acknowledge as true SOS and RPSC violations charged in Plaintiff’s written complaint of 9/10/2015, hand-delivered to Columbia, S. C. on 9/15/2015.  RPSC’s filing provides ample support for issuance by The Court of Plaintiff’s “Motion for Default Judgment.”

 

  1. Plaintiff is damaged badly by being refused access to electronic filing, and may not now be invited to join other candidates in Las Vegas, Nevada for an upcoming debate scheduled currently for December 15, 2015.


Plaintiff Answer to SOS Defendant Motion to Dismiss

As explained above, no legitimate reason exists for Plaintiff being required to answer Defendant SOS’s “Motion to Dismiss;” however, THE COURT order shall be followed:

The illegal, unethical, and overly tardy SOS Defendant “Motion to Dismiss” may be fairly and properly summarized as follows: 

“The Office of the South Carolina Secretary of State is the administrative agency of the State of South Carolina.  It has many duties, but none of them involve oversight or authority over the conduct of elections in South Carolina.”  Complete, absolute end of story except for an SOS Defendant footnote:  “Plaintiff may be confusing this Defendant with the South Carolina State Elections Commission, established . . . “.

Plaintiff understands the ministerial duty of SOS is to commission selected governmental appointees by the Governor to positions of power and influence within the State of South Carolina.  Additionally, no person may serve on SCSEC until and unless SOS “commissions” that person. Plaintiff understands as well that ALL members (5) of SCSEC are government employees, appointed to four year terms each, who individually and collectively work hand-in-hand with the Republican Party of South Carolina (RPSC), co- defendant in this case, to promote the overall well-being of the Republican Party and they do so for money:  South Carolina government receives a 50% financial kick-back of $40,000.00 for each person attempting to have his/her name on the primary ballot for POTUS.  What part of that money, if any, ($20,000.00 per person) goes to the Secretary of State’s office?  If a correct answer is ‘none’ SOS could have said so in answer to Plaintiff complaint.  SOS said nothing.  Why? Does SCSEC as a governmental unit, or do the five (5) Commissioners governing SCSEC get that money OR DOES ALL OR PART OF IT GO TO SOS PERSONS WHO COMMISSION THEM?  What part of that $20,000 goes to existing elected and/or appointed SOS persons?  How is one to know?  SOS could have and should have answered Plaintiff complaints.  To stonewall as they did is unacceptable according to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12.

Working together, RPSC and SCSEC persons control who runs for office and who gets to vote for who runs for office.  This practice is a criminal as well as civil practice and in violation of the federal Hatch Act, of course, but in violation also of the 1st 14th and 24th Amendments as explained by Plaintiff earlier.       

Two other points:
(1) RPSC Defendant says, in part, November 16, 2015, “. . . It is clear the right to vote may not constitutionally be conditioned upon payment of a tax or fee.”  (Emphasis added).  If the $40,000 fee is not a poll tax what kind of “other tax” (Source:  Last two words, Section 1, Amendment 24), is it?

(2)  The small list of legal references cited by RPSC in its earlier electronic filing with THE COURT fails to acknowledge each case cited concerned itself with the poll tax only.  Plaintiff complaint concerns itself with much more:  (A) manipulation of deadline date for registering for placement of name on the primary ballot and, importantly, with (B) cash flow of the $40,000.00 and to whom it goes and why it goes there, (C) the required pledge of allegiance to the RPSC as precondition to getting one’s name on the ballot, (D) the required Notarization of my signature on my pledge of allegiance to RPSC, (E) financial kick-backs of significantly large sums of money, in the hundreds of thousands of dollars annually, between a private not-for-profit firm and one or more units of government, (F) the equal protection clause of Amendment 14, (G) government and RPSC financial other support in violation of the federal Hatch Act, (H) government requirement of a private person (Plaintiff) that $40,000 payment and a notarized pledge of allegiance must accompany one and at the same time and place to a private corporation (RPSC), (I) extortion of required amounts of money by RPSC and SOS for conducting an election they are required to conduct as precondition to placement of name on primary ballot, and (J) more.

AWARD/COURT ORDER

THE COURT must grant judgment in favor of Plaintiff complaint of September 10, 2015, plus whatever additional financial and non-financial relief is deemed appropriate by THE COURT.

 

Written this 6th Day of December,
2015 in Bath, Ohio 44333, USA

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.
(Financial Economist)
Attorney for Self
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333-2810
www.coyne-assoc.com
330-836-0563
330-957-7962

___________________

I affirm the Federal District Court for the District of South Carolina plus each Defendant named in this complaint is receiving a copy of this Response to Defendant Motion to Dismiss regarding Plaintiff Emergency/Expedited Motion of September 10, 2015, as well as other persons, each by U. S. Postal System, as follows:

  1. South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Steet, Suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  2. South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  3. Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice, Room 5111, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 29201, (ATTN:  Criminal Complaint file # 3112926, the 1st, 14th and 24th Constitutional Amendment violations, federal Hatch Act violations, poll tax and fee violations in the many thousands of dollars resulting in fee splitting between S. C. government employees and RPSC, et al);
  4. United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite 500, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  5. Bowers Law Office, Post Office Box 50549, Columbia, South Carolina 29250.  (I affirm as well my telephone efforts (plural) to Bowers in an effort to reach out of court settlement with its client, Republican Party of south Carolina, but to no avail);
  6. Other (s)

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne
December 6, 2015

____________________

Posted November 26, 2015

 

 

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Civil Action 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH
____________

Thomas Joseph Coyne
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333

Plaintiff,
Versus

South Carolina Secretary of State (SOS)
Office of Mark Hammond
1205 Pendelton Street, Suite 525
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

And

South Carolina Republican Party (RPSC)        Defendants
Office of Nat Moore
1913 Marion Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

____________

Two defendants (2) are charged by Plaintiff in this complaint of September 10, 2015 seeking emergency/expedited action by The Court.

(A) Defendant I.  South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Mark Hammond made no appearance.  SOS failed to respond to Plaintiff complaint subsequent to having been served.  Under Rule 8 (b) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, every Defendant must admit or deny each complaint made by Plaintiff; moreover, the United States government, its agencies, and employees have sixty (60) days to file an answer (Rule 12, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). SOS failed to respond to any item in Plaintiff complaint! Failure to file a legal defense in its answer makes SOS ineligible to raise a legal defense later, and (b) failure to file any answer, failure totally to respond, within the required period of time (60) days, combined with no legal defense places Defendant Secretary of State, Columbia, South Carolina in default.  Plaintiff hereby asks The Court to grant default judgment in favor of Plaintiff Thomas Joseph Coyne and against Defendant Secretary of State, Columbia, South Carolina.

(B) Defendant II.  Unlike SOS a “Notice of Appearance” was filed on behalf of South Carolina Republican Party  (RPSC) only while, as cited above, the other party, SOS, gave no notice of appearance, or similar.  However, RPSC after giving notice of appearance, failed to answer or otherwise legally defend its misbehavior; for example, to cite a few examples only:  Defendant RPSC (a) failed to respond to Plaintiff charges of manipulation of the deadline date for candidates and complaint concerning desire to have Plaintiff’s name on the Primary election ballot for President, USA, (POTUS) without Defendant RPSC demanding money from Plaintiff and telling Plaintiff some of that money (50%) would be paid, kicked-back, to SOS, (b) failed to respond to criminal and civil complaints concerning violations associated with who runs for office and who gets to vote for who runs for office, (c) failed to respond to Plaintiff complaint concerning demand of notarized pledges of allegiance to a political party, thus requiring Plaintiff to surrender Plaintiff’s freedom of speech, violating Plaintiff of Amendment I protection of the Constitution, and do this as pre-condition for placement of his name on the ballot for Primary election of POTUS, (d) failed to respond to complaint concerning payment(s) by a political party, a private corporation, of $20,000 per candidate to elected and appointed SOS persons as pre-condition for allowing anyone’s name to appear for POTUS on the Primary election ballot, (e) failed to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint concerning unequal treatment under the law, in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, (f) failed to respond to Plaintiff complaint concerning Article 24, poll tax “. . . or other tax” as cited boldly in Article 24, (g) failed to respond to Plaintiff complaint concerning numerous and continuous violations of the Hatch Act by appointed and elected government employees, (h) failed to respond to Plaintiff complaint calling attention to what amounts to conspiracy and extortion efforts by SOS and RPSC when Poll tax violations are tied to, associated with, Amendments 14 and 24 of the U.S. Constitution.  Plaintiff hereby asks The Court to grant default judgment in favor of Plaintiff Thomas Joseph Coyne and against Defendant Republican Party of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

Award/Action

Defendant, SOS (a) failed to answer, neither admitting or denying any allegations in Plaintiff complaint and therefore (b) failed to raise a legal defense in response any Plaintiff item cited.  Defendant RPSC answered Plaintiff complaint but failed in response to provide a legal defense.  Inasmuch as neither Defendant can raise new legal defense(s) after the lapse of sixty days (60), Defendant RPSC, likewise, is in default.  

This Court must grant judgment in favor of Plaintiff complaint, plus whatever additional financial and non-financial relief deemed appropriate by The Court.
Written this 21st day of November,
2015, Bath, Ohio 44333, USA and
Respectfully submitted

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.
Attorney for self,
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333
www.coyne-assoc.com
(330) 836-0563
(330) 957-7962
__________________

I affirm the Federal District Court for the District of South Carolina (The Court) plus each Defendant named in this complaint is receiving a copy of this Motion for Default Judgment against the Secretary of State, Columbia, South Carolina, as well as other persons, each by U. S. Postal System, as follows,:

  1. South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street, Suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  2. South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  3. Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice, Room 5111, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 29201, (Attn: criminal complaint file # ID 3112926, the 1st, 14th and 24th Constitutional Amendment violations, Hatch Act violations, poll taxes in the many thousands of dollars resulting in fee splitting between SOS employees and other government persons and RPSC, et al);
  4. United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite #500, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
  5. Bowers Law Office, Post Office Box 50549, Columbia, South Carolina 29250.  I affirm as well my telephone efforts (plural) to Bowers in an effort to reach out of court settlement with its client, Republican Party of South Carolina, but to no avail;
  6. Other(s).

___________________

Written and mailed (served) 11/10/2015; Posted 11/26/2015

INJUNCTION
EMERGENCY/EXPEDITED MOTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION

Thomas Joseph Coyne                                                 Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH
Plaintiff

            Versus

South Carolina Secretary of State (SOS)
And South Carolina Republican Party (RPSC)

Defendant(s)
______________________

ADDITIONAL REQUEST FOR SPEEDY HANDLING OF PLAINTIFF THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE’S EMERGENCY/EXPEDITED MOTION OF SEPTEMBER 10, 2015
______________________________

The Court was asked on September 10, and October 15, 2015 to officially issue, with dispatch, an order confirming that Constitutional rights of Plaintiff have been and are being violated by Defendant(s).  The Court knows Plaintiff is a Candidate for the Office of President of the United States of America and a timely Award is crucial if Plaintiff is to participate in national debates and other election opportunities.    

Articles 1, 14, and 24 of the Constitution of the United States dealing with (I) Freedom of Speech, Article 1, (the required Plaintiff pledge of allegiance to RPSC); (II) Poll Taxes, Articles 14 and 24, (the $40,000 poll tax demanded from Plaintiff to be split between Defendants SOS and RPSC); also, of course:  (III) Federal Hatch Act (1939) bribes and other criminal violations by a private corporation, RPSC, to a governmental unit, SOS.  Additional federal Hatch Act violations exist.  Defendant acknowledges Article 14 and 24 violations in its “Statement of Facts,” before The Court since October 2, 2015. Today is November 10, 2015. 

Tonight in Minnesota a national debate is scheduled.  Plaintiff is uninvited, in part because Defendant denied placement of Plaintiff name on the ballot for the S. C. Primary election.  Plaintiff is a military veteran and the ONLY decorated combat infantryman in the current field of potential persons for POTUS.  The integrity of the Court comes into question if Plaintiff is denied expeditious service and is damaged financially and otherwise further by refusing him an opportunity to resolve veteran issues from the Oval Office.  Plaintiff veteran is entitled to his Constitutional rights and needs them is a timely manner!.     

With dispatch The Court is asked to declare the demand by Defendant(s) RPSC and SOS of Plaintiff amounting to $40,000 in poll tax fees to split 50/50 between Defendants SOS and RPSC is in violation of Articles 14 and 24 of our Constitution thereby treating Plaintiff in an unequal manner and financially damaging and otherwise harming Plaintiff.

With dispatch the Court is asked to declare the demand by Defendant RPSC and SOS for a pledge to RPSC not to speak out in dispute of RPSC policy positions is a violation of Article 1, financially damaging and otherwise harmful to Plaintiff.  

With dispatch The Court is asked to declare SOS and RPSC in violation of Articles 14 and 24 of our Constitution for denying placement of the name of Thomas Joseph Coyne on the Primary ballot for POTUS in the 2016 S.C. elections thereby financially damaging and otherwise harming Plaintiff.

Written this 10th day of November,
2015 In Bath, Ohio USA

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
Attorney for Self
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333
Ground wire:  (330) 836-0563
Cell:  (330) 957-7962

____________________

I affirm each defendant named on page one of this complaint, plus the following persons are receiving a copy of by U.S. Postal Service:
             

  1. The United States District Court, District of South Carolina, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201.
  2. Karl Bowers, Bowers Law Office, P. O. Box 50549, Columbia, South Carolina 29250.
  3. The Republican Party of South Carolina, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201.
  4. South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Matt Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street, Suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 29201.
  5. Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice, Room  5111, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 29201.
  6. Other(s).

___________________

Posted November 9, 2015

INJUNCTION
EMERGENCY/EXPEDITED MOTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUGH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION

Thomas Joseph Coyne, Plaintiff                                                Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH

            Versus

South Carolina Secretary of State (SOS)
And South Carolina Republican (RPSC)
Party,
            Defendants
_________________________                           
PLAINTIFF THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE’S MEMORNANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MEMODRANDUM OPPOSING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
________________________
NATURE OF THE CASE

  1. Defendant(s) calls attention quickly to Plaintiff serving as attorney for self, pro se, almost as though Plaintiff’s defense of himself is a ‘dirty’ deed or ‘dirty’ word.  Self-defense is never a dirty word or dirty deed.  Defendant(s) thinks otherwise, considers it is a disrespectful slur useful to their cause?  Not so!  Pro se serves in this case as a term available for use by SOS and RPSC in ridicule similar to the way people who, having been attacked, are ridiculed for defending themselves instead of waiting for police to answer their call.  Additionally, RPSC and SOS are quick to label Plaintiff “frivolous” in an attempt to bypass the intentional emergency RPSC and SOS created for a candidate in line for the South Carolina Primary Presidential election who is not an “insider.”  The label benefits only persons recognized as ‘established’ life-long politicians.  This quiet change-of-Primary-Deadline-date action violates Plaintiff’s 14th Amendment rights for “equal protection of the laws.”  Additionally, the label documents nicely the effort to which SOS and RPSC go to protect one another’s agenda of control over who gets elected and who gets to vote for who gets elected.  SOS and RPSC is one another’s client in the poll tax business.
  1. Defendant thinks this change of date is structurally necessary for RPSC and SOS to establish, collect and split a $40,000 Poll Tax 50-50, $20,000 in cash going to each side, thereby limiting the rights of citizens to vote for a qualified person not hand-picked by RPSC financial backers. 

 

The $40,000.00 distribution of money is shared, financially kicked-back from a private corporation, RPSC, immediate recipient of the money, to a unit of government, SOS, for use by government employees.  It is a violation of the Hatch Act of 1939 for any government employee to work, promote and/or assist political persons or parties in this manner.  Also, distribution of this $40,000.00 violates the status quo of Plaintiff’s 14th Amendment “equal protection” rights (ratified July 9, 1868).  According to SOS and RPSC only established politicians, ones in office, one or more in line for the job of POTUS, receive benefits bought and paid from a $20,000.00 financial kick-back.  This SOS/RPSC collusion procedure represents unequal treatment of the law according to the 14th Amendment.   SOS disallows ANY person’s name to appear on the ballot absent receipt by SOS of its fifty percent (50%) $20,000 payment from the toll tax, a violation of the Hatch Act of 1939, and absent a pledge of allegiance to RPSC, a pledge cancelling the candidate’s Freedom of Speech. 

The government of South Carolina mandate requiring a private corporation, RPSC, to share its wealth with SOS in this unequal manner is illegal, unethical and unconstitutional.  This Poll Tax is unconstitutional, of course, but one other important point must be made:  Many military veterans fought hard and many died to defend our 14th Amendment.  Many other veterans are maimed for life, sitting currently while awaiting medical treatment in or near a Veteran Administration hospital precisely while Plaintiff, a combat veteran himself, is being denied equal protection of the laws, the very laws he and every veteran fought to protect, defend and support and remember:  every prominent government employee vows to God under oath to protect veterans.  S/he vows to uphold the veteran’s U.S. Constitution.  This vow is made before we the people, the citizens,  grant each appointed United States Judge and each appointed United State Magistrate Judge the privilege of his/her employment.  Each such government employee pledges allegiance and vows to protect the Constitution.  These government employees work for, and are responsible to all citizens of this nation.  U.S. citizens do not work for government; Government persons, to include Judges and others, are employees of the people!

  1. Plaintiff learned this on September 9, 2015:  RPSC and SOS, conspirators in executing this Poll Tax plan, changed the deadline date for registration of candidates wanting their name on the ballot for the Primary election of President, United States of America, POTUS, by sixty days (60).  This reduction in time to prepare is intentionally detrimental to all but establishment life-long professional politicians and government employees paid to assist them.  Government employees are NOT permitted to work full or part time to elect or work for or against election of any politician(s) or political party(s).  Source:  the federal Hatch Act of 1939. 

 

  1. The filing fee is a poll tax, acknowledged as such by RPSC and SOS in its October 2, 2015, “Statement of Facts:”  

“Pursuant to S.C. Code 7-11-20, half of that filing fee goes to the South Carolina State Election Commission for the costs associated with conducting the statewide primary election.  The remaining portion of the candidate filing fee is used for costs incurred by the SCGOP in conjunction with voter outreach, promotion, party building, and other legitimate political activities associated the (sic) primary election.  No fee or any other charge is assessed to any registered voter who wishes to cast a ballot in the SCGOP primary.”
RPSC and SOS control who can vote for a qualified candidate, who can get elected in a South Carolina primary election by controlling who gets his/her name on the ballot.  NO voter may elect any person not named on the ballot.  Plaintiff deserves to have his name on the Primary ballot!  Federal law (Hatch Act) and the 1st, 14th and 24th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution are violated automatically by SOS employees in accordance with current South Carolina primary election structure.  Deceit, deception and dishonesty exist; for example, Plaintiff knew NOTHING of the 50/50 split in poll tax receipts between RPSC ($20,000) and SOS ($20,000) until he was denied placement of his name on the ballot for (A) failure to pay the poll tax and (B) failure to pledge allegiance to the RPSC.    

  1. Plaintiff filed his complaint in Columbia, South Carolina in person, driving over twelve hours (12) non-stop from the state of Ohio, northeastern Ohio, in order to do so.  The issue was and is an emergency situation requiring immediate attention and action by The Federal Court; additionally, Defendant complains about Plaintiff being from Ohio and not registered to vote in South Carolina.  Apparently for the record Defendant must be reminded the state of Ohio is one of our fifty states (50), (not 57 states as claimed by the sitting POTUS).  As a member of the United States of America no citizen of Ohio needs to be “a registered voter in South Carolina” as pre-condition to demanding and receiving protection from the U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina.  Every U.S. citizen is entitled to protection from abusive government activity, from out-of-control government and/or governmental units when violations occur concerning the 1st and 14th and 24th Amendments. The Constitution limits the ‘power’ of government employees!  Defendant claims otherwise in its “Statement of Facts.”  Plaintiff deserves protection in federal court from South Carolina out-of-control government; the name of Plaintiff must be on the South Carolina Primary ballot.  Plaintiff is NOT required to pay a poll tax beforehand
  1. “Courts issue preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo litigation,” Defendant says.  Defendant cites former injunction cases claiming only “status quo” demands should be met by The Court.  Defendant appears to argue that SOS and RPSC have been violating the Constitution for a prolonged period of time and thereby created a “status quo” environment and therefore should be allowed to continue, but Defendant fails to understand the “status quo” exists also for the 14th and other Amendments (14th = 1868).  Defendant presents here nothing more than a straw-man argument at best and unworthy of attention by professional persons anywhere; after all, in its same Paragraph II Defendant proclaims:  “. . . it is axiomatic that poll taxes are unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.  It is clear that the right to vote may not constitutionally be conditioned upon the payment of a tax or fee”.  The poll tax of $40,000.00 controls the person for whom one may vote and is unconstitutional; additionally this Poll Tax reveals total lack of integrity on part of Defendant(s) in this instant case.

As an unknown candidate Plaintiff needs exposure of his solutions to national problems if he is to be successful in his quest to earn the right to serve as POTUS.  South Carolina has positioned itself politically to being the “first in the south” to hold a presidential primary.  If Plaintiff is denied the right he has earned to have his name appear on the primary election ballot Defendant has treated Plaintiff in an unequal manner, placing Plaintiff at further disadvantage to other candidates for the same office, ones financed in whole or in part by the SOS and RPSC poll tax. 

  1. Plaintiff suffers irreparable harm if preliminary injunction is not granted as demanded.  The injunction helps alleviate irreparable harm but does not eliminate it.  The poll tax is one part only of the scheme to control elections in South Carolina.  In conspiracy with SOS, RPSC says one must also sign a notarized pledge of allegiance to the propagation of faith in the RPSC, while presenting RPSC simultaneously with the $40,000.00, $20,000.00 of which gets kicked-back to government persons who help maintain existing persons in existing political positions.  (More on this subject below, dealing heavily with existing legislation, the status quo: the Federal Hatch Act of 1939.  Except for the President and Vice President of the United States of America, all federal, state and local government employees benefiting financially, professionally and otherwise from financial kickbacks (bribes, both taken and paid) from RPSC to SOS are in violation of the Hatch Act; also, additional criminal laws pertain to private corporations that bribe public officials).  A person who signs and has notarized the pledge to RPSC agrees to surrender another Constitutional right:  Freedom of Speech.  A person signing the “pledge” may not speak out against the leadership of RPSC.  SOS and RPSC appear to forget that one cannot be required to surrender ANY Constitutional right as precondition to having his/her name on the ballot in any primary election, anywhere in the USA.  Plaintiff’s name must appear on the primary ballot in South Carolina.

 Absent payment  of a $40,000.00 poll tax to RPSC, money to be split 50-50 between co-conspirators, SOS and RPSC Defendant proclaims:     

“The SCGOP and the Public interest will suffer substantial irreparable harm if preliminary injunctive relief is granted.  The SCGOP’s status as the “First in the South” Republican presidential primary is critically important to the continued status and vitality of the SCGOP as a leader in presidential politics in our country.  An order enjoining the SCGOP primary would cause irreparable harm to the SCGOP from which it would likely never recover.  Similarly, the citizens of South Carolina deserve an opportunity to vote on the Republican nominee for President of the United States.  An injunction in this frivolous case would destroy that opportunity, thereby causing irreparable harm to the public interest as well.”
It is not the obligation of government employees serving on The Court to concern itself with harm, irreparable or otherwise, to government SOS persons or to privately owned and operated RPSC; the obligation of The Court is to defend the Constitutional rights of citizens against abuse of power and position by government officials and politicians of every stripe;
 It is not the obligation of The Court to concern itself with “the SCGOP’s status and vitality as the “First in the South” Republican presidential primary;
It is not the obligation of The Court to rescue RPSC from failure, from a situation from which it “would likely never recover.” 
IT IS THE OBLIGATION OF THE COURT TO ASSURE CITIZENS OF SOUTH CAROLINA EVERY REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE ON THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.  THE COURT MUST ASSURE CITIZENS THE PERSON VOTED UPON WILL NOT BE ONE APPOINTED IN THE FUTURE AS S/HE HAS BEEN IN THE PAST.  THE COURT MUST HOLD THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN ITS HEART AND ISSUE THE INJUNCTION AS REQUESTED.  THE NAME OF THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE MUST BE MADE TO APPEAR ON THE SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

  1. Payment by RPSC to SOS violates the Hatch Act.  All (100%) government employees except the President and Vice President of the United States of America are subject to provisions of the Hatch Act; thus, all South Carolina Government Employees are subject, held accountable to Hatch Act violations.  No state government may arbitrarily exempt itself and/or its employees from provisions of the Hatch Act.  All South Carolina SOS employees in receipt of financial, professional and/or other benefits due to receipt of kicked-back money paid initially by RPSC, a private corporation, are in violation of provisions of the Hatch Act when they work to assist RPSC with its promotional and other political “work”.  

The Hatch Act (Act):  5 USC 7323 and 7324.  All civilian employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the President and the Vice President, are covered by the provisions of the Act.  For purposes of the Act, political activity is defined as an activity directed toward the success or failure of a political party (RPSC), candidate for partisan political office (Plaintiff), or partisan political group to include, but not limited to:  (A) use of official authority or influence to interfere with an election (conspire quietly to change the date of the Primary election), (B) solicit or discourage political activity of anyone (Plaintiff) with business before the agency (The Court) by mocking him with verbiage (frivolous, Pro Se) and/or producing slurs about him in writing in documents before the court (C), Solicit or receive political contributions ($20,000.00 each paid to and/or received by RPSC and SOS, (D) engage in political activity while (a) on duty or (b) in a government building (Outright laughter in the face of Plaintiff when Clerk staff learned he was attempting to compete for the office of POTUS, as he attempted to produce United States Postal System cash receipts demonstrating “Service” had been properly served by Plaintiff to Defendant and others as required by law,  Clerk’s office, Florence, South Carolina).  EACH item/event cited here is clearly documented, and provable by Defendant documents before The Court. 

Highly probable and provable with an investigation, but otherwise not provable at this writing is evidence of engagement in political activity (violations of Hatch Act) with respect to (A) misuse of government cell phone, (B) misuse of government equipment, (C) misuse of government leased vehicle, (D) misuse of government owned vehicle, (E) misuse of government travel card, (F) misuse of official government credentials, (G) misuse of government computers, (H) and the list goes on to include, of courses, noncompliance with administrative program policies and more.  Many more crimes are committed daily and while being paid by U.S. taxpayers.  Government employees in South Carolina abuse their power and position by denying Plaintiff placement of his name on the ballot for POTUS in the Primary election in South Carolina.  Their misbehavior in areas of Civil Rights, Ethics (“The platform of the South Carolina Republican Party emphasizes a strict adherence to the United States Constitution”), and Human Resources is encouraged and protected by The Court if this demand for inclusion on the list of candidates for POTUS is denied to Thomas Joseph Coyne. 

The name of Thomas Joseph Coyne must be placed on the primary ballot for POTUS in South Carolina.

CONCLUSION
This combat veteran of the U.S. infantry (Plaintiff) has NEVER failed to “carry his burden” as alleged by Defendant, nor has any other veteran known to Plaintiff!   The U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina is charged with the responsibility of protecting, defending and supporting the Constitution of the United States of America.  For SOS and RPSC to claim The U.S. District Court must protect the “SCGOP from irreparable harm from which it would likely never recover” is not true.  The Constitution is true; RPSC is violating it, most notably the 1st, 14th and 24th Amendments, each contained currently in the finest document ever written. 
NO COURT IN THE USA MAY IN JUSTICE AND GOOD CONSCIENCE FAIL TO ISSUE THE DEMANDED INJUNCTION IN A TIMELY ENOUGH MANNER TO ALLOW THE NAME OF THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE TO APPEAR ON THE BALLOT FOR INCLUSION IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY ELECTION of 2016 FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Respectfully submitted as written this 15th day of October, 2015
 
Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., (Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive, Bath, Ohio 44333, USA


www.coyne-assoc.com

  
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE:  I Thomas Joseph Coyne hereby certify and otherwise affirm that on October 15, 2015, I served Plaintiff Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Opposition to Motion of October 2, 2015 regarding Injunction with the Clerk of Court, Columbia, South Carolina using United States Postal Service and dealing with case number 3:15-cv-3669-JFA-SVH and on the same date I affirm also having sent copy of this Memorandum to the to the following:

  1.  Bowers Law Office, LLC, P.O. Box 59549, Columbia, South Carolina 29250;

(2)The United States District Court, District of South Carolina, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
(3) The Republican Party of South Carolina, Attention Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
(4) South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Matt Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street, Suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 29201;
(5) Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice, Room 5111, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. 29201;
(6) Other(s).

________________________________

Served 9/10/2015; Posted 11/26/2015

INJUNCTION
EMERGENCY/EXPEDITED MOTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333
Plaintiff.

V.

South Carolina Secretary of State
Office of Mark Hammond
1205 Pendelton Street; Suite 525
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
Defendants.
And

South Carolina Republican Party
Office of Nat Moore
1913 Marion Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

_____

In accordance with Rule 26.01:

No full name, address or telephone number of a person(s) or legal entity having a subrogation interest in this motion, if any, is known to me at this time.  I request expedited treatment.  Time is of the essence and I want a non-jury trial.  This motion is filed in Columbia as each defendant is located within walking distance of the court house, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, SC 29210 while I, of course, am located in Summit County, Ohio and definitely not within walking distance of the court house.

To the best of my knowledge and belief this request for expedited motion in whole or in part is not related to any other matter filed in this District of South Carolina, neither civil or criminal.

This motion is based on factual data associated with poll taxes and two Amendments (2) to the U.S. Constitution:  XIV and XXIV, the latter ratified in 1964.  All facts involved here have a long legal history, dealing with unreasonable burdens associated with poll taxes and dealing as well with one’s ability to vote for a qualified candidate of one’s choice.  This is not a frivolous legal action.  Required taxes paid to political parties who later kick-back some of the money for promotion and propagation of the Republican Party, in this case, is equivalent to poll taxes in discriminating effect.  Such taxes violate equal protection under the laws.  The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is violated by this SCRP/SC government tax, as is the 24th Amendment.

Section 1 of the 24th Amendment says “The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President . . . shall not be denied by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax. (Emphasis added).”  Section 2 declares:  “The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”  The intent of this Section 2 is for members of Congress to enforce “no poll tax or other tax legislation, not to transfer the financial benefits of poll and other taxes to members of Congress, to  Senator Graham and others, for example, as has been and is being done.  Members of Congress currently transfer poll tax benefits from government in general to themselves as members of Congress in particular.  This court is being asked to correct this blatant abuse of power and authority on part of Congress and its members.  This Court is hereby asked to strike down this U. S. Congressional abuse of Section 2 in particular, abuse of my rights guaranteed by the 24th Amendment in general.
______

The situation is this:

  1. The State of South Carolina and the Republican Party of South Carolina (SCRP) announced a date of November 30, 2015 as the deadline for registration of all candidates interested in wanting his/her name on the ballot for the Primary election of President, United States of America.  I want my name on that Primary election ballot.  Reducing the deadline date by 60 days, from November 30, 2015 to September 30, 2015, has been done and this change places unreasonable, discriminatory burden on myself and other persons attempting to comply with paper work associated with getting a name on the ballot. This 60 day reduction in time allotted violates equal protection under the law by SC government. This Court is asked here and now to disallow this change of date.

 

  1. My “Statement of Candidacy” for President of the USA, POTUS, was filed with the Federal Election Committee on July 27, 2015 and again on August 27, 2015.  No notice or acknowledgment has been received to date from FEC and no notification of change in deadline dates for state of South Carolina was received until my personal phone call to SC on September 9, 2015.

 

  1. The agreement between SC government and SC Republican Party goes beyond time constraints as it affects cash flow for each candidate. It controls who runs for office and who gets to vote for who runs for office.  It is criminal as well as civil in practice.  This Court is asked to disallow financial kick-backs to established politicians resulting and from manipulations of time frames for elections as has been done with a last-minute change in filing for name placement for the 2016 primary election date.
  1. The government of South Carolina “Elections Commission” was contacted by me personally on September 9, 2015 at which time I asked for information concerning requirements associated with getting my name on the South Carolina Primary Election ballot, for POTUS.  I was told the process was easy but the “deadline” date had been changed recently to September 30, 2015, approximately 20 days from this writing and too tight a time frame to allow anyone but professional insiders to respond; in fact, during my contact with SC Elections Commission, I learned candidates Bush, Carley, Carson, Graham (SC), Huckabee, Kasich, Paul, Santorum, Trump, and Walker have paid or will pay by September 28, 2015 and each has signed a pledge of support for the SCRP or agreed to specific dates to do these two things before the new deadline date – a date about which I knew nothing.   If 10 candidates pay $40,000 each to SCRP in accordance with the newly announced deadline, money available to be divided among SCRP ESTABLISHED POLITICIANS AND “friends” is $400,000.  People such as Senator Graham from SC should expect to receive additional tax free money, such payment(s), and such payment is in violation of Amendment 24 of our U.S. Constitution, and in violation of the intent of our Section 2 of Amendment 14.  When other states in the USA function in similar unethical manner, the cash windfall to established professional life-long politicians is astronomical, and serves to guarantee them a full life on the public payroll dole.  This poll tax existence and violation is a major factor in current decline of the USA and our culture.  Clearly, we have entrusted the affairs of state to the wrong people.  This Court is asked to disallow these current poll tax violations, to disallow state government receipt and/or distribution of this poll tax money to any citizen of South Carolina, or the nation.  

 

  1. To have my name on the primary election ballot I am told by SC Election Commission I am required to sign a form pledging allegiance to the South Carolina Republican Party (SCRP) and have it notarized.  The form is available only through SCRP who will send it when signed by me to South Carolina government officials.  This procedure is a SC government mandate before placement can be made of my name on the ballot.  This requirement is wrong!  It documents conspiracy between SC and SCRP; additionally, the signed, notarized form must be accompanied with a SCRP receipt of my cashier’s check, made payable by me to the South Carolina Republican Party - in the amount of $40,000.  “This $40,000 is distributed to various offices, persons and interests, mostly South Carolinians.  Whatever it takes to protect the Republican Party,” I was told.  NOTE:  No government, to include the government of South Carolina, or any other governmental unit, is operating within the meaning of any law when it serves as a collection agent for a tax-free 501-c-3 political organization, the Republican Party in this case.  This process is criminal!  I am a private citizen in need of government protection from criminals, and I do not expect government officials to be the very persons from whom I need protection; after all, government officials take a solemn oath to protect, support and defend my Constitution, most notably at this point Amendments 14 and 24.  Government at federal, state and local levels has failed to protect non-establishment persons.  The Court is asked to stop this governmental abuse in time for free, open elections for POTUS.  The Court is asked to recognize this manipulation of free, open democratic elections and disallow current manipulative activity, and do so promptly, in time for the upcoming primary election for POTUS.
  1. Section 2, Amendment 24:  “The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”  The intent of this language is to enforce Section 1, of the Amendment; the intent is NOT to financially enrich and prolong in public life-long professional well-established politicians.  This Court is asked to affirm my position here and to disallow financial enrichment of politicians who receive financial kick-backs from this poll tax.

 

  1. Section 1, Amendment 24:  “The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax. (Emphasis provided); Ratified:  1964.  This Court is asked to affirm my position here and to disallow collection of poll or other tax as pre-condition to allowing one to have his/her name on the primary ballot in SC, and do so in time to affect the 2016 national elections.
  1. Amendment 14 (ratified July 9, 1968), of our Constitution assured equal protection, equal apportionment under the law.  In the instance cited here I have no equality relative to Senator Graham or Donald Trump as each is expected to pay $40,000 to get his name on the ballot, nor do I deserve financial equity with Trump, but Graham may get money from SCRP, financial kick-backs from the SC government mandated and conspired poll tax.  Trump is entitled to his unequal treatment.  He spent his life making money and it is his to spend as he might like.  I spent life raising five (5) children and teaching college – with no regrets and no animosity towards Trump!  May God Bless him!  Graham is another matter!  Graham financially benefits from the SC poll tax and from the change in deadline date for placement of name for the Republican Party Primary Election.  Senator Graham passed the horrendous Graham-Leach-Bliley Act, (November, 1999), the causal piece of legislation directly responsible for chaos in banking (and employment) throughout the world - to include Greece and Germany and Japan and, of course, the USA.  This Court is asked to affirm my Constitutional right to refuse to pay this poll tax as pre-condition for placement of my name on the SC primary election ballot.  (NOTE:  I am NOT claiming inability to pay; I am stating unwillingness to pay a poll tax).

 

  1. The government of SC requires a $40,000 tax.  A poll tax.  An illegal poll tax.  An unconstitutional poll tax. I demand here that my name to be on the ballot without being required to pay an illegal tax, without having to pledge allegiance to the SC Republican Party.  A poll tax on candidates is every bit as invalid, illegal and in total violation of the 14th Amendment as a poll tax on voters.  Both taxes have the same negative, harmful, illegal unconstitutional impact on American society.  This Court is asked to affirm my Constitutional right not to pay this poll tax and disallow the tax; moreover, this Court is asked to disallow last minute manipulation of posted primary ballot acceptance dates, such as the 11/30/15 movement to 9/30/15.  It is 9/10/15 currently!
  1. SC government is required by law to hold a presidential election.  It is not required, nor is it permitted for SC to require a candidate, myself, for the office of President of the U.S. to make donations to a tax exempt political party (SCRP) as pre-condition for placement of candidate’s name, my name, on the ballot; yet, the SC government assurance to me on September 9, 2015 was this:  “If you do not sign the form, if you do not pay the money, you are not on the ballot.” This mandate is criminal behavior on the part of SC government!  This Court is asked to affirm my position here and to disallow SCRP from keeping my name off the ballot as SC has done to date.

 

  1. The Supreme Court of the United States in handling the Affordable Care Act, known also as “Obamacare,” declared mandates to be synonyms for taxes.  Our U.S. Congress passed legislation, with the help of Senator Lindsay Graham, to allow tax exempt donations to political parties (Republican Party in this instance) and the Political party is permitted to kick-back some of the money, such money going directly to established, life-long professional politicians who are running again and again and again for office, Senator Graham, among others, for example.  Graham is a full time, life-long heavily paid public employee of the American people and he will receive some of the $40,000 per candidate payable to SCRP he voted to allow – all in addition to his salary - while he runs full time for another, better, more powerful job and totally in violation of Constitutional Amendments 14 and 24.  This Court is asked here and now to disallow these payments!
  1. SC state government abuses the power and authority of its position as it continues to “poll tax” in the unreasonable, unconstitutional manner cited here.  This Court is asked here and now to disallow continuance of this unconstitutional behavior!

 

  1. Conspiracy exists between SCRP and SCgov.  This effort on my part is to stop the conspiracy and get my name on the ballot for the Primary election scheduled currently in South Carolina for February 20, 2016.  This Court is asked to affirm my position here. The Court is asked to declare my right to have my name, “Thomas Joseph Coyne”, Financial Economist, appear on the primary ballot in the State of South Carolina with such declaration by this Court occurring promptly, in more than minimal time for potential success in upcoming national elections of POTUS!
  1. THIS COURT IS ASKED HERE AND NOW TO DECLARE THIS $40,000 SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNMENT POLL TAX ILLEGAL, IN VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTION, SPECIFICALLY AMEDMENTS 14 AND 24, AND THIS COURT IS ASKED TO DIRECT SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNMENT TO PLACE THE NAME OF THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, FINANCIAL ECONOMIST, ON THE PRIMARY BALLOT ON OR BEFORE SOUTH CAROLINA’S SURPRISINGLY NEW MANDATED DEADLINE OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 AND WITHOUT RECEIVING A SIGNED PLEDGE BY COYNE TO SUPPORT THE PROPAGATION OF THE SC REPUBLICAN PARTY AND WITHOUT RECEIPT FROM COYNE OF THE ERRONEOUSLY “REQUIRED” $40,000.   

 

  1. I seek financial reimbursement of court costs and travel expenses; however, much more importantly, I seek enforcement of item 14, above.

 

Written the 10th day of September,
2015 in Bath, Ohio, USA and,

 

Most respectfully submitted,
Attorney for Self,

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
www.coyne-assoc.com
(330) 836-0563 – ground wire
(330) 957-7962 - cell
   
____________

I affirm here each defendant named on page one of this complaint is receiving a copy of this Complaint via certified mail and each defendant may be summoned as thought necessary by the U.S. Court of the District of South Carolina; namely (1) South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street; Suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 29201; and, (2) South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201.  Additionally, by certified mail the following persons are receiving a copy of this Complaint:  (1) Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice, Room 5111, 10th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 29201; and (2) United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite 500, Columbia, SC 29201.

 

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
www.coyne-assoc.com
(330) 836-0563 – ground wire
(330) 957-7962 - cell
_____________

November 5, 2015
                                       
TOREPUBLICAN PARTY CHAIRPERSON

FROMTHOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, MBA, PH.D., CANDIDATE FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OBJECT OF THIS COMMUNICATIONI write to alert you as Republican Party Chairperson and through you alert Party Members in your state, of my Declaration of Candidacy for the Office of President of the United States of America (POTUS) on the Republican ticket in upcoming national elections of 2016.  I will serve one term only (4 years).  I accept no financial contributions from anyone, anywhere.  Please provide me with the necessary form (s), if any, to assure placement of my name on the ballot in your state in adequate time for the Primary Election, or Caucus, and for the General Election. 

PRESENTI am an outsider, virtually unknown nationally and for that reason make myself readily available for speaking engagements and/or media interviews at almost any time and place.  I need use of available news media and university, business, church and labor forums to make my solutions known to a wide audience.  Please see and study:  www.coyne-assoc.com.

I have no representation in the White House, the U. S. Senate, or the U. S. House of Representatives, and neither do you.  The only job pursued with vigor by currently elected professional politicians is getting elected and reelected an endless number of times.  These insiders care nothing about you, me or the next person.  Insiders care only about milking the system, obtaining in the process more personal power, more money. Insider politicians care nothing about workers on our docks, our railroaders and retail establishment clerks and small business owners.  Insiders care nothing about the identical people needed to serve in our currently much-neglected military.  About truck drivers, nurses, doctors, bricklayers, plumbers, pilots, short-order cooks, and so on, life-long government persons care nothing.  Ditto for college and university students, for senior citizens and most especially veterans!     

Federal Reserve System: Banking is THE most important industry in every economic system in the world!  The greatest financial stabilizer of monetary and fiscal policy ever created by man (1913) is our Fed.  It is the only institution of its kind in the world.  When I visited in the former U.S.S.R. (1989) with Boards of Directors of each of their banks (2) the directors asked me about almost nothing other than our Fed.  (I met Boris Yeltzin on that trip).  Our Fed is in serious trouble:  The interest rate, the money supply, the Fed’s dual goals of (1) full employment and (2) price stability have been ruined as part of planned socialist efforts to kill capitalism, kill private property, kill the price system, and kill competitive markets.  Socialist appointments of Fed “Chairs” Greenspan, Bernanke and Yellen have inappropriately killed high and rising employment opportunities and have allowed our jobs to be transferred to hostile foreign lands.   Our banking structure shall be saved.  (The Graham-Leach-Bliley Act (November, 1999) must be cancelled and replaced with the Glass-Steagall Act it rescinded.  Please allow me the opportunity to restore proper banking structure and thereby create profitable private sector job opportunities.

College Students:  In overwhelming numbers college students attend government owned, operated and controlled colleges and universities.  These young people borrow money at outrageously high and rising tuition only to find they fail to graduate or, worse yet, graduate with a worthless piece of paper, while remaining in debt financially to government bureaucrats for the balance of their life.  Current elected insider government “officials” forgive carefully selected student debts if the student agrees to pursue a life dedicated to one of voting “properly”.  Allow me the opportunity to discontinue this financially and academically fraudulent governmental abuse of power and position.

PROPOSAL:  As POTUS:  I will ask each governor to organize an all-volunteer militia and I will ask Congress to finance research necessary to desalinate (no Salt) ocean water for domestic and foreign use.  English shall be established as the official language of the USA.  Social Security payments (entitlements) shall not be reduced or denied.  Federal government payments for abortions shall not be made. The Internal Revenue Code shall require an income tax of seven percent (7%) on ALL income received with no exemptions, deductions and/or exceptions.  Everyone plays, everyone pays. Veteran Administration corruption SHALL be corrected almost immediately.  The Constitution of the United States of America shall be protected to include, of course, the Second Amendment.  ISIS and armaments made available to ISIS by the Bush and Obama administrations shall be addressed and discontinued immediately.  Foreign policy, to include trade and treaties, shall be properly addressed.  Employment, output and income for ALL citizens of the USA shall be given first priority.  Our borders SHALL be secured.  Many existing “Departments” of the federal government shall be overhauled, with easily identifiable Agencies eliminated entirely.  The Department of Education shall discontinue its dumb-down-of-Americans campaign.  “Common Core” will be eliminated.  EPA shall be made accountable to Congress.  Each governmental Agency will be reminded employees of that Agency work for U. S. citizens; U. S. citizens do not exist to work and/or be controlled by any government Agency. A legitimate Department of Justice will be established.

Action:  World War III has begun.  We are losing.  I qualify easily as Commander-in-Chief whereas other candidates for POTUS do not! Germany’s Adolph Hitler lost War II but caused us to spend trillions of dollars, and watch the loss lose tens of millions of innocent lives.  As with our open borders Hitler wanted socialist powers to walk in and take control everywhere.  Adolph Hitler ‘only’ demanded National Socialism (NAZI).  We have now International Socialism. 

Please help by allowing the name of THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE onto the ballot(s) thereby allowing me the opportunity to earn election to POTUS?  Let me hear from you?

Respectfully,

Thomas Joseph Coyne
(Financial Economist)

________________________________

October 18, 2015

TO:  Secretary of State

FROM:  THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, MBA, PH.D.      www.coyne-assoc.com 

SUBJECT:  OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (POTUS)

OBJECT OF THIS COMMUNICATION 

ALERT YOU AND YOUR CONSTITUTIENTS OF MY DECLARATION OF CANDIDACY IN BEING ELECTED ON THE REPUBLICAN TICKET TO THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE UPCOMING NATIONAL ELECTIONS OF 2016.  I WILL SERVE ONE TERM ONLY (4 YEARS).  PLEASE PROVIDE ME WITH APPROPRIATE FORM(S) NECESSARY TO ASSURE PLACEMENT OF MY NAME ON THE BALLOT IN YOUR STATE IN ADEQUATE TIME TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL; however, no form requiring surrender to the Republican Party of my Freedom of Speech (1st Amendment) shall be signed, and no poll tax shall be paid (14th and 24th Amendments).

YOUR COOPERATION IS MOST SNCERELY APPRICIATED.

PRESENT

I AM VIRTUALLY UNKNOWN NATIONALLY AND FOR THAT REASON MAKE MYSELF READILY AVAILABLE FOR SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS AND/OR MEDIA INTERVIEWS AT ALMOST ANY REASONABLE TIME AND PLACE.  I NEED USE OF AVAILABLE MEDIA AND UNIVERSITY FORUM TO MAKE SOLUTIONS KNOWN TO THE WIDEST AUDIENCE. 

SEE MY SOLUTIONS, WEB PAGE:  (A) SOCIAL SECURITY; (B) EDUCATION; (C) BANKING STRUCTURE (WE MUST CANCEL THE GRAHAM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT AND REPLACE IT WITH THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT IT RESCINDED); (D) EMPLOYMENT; (E) ABORTION; (F) SECURE THE BORDERS; (G) FOREIGN POLICY, TO INCLUDE TRADE/TREATIES; (H) COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF; (I) 7% TAX ON TOTAL INCOME: EVERYONE PLAYS SO EVERYONE PAYS, TO INCLUDE SO-CALLED ‘NOT FOR PROFIT’ BUSINESSES, (J) VETERAN SUFFERING, VA; (K) PROTECT RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS; (L) ISIS, AND MUCH MORE.

PROPOSAL:
           

  1. EACH GOVERNOR IN EACH STATE WILL BE ASKED TO ORGANIZE AN ALL-VOLUNTEER WELL DISCIPLINED, WELL EQUIPED MILITIA.  (WE NEED BACK-UP TO OUR MILITARY THAT OBAMA WORKS DAILY TO RUIN).
  2. WE HAVE THE TALENT TO DESALINATE (NO SALT) THE OCEANS, WITH FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS ALMOST READY.  UNIVERSITY RESEARCH PAPERS ARE IN PROGRSS.
  3. ENGLISH SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE OF THE USA.       

______________________________________________________________________________

Do whatever it takes to Install in the Office of President of the United States of America: THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, BBA, MBA, Ph.D. - tom@coyne-assoc.com.

                     


    

This photo was taken (circa 1965) by Lennart Nilsson and appeared in Life Magazine as one of the most important pictures of the 20th century.  This child is 18 weeks old, the age of many children killed currently in the USA by Planned Parenthood, a highly profitable and government financed tax-exempt (501-c-3) organization.  When Tom Coyne is President of the United States of America no 501-c-3 organization will be tax-free.  If we all play, we all pay! As President of the United States of America Tom Coyne will cancel the current Internal Revelnue Code: ALL persons earning and/or receiving money from whatever source shall pay a tax of seven (7%) percent of money received with NO deductions, exemptions and/or exceptions! Period! Additionally, there shall be NO government financed killings (murders) of unborn children, with NO exceptions for any real or imagined reason. This Coyne IRS mandate shall include ALL so-called not-for-profit organizations, such groups earn a profit or go out of business, but remain tax free. This privilege is wrong. "Not-for-profit" groups are not-for-tax corporations. Their MAJOR goal is to avoid taxes, to pretend "profit" is a dirty word. Profit is not a dirty word! Profit is taxed. All expenses in government are paid due to taxation of profitable firms, or with borrowed money. The current practice of excessive government borrowing of money shall stop during the Coyne Administration. "Not-for-profit" firms play; therefore, not-for-profit firms have to pay!

Planned Parenthood and similar tax free groups murder (kill) the most innocent of innocent persons among us! Children similar to the little innocent and very much alive person whose photo is revealed here are murdered daily to obtain their body parts: liver, lungs (2), eyes (2) (blue eyes sell at a premium, most notably in Asia and Africa), kidney (2) and, of course the heart. What happens to the soul remains a mystery! The body parts are sold after a painful and dreadful death! Each killed child loses her/his right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happines." This pracitce shall not be financed by the federal government in the Coyne Administration.

Since 1973 in excess of seventy-three million lives (73,000,000) have been taken, killed, by Planned Parenthood-type organizations, about thirty-three percent of these murders (33%) were children of African-American, Black or whatever the current politically correct name for this group of normally highly patriotic and God-loving, God-fearing Americans is. Genocide is occurring in the American Black community, all of which is taking place while we "enjoy" the policies and practices of our "first Black President," one Barack Hussein Obama, known for approximately twenty-six (26) of his years on earth as Barry Soetoro of Jakarta, Indonesia. (Be sure to see and enjoy the 8 foot bronze and marble statute of "Little Barry" sitting currently on the grounds of the St. Francis of Assisi Roman Catholic Elementary School in Jakarts, Indonesias, where Barry attended grade (elementary) school and graduated as a Muslim student). Obama/Soetoro went later to a Muslim-only high school in Jakarta before coming to the USA under a Fullbright Grant, a financial grant with additional benefits reserved ONLY for foreign born persons. Note: Our highly regarded Black community suffers twice under this Obama arrangement as our so-called "Department of Justice" in reality is nothing more than a Department of Legal Affairs - in all too many cases with little or no "justice" prvailing. This ciminal activity will change also in the Coyne Administration! Seventry-three million persons killed is a number exceeding the entire population of many well-known nations.

A few other points. (1) The current foreign exchange rate between the Chinese Yuan and the American dollar should be 5:1. Five Chinese Yuan should buy one American dollar. Someone should tell John Kerry? The current "official Chinese" exchange rate is approximately 6.5 - 7.0 to the dollar. In the Black Market in China the price of the dollar is much higher; (2) English must be estalished as the "official" languare of the USA. To get along well together we must be able to communicate - with nothing lost in translation; (3) Our borders MUST and Shall Be secure. A proper reallocation of existing assets will do the job nicley, and the government of Mexico will be glad to coopeerate; (4) Our current and highly profitable Social Security program will be amended. Please see: world_finance.htm, for the Coyne solution on this web page: www. coyne-assoc.com; (5) If Putin and/or Russia want the Crimea and/or Ukraine, Russia should do as we did when we wanted Alaska. We bought Alaska from Russia. Russia should purchase or lease Crimea. I can show Putin how to do it; (6) We entered into (purchased) The Louisiana Purchase when we needed several states in the South and Southwest of mainland USA. We pay our way! Russia "bullies" its way, conduct Coyne considers unacceptable; (7) If Israel wants Palestine territory, Israel should purchase it, the "Louisiana Purchase" way; (8) Banking is the most important industry in every economy: capitalist, socialist, and/or communist. The Graham-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) must be rescinded, replaced with the Glass-Steagall Act it repealed. GLBA is THE causal factor of current national and international economic/financial and employment crises to include, of course, Greece, and to include Germany as well; (9) Government Agencies such as EPA, Department of Education, and all others will be required to reveal results of legitimate research and suggest improvements resulting therefrom, advising us what we SHOULD or COULD do, but under no circumstances will government Agencies mandate what we SHALL do. What we SHALL do is a function of elected officials in our U.S. House of Representatives and U.S.Senate. What we shall do is not a proper function for appointed, nameless employees of one or more government Agency; (10) Health Care shall be provided by a larger number of competent practicing physicians, M.D. men and women devoted to protecting life, by creation of a larger number of additional and fully accredited Medical Colleges (M.D.); (11) Each of our fifty (50) states shall be encouraged to develop an all-volunteer, well-armed, well-equipped, tightly disciplined Militia, one responsible directly to the governor of each state; and, (12) Protection of private property, the price system, competition, freedom and independence betweem and among citizens will be handled with dispatch in a manner designed to gain and maintain peaceful, tranquil public support. Get in touch with Tom? Do whatever you are able to provide non-financial support: Tom Coyne for POTUS!

Tom Coyne, combat veteran, U.S. Army Infantry, is the ONLY person named to date for the Office of President of the United States of America with experience necessary to serve as Commander-in-Chief of our Armed Forces. We are at war as we speak, World War III, and such a condition is no time for immature on-the-job-training. A one-term Coyne-operated presidency is needed at this time and will occur subsequent to national elections in 2016. President Tom Coyne knows how to handle Iran for example, a rogue state since 1979, and before, but only if you help.

_______________________________

INJUNCTION
EMERGENCY/EXPEDITED MOTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Thomas Joseph Coyne
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
Bath, Ohio 44333
Plaintiff.

V.

South Carolina Secretary of State
Office of Mark Hammond
1205 Pendelton Street; Suite 525
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
Defendants.
And

South Carolina Republican Party
Office of Nat Moore
1913 Marion Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

_____

In accordance with Rule 26.01: No full name, address or telephone number of a person(s) or legal entity having a subrogation interest in this motion, if any, is known to me at this time.  I request expedited treatment.  Time is of the essence and I want a non-jury trial.  This motion is filed in Columbia as each defendant is located within walking distance of the court house, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, SC 29210 while I, of course, am located in Summit County, Ohio and definitely not within walking distance of the court house.

To the best of my knowledge and belief this request for expedited motion in whole or in part is not related to any other matter filed in this District of South Carolina, neither civil or criminal.

This motion is based on factual data associated with poll taxes and two Amendments (2) to the U.S. Constitution:  XIV and XXIV, the latter ratified in 1964.  All facts involved here have a long legal history, dealing with unreasonable burdens associated with poll taxes and dealing as well with one’s ability to vote for a qualified candidate of one’s choice.  This is not a frivolous legal action.  Required taxes paid to political parties who later kick-back some of the money for promotion and propagation of the Republican Party, in this case, is equivalent to poll taxes in discriminating effect.  Such taxes violate equal protection under the laws.  The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is violated by this SCRP/SC government tax, as is the 24th Amendment.

Section 1 of the 24th Amendment says “The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President . . . shall not be denied by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax. (Emphasis added).”  Section 2 declares:  “The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”  The intent of this Section 2 is for members of Congress to enforce “no poll tax or other tax legislation, not to transfer the financial benefits of poll and other taxes to members of Congress, to  Senator Graham and others, for example, as has been and is being done.  Members of Congress currently transfer poll tax benefits from government in general to themselves as members of Congress in particular.  This court is being asked to correct this blatant abuse of power and authority on part of Congress and its members.  This Court is hereby asked to strike down this U. S. Congressional abuse of Section 2 in particular, abuse of my rights guaranteed by the 24th Amendment in general.
______

The situation is this:

1.The State of South Carolina and the Republican Party of South Carolina (SCRP) announced a date of November 30, 2015 as the deadline for registration of all candidates interested in wanting his/her name on the ballot for the Primary election of President, United States of America.  I want my name on that Primary election ballot.  Reducing the deadline date by 60 days, from November 30, 2015 to September 30, 2015, has been done and this change places unreasonable, discriminatory burden on myself and other persons attempting to comply with paper work associated with getting a name on the ballot. This 60 day reduction in time allotted violates equal protection under the law by SC government. This Court is asked here and now to disallow this change of date.

2. My “Statement of Candidacy” for President of the USA, POTUS, was filed with the Federal Election Committee on July 27, 2015 and again on August 27, 2015.  No notice or acknowledgment has been received to date from FEC and no notification of change in deadline dates for state of South Carolina was received until my personal phone call to SC on September 9, 2015.

3The agreement between SC government and SC Republican Party goes beyond time constraints as it affects cash flow for each candidate. It controls who runs for office and who gets to vote for who runs for office.  It is criminal as well as civil in practice.  This Court is asked to disallow financial kick-backs to established politicians resulting and from manipulations of time frames for elections as has been done with a last-minute change in filing for name placement for the 2016 primary election date.

4. The government of South Carolina “Elections Commission” was contacted by me personally on September 9, 2015 at which time I asked for information concerning requirements associated with getting my name on the South Carolina Primary Election ballot, for POTUS.  I was told the process was easy but the “deadline” date had been changed recently to September 30, 2015, approximately 20 days from this writing and too tight a time frame to allow anyone but professional insiders to respond; in fact, during my contact with SC Elections Commission, I learned candidates Bush, Carley, Carson, Graham (SC), Huckabee, Kasich, Paul, Santorum, Trump, and Walker have paid or will pay by September 28, 2015 and each has signed a pledge of support for the SCRP or agreed to specific dates to do these two things before the new deadline date – a date about which I knew nothing.   If 10 candidates pay $40,000 each to SCRP in accordance with the newly announced deadline, money available to be divided among SCRP ESTABLISHED POLITICIANS AND “friends” is $400,000.  People such as Senator Graham from SC should expect to receive additional tax free money, such payment(s), and such payment is in violation of Amendment 24 of our U.S. Constitution, and in violation of the intent of our Section 2 of Amendment 14.  When other states in the USA function in similar unethical manner, the cash windfall to established professional life-long politicians is astronomical, and serves to guarantee them a full life on the public payroll dole.  This poll tax existence and violation is a major factor in current decline of the USA and our culture.  Clearly, we have entrusted the affairs of state to the wrong people.  This Court is asked to disallow these current poll tax violations, to disallow state government receipt and/or distribution of this poll tax money to any citizen of South Carolina, or the nation.  

5. To have my name on the primary election ballot I am told by SC Election Commission I am required to sign a form pledging allegiance to the South Carolina Republican Party (SCRP) and have it notarized.  The form is available only through SCRP who will send it when signed by me to South Carolina government officials.  This procedure is a SC government mandate before placement can be made of my name on the ballot.  This requirement is wrong!  It documents conspiracy between SC and SCRP; additionally, the signed, notarized form must be accompanied with a SCRP receipt of my cashier’s check, made payable by me to the South Carolina Republican Party - in the amount of $40,000.  “This $40,000 is distributed to various offices, persons and interests, mostly South Carolinians.  Whatever it takes to protect the Republican Party,” I was told.  NOTE:  No government, to include the government of South Carolina, or any other governmental unit, is operating within the meaning of any law when it serves as a collection agent for a tax-free 501-c-3 political organization, the Republican Party in this case.  This process is criminal!  I am a private citizen in need of government protection from criminals, and I do not expect government officials to be the very persons from whom I need protection; after all, government officials take a solemn oath to protect, support and defend my Constitution, most notably at this point Amendments 14 and 24.  Government at federal, state and local levels has failed to protect non-establishment persons.  The Court is asked to stop this governmental abuse in time for free, open elections for POTUS.  The Court is asked to recognize this manipulation of free, open democratic elections and disallow current manipulative activity, and do so promptly, in time for the upcoming primary election for POTUS.

6.Section 2, Amendment 24:  “The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”  The intent of this language is to enforce Section 1, of the Amendment; the intent is NOT to financially enrich and prolong in public life-long professional well-established politicians.  This Court is asked to affirm my position here and to disallow financial enrichment of politicians who receive financial kick-backs from this poll tax.

7. Section 1, Amendment 24:  “The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax. (Emphasis provided); Ratified:  1964.  This Court is asked to affirm my position here and to disallow collection of poll or other tax as pre-condition to allowing one to have his/her name on the primary ballot in SC, and do so in time to affect the 2016 national elections.

8. Amendment 14 (ratified July 9, 1968), of our Constitution assured equal protection, equal apportionment under the law.  In the instance cited here I have no equality relative to Senator Graham or Donald Trump as each is expected to pay $40,000 to get his name on the ballot, nor do I deserve financial equity with Trump, but Graham may get money from SCRP, financial kick-backs from the SC government mandated and conspired poll tax.  Trump is entitled to his unequal treatment.  He spent his life making money and it is his to spend as he might like.  I spent life raising five (5) children and teaching college – with no regrets and no animosity towards Trump!  May God Bless him!  Graham is another matter!  Graham financially benefits from the SC poll tax and from the change in deadline date for placement of name for the Republican Party Primary Election.  Senator Graham passed the horrendous Graham-Leach-Bliley Act, (November, 1999), the causal piece of legislation directly responsible for chaos in banking (and employment) throughout the world - to include Greece and Germany and Japan and, of course, the USA.  This Court is asked to affirm my Constitutional right to refuse to pay this poll tax as pre-condition for placement of my name on the SC primary election ballot.  (NOTE:  I am NOT claiming inability to pay; I am stating unwillingness to pay a poll tax).

10. The government of SC requires a $40,000 tax.  A poll tax.  An illegal poll tax.  An unconstitutional poll tax. I demand here that my name to be on the ballot without being required to pay an illegal tax, without having to pledge allegiance to the SC Republican Party.  A poll tax on candidates is every bit as invalid, illegal and in total violation of the 14th Amendment as a poll tax on voters.  Both taxes have the same negative, harmful, illegal unconstitutional impact on American society.  This Court is asked to affirm my Constitutional right not to pay this poll tax and disallow the tax; moreover, this Court is asked to disallow last minute manipulation of posted primary ballot acceptance dates, such as the 11/30/15 movement to 9/30/15.  It is 9/10/15 currently! SC government is required by law to hold a presidential election.  It is not required, nor is it permitted for SC to require a candidate, myself, for the office of President of the U.S. to make donations to a tax exempt political party (SCRP) as pre-condition for placement of candidate’s name, my name, on the ballot; yet, the SC government assurance to me on September 9, 2015 was this:  “If you do not sign the form, if you do not pay the money, you are not on the ballot.” This mandate is criminal behavior on the part of SC government!  This Court is asked to affirm my position here and to disallow SCRP from keeping my name off the ballot as SC has done to date.

11. The Supreme Court of the United States in handling the Affordable Care Act, known also as “Obamacare,” declared mandates to be synonyms for taxes.  Our U.S. Congress passed legislation, with the help of Senator Lindsay Graham, to allow tax exempt donations to political parties (Republican Party in this instance) and the Political party is permitted to kick-back some of the money, such money going directly to established, life-long professional politicians who are running again and again and again for office, Senator Graham, among others, for example.  Graham is a full time, life-long heavily paid public employee of the American people and he will receive some of the $40,000 per candidate payable to SCRP he voted to allow – all in addition to his salary - while he runs full time for another, better, more powerful job and totally in violation of Constitutional Amendments 14 and 24.  This Court is asked here and now to disallow these payments!

12. SC state government abuses the power and authority of its position as it continues to “poll tax” in the unreasonable, unconstitutional manner cited here.  This Court is asked here and now to disallow continuance of this unconstitutional behavior!

13. Conspiracy exists between SCRP and SCgov.  This effort on my part is to stop the conspiracy and get my name on the ballot for the Primary election scheduled currently in South Carolina for February 20, 2016.  This Court is asked to affirm my position here. The Court is asked to declare my right to have my name, “Thomas Joseph Coyne”, Financial Economist, appear on the primary ballot in the State of South Carolina with such declaration by this Court occurring promptly, in more than minimal time for potential success in upcoming national elections of POTUS!

14. THIS COURT IS ASKED HERE AND NOW TO DECLARE THIS $40,000 SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNMENT POLL TAX ILLEGAL, IN VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTION, SPECIFICALLY AMEDMENTS 14 AND 24, AND THIS COURT IS ASKED TO DIRECT SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNMENT TO PLACE THE NAME OF THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, FINANCIAL ECONOMIST, ON THE PRIMARY BALLOT ON OR BEFORE SOUTH CAROLINA’S SURPRISINGLY NEW MANDATED DEADLINE OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 AND WITHOUT RECEIVING A SIGNED PLEDGE BY COYNE TO SUPPORT THE PROPAGATION OF THE SC REPUBLICAN PARTY AND WITHOUT RECEIPT FROM COYNE OF THE ERRONEOUSLY “REQUIRED” $40,000.   

15. I seek financial reimbursement of court costs and travel expenses; however, much more importantly, I seek enforcement of item 14, above.

Written the 10th day of September,
2015 in Bath, Ohio, USA and,

Most respectfully submitted,
Attorney for Self,

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
www.coyne-assoc.com
(330) 836-0563 – ground wire
_______________________

I affirm here each defendant named on page one of this complaint is receiving a copy of this Complaint via certified mail and each defendant may be summoned as thought necessary by the U.S. Court of the District of South Carolina; namely (1) South Carolina Secretary of State, Office of Mark Hammond, 1205 Pendelton Street; Suite 525, Columbia, South Carolina 29201; and, (2) South Carolina Republican Party, Office of Nat Moore, 1913 Marion Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201.  Additionally, by certified mail the following persons are receiving a copy of this Complaint:  (1) Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice, Room 5111, 10th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 29201; and (2) United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina, 1441 Main Street, Suite 500, Columbia, SC 29201.

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
(Financial Economist)
535 Haskell Drive
www.coyne-assoc.com
(330) 836-0563 – ground wire
_____________

September 19, 2015

Pope Francis, S. J.
Vatican City 
Rome, Italy

Re:  Involvement in American affairs

Dear Pope Francis:

  1. If you want the Roman Catholic Church to involve itself in domestic American politics register Church as a legitimate political party;
  2. Please address the real church problems, (a)  Money laundering at and by The Bank of the Vatican, and (b) Child abuse by clergy and “other” church officials;
  3. This country was founded by Americans to escape church-domination of their lives throughout Europe and your attempt at sedition is not welcome; and,
  4. I remember clearly the damage done to mankind by Pope Pius XII (Hitler’s Pope) and the millions of lives and fortunes lost because of his dereliction of duty.  PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW YOURSELF AND MY CHURCH to error badly again!

Respectfully,

Thomas Joseph Coyne

__________________

THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, MBA, PH.D., ( FMCS arbitrator #1419); contact:  Email: (1) tom@coyne-assoc.com

First Business Address:                                            Second Business Address:
Coyne & Associates, Inc.                                            Coyne & Associates, Inc.
535 Haskell Dr.                                                           300 Stoveheath Dr., (Captain Unit) 
Akron, Ohio 44333                                                     Barboursville, WV 25504

EDUCATION:
Post-doctoral study:  Monetary Theory/Price Theory, University of Chicago
Post-doctoral study:  Computers, University of Michigan
Ph. D, Economics/Investments/Finance, Case Western Reserve University
MBA, Management/Finance, Kent State University
BBA, Accounting/Economics, Marshall University

ARBITRATION/LABOR RELATIONS EXPERIENCE:
I am a tenured Full Professor of Finance (inactive) and active Financial Economist.  I served for approximately eight years as Chief Negotiator, Boards of Education, State of Ohio, responsible for many hundreds of cases dealing heavily with finance.  I traveled extensively in Russia, Byelorussia, Brussels, Latvia, Croatia, Holland, England, and Ireland, France, Moscow, Leningrad, and other locations, lecturing and/or presenting papers in labor-related Finance.  I publish an online newsletter.  See:
www.coyne-assoc.com; also,  I have served on expedited arbitration panels, as a permanent umpire for the U. S. Air Force, Heath, Ohio, and as fact finder for scores of education cases in the state of Ohio.  I am a former B&O railroad brakeman, a former C&O railroad officer, a tenured, full-time professor of finance/economics at fully accredited (AACSB) universities (MBA studies) for 33 years.  I have extensive experience in securities and with the highly paid sports figure, and am eligible for Department of Defense and other government assignments.  My Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code number is 3BHC0.  I am a licensed pilot.  I hosted a live call-in talk radio show.  I am available for foreign assignments.  I am an honorably discharged combat infantry veteran of the Korean War, recipient of the Korean Service Medal with two (2) Bronze Service Stars, the United Nations Service Medal, the National Defense Medal, the Combat Infantry Badge (CIB), the Good Conduct Medal, and a Letter of Appreciation from Kim Dae-Jung, President of the Republic of Korea.  I am a former member of the National Association of Securities Dealers Association (NASD) Board of Arbitrators, a member of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service board of Arbitrators, and a member of the National Mediation Board, Washington, D. C. , . Former member of the National Association of Securities Dealers Association (NASD) Board of Arbitrators, Arbitrator number A32874, an active member of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service Board of Arbitrators, Arbitrator number 1419, and a member of the National Mediation Board.INDUSTRIES:  Aerospace; automotive, coal, education, mining, nuclear energy, police and fire, printing and publishing, railroads, rubber and tire, steel, transportation, plus others.

ISSUES:  Absenteeism, conduct, discipline non-discharge/discharge, race, posting/bidding, past practices, pension and welfare plans.  I excel in solving finance related disputes arising as a result of planned, back-dating of employee date of hire time, location and years worked for entitlement of pension(s) purposes.   

PERMANENT PANELS:

  1. District 1199WVKYOH, SEIU, AFL-CIO, and Pride in Logan County, Inc., 9/1/03 – 9/1/06.
  2. Ohio Nurses Association and the Western Reserve Care System, 2001 – present.
  3. National Bituminous Coal Producers Association and the United Mine Workers of America, District, #2, Pennsylvania, 1990 to 1994.
  4. United States Air Force, Heath, Ohio, 1997 until closure of the Air Station.
  5. McDowell County Commission on Again, January 1, 2012 through March 25, 2014, McDowell County Commissioners and SEIU, Huntington, West Virginia.

 

PUBLISHED CASES:

117LA, BNA, pp. 389-393, 8/28/02; 116 LA, BNA, pp. 545-550, 12/26/01; ll5 LA, BNA, 9/19/01, pp. 1720-1728; LA ll5, BNA, pp. 1720-1728, 3/13/01;  ll4 LA BNA, pp. 1097-1103, 9/6/00; ll2 LA BNA, pp. 1088-1011, 7/20/99; 111 LA BNA pp. 133-137, 8/31/998; 110 LA BNA, pp. 1107-1109m 8/12/98; BNA, pp 961-964, 2/26/97; CCH, pp 7670-7676, 2/11/97; BNA, pp 103-197, 4/17/96; BNA, 9/11/95; CCH, pp, 5307-5311, 10/4/94; CCH, 2/20/92 plus many others.

SIGNIFICANT PUBLICATIONS:  

Awards: Unless notified by the parties to the contrary and in advance of the oral hearing, all Awards are submitted for publication consideration.  Books: (1) License to Lie, fiction, (ISBN: 0-9633192-2-1), 2000; (2) How to Take Charge of Yourself, Your Money, Your Government, College, non-fiction, (ISBN: 0-9633182-1-3), 1999; Readings in Managerial Economics, college, (MBA), (ISBN: 0-9633192-0-5), 1992; Managerial Economics:  Analysis and Cases Fifth Edition, college, (ISBN: 0-256-02698-X), 1984; and The Coyne Report: October, 2011(Revere Local Government Schools), ISBN 9-781470-006433, 2012, plus monographs and several other books.

Articles:  (Refereed), “Individually Selected Stocks versus Mutual Funds,” Personal Financial Planning, January/February, 1999; The Coyne Quarterly, Internet online: www.coyne-assoc.com, plus about 100 other refereed and non-refereed articles.

FEES:      
PER DIEM FEE:  $1,000.00    

DOCKETING FEE:  None; however, a non-refundable one day fee ($1,000) is payable upon confirmation of selection with such fee credited in full to the parties when Award and final invoice is submitted. 

CANCELLATION FEE:    Almost never is a cancellation fee necessary and none is charged provided the oral hearing is cancelled early enough to fill the time slot; otherwise, a one day per diem is charged.

Interest Arbitration, Fact-finding and Labor Mediation:  Arbitrator charges $1,000.00 per day with 5.5 hours comprising one day; travel time is charged for one day if the distance is greater than 200 miles one way; study time is charged one day for each day necessary; a flat-fee of $150 is charged for administrative expenses, to include telephone, postage, fax and similar charges.

Expenses:  Arbitrator charges all actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred (i.e. air, hotel, rental, food).  Automobile mileage is charged at the applicable IRS expense rate.

In compliance with FMCS Rules this fee

____________

The following is a copy of the authenitic birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama II, a/k/a Barry Soetoro for approximately 26 of his 52 years on earth. This copy has appeared on this web page in years past, first having been supplied to Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D., on June 10, 2010:

 

May 17, 2015

TO: Citizens of Bath Township and Summit County, Ohio
FROM:  Tom Coyne ©
SUBJECT:  Bath Township Trustee and Summit County Council participation in:  (1) Legalized Theft; (2) Governmental Abuse of Power and Position.

  1. EPA issued a financial water and sewer “mandate” on City of Akron as Akron leaders had  failed to maintain satisfactory sanitary and storm sewers.  Our U.S. Supreme Court declared “mandate” a synonym for the word “tax.”  Akron’s EPA tax on water exceeds the price of water in your water bill by an amount in excess of 100%.  No good or service anywhere is allowed a tax rate in excess of 100% of price.  Additionally, (1) No federal government agency has authority to tax, and (2) No city in Ohio has authority to tax persons from other cities.  Akron and EPA are guilty of fraudulent governmental abuse.  Food is not taxed as it is needed for life, water is more critical to life than food!  The tax on water MUST be removed!  
  2. Townships in the state of Ohio may not impose personal income taxes on citizens.  Using a legal device created by Bath Trustees ito impose income taxes on Bath citizens, the “Joint Economic Development District (J.E.D.D.),” residents and non-residents pay personal income taxes to Akron and Fairlawn who, in turn, kick-back part of that tax to Trustees of Bath.  NO citizen of Bath had or has a voice into the amount of city income tax required.  No Bath citizen may vote for or against any politician in Akron or Fairlawn.  To avoid “taxation without representation” we fought and won the Revolutionary War!  Eliminate the unjust JEDD tax!
  3. Bath Township Issue 8 called “Our Library” unjustly allowed a tax increase and a tax rate renewal generating additional millions of dollars for an obsolete institution: libraries.  Bath Trustees and Summit County Council members placed #8 on the ballot at huge expense, the ONLY item to be voted upon, and on a carefully selected date when almost no taxpayer ever votes! This procedure is unjust, makes a mockery of freedom, democracy!  We deserve a Justice System; we have only an insufficient legal system.
  4. A Tornado Alert sounds routinely in nearby Fairlawn at taxpayer expense.  There has never been a tornado in Summit County.  Government reported one in 2012, and earlier, but each time it was only than high winds.  Tornados require large areas of flat land to develop and destroy.  Summit County has hills, not flat land.  Summit County has never had a tornado!

Demand cancelation of the water tax, and the JEDD tax, “A” and “B” above, and politically unethical, unjust, unreasonable taxing and spending as cited in paragraphs C and D.  Contact: bcorbett@bathtownship.org; egoodrich@bathtownship.org; and, jnelson@bathtownship.org

Professional politicians serve only themselves and political Party bosses, who tell them how to vote!  Only Democrat (D) or Republican (R) candidates gain office.  Independent candidates have no chance, are denied access to the ballot.  The U.S. Constitution, Amendment I, (Ratified December 15, 1791) guarantees one the right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” but no grievance process exists.  Federal Courts are worthless in these cases.  “We the people” are not served, are never served, have NO representation, no voice, not in the White House, U.S. Senate or U.S. House, not in Bath Township.  Corruption has captured our election process!  Our U.S. Supreme Court accepted such a case and ignored it. Independents outnumber D and R.  Please notice where selecting only D or R has gotten us!

_______________________

Commentary of May 1, 2015:  The Planned Collapse of the Domestic American Economy

            Barack Hussein Obama, II, a/k/a/ Barry Soetoro, may be the only elected person in Washington, D.C., USA, doing what he was bought and paid to do:  Destroy the domestic American economy!

The problem in Baltimore is two-fold and easy to solve.  Short-term everyone who showed up for the planned destruction should (1) shut-up; and, (2) go home.  Tax-paying citizens of Baltimore should (1) shut-up; (2) go home; and, (3) pay up.  Citizens “pay up” because they foolishly allowed incompetence to establish itself as dominant and in detriment to city of Baltimore, state of Maryland, and the United States of America; meanwhile, as with Akron, Ohio the city of Baltimore needs a City Manager.. 

            Long-term the USA must follow its Constitution and establish a Justice system: “Liberty and Justice for all.”  Our existing "Justice Department" is corrupt!  We have only a "Legal System," a seriously unjust one. This "Legal System" denies justice and liberty to large segments of our population.  USA’s current Legal System (1) must be dissolved, replaced with justice-seeking persons regardless of their race or religion, and we (2) must have term-limits!  As President of the United States of America I would achieve these changes quickly. 

National and international socialists seek and have sought to destroy America, most notably Germany with World Wars I and II, (16 million innocent lives lost in Germany’s War I, 60 million innocent lives lost in Germany’s War II).  German NAZI’s demanded “National Socialism” and currently all of Europe is socialist.  Germany lost both battles but won both wars!  Germany controls the European Economic Union, and EURO – each a failed institution and each with socialists in charge.  Roman Catholic Pope Francis has joined the fray claiming the major global problem is the USA with its capitalism, price system, free enterprise, private property.  The Pope is wrong!   

            Emperor Nero fiddled his violin while Rome burned; In modern times the mayor of Baltimore, Maryland, elected because she is Black and because she is female cannot duplicate Nero’s trick because she may not know how to play a musical instrument but she knows how to abuse power and position of public office, as did Nero.  Citizens of Baltimore trusted and respected the mayor, gave the mayor her office; however and perhaps through no fault of her own, the Baltimore mayor shares with Nero the characteristic of being incompetent?

We must elect persons to public office based on their education, background, truthfulness, and experience.  A good athlete, or a popular movie star or similar but incompetent person, brings only ruin to the person and to every citizen who voted - and to persons refusing to vote.  Disaster strikes each time we allow incompetent persons to occupy positions of power, authority and responsibility.  We have entrusted our affairs of state to all the wrong people, and for all the wrong reasons!  We need educated, mature and intelligent persons in charge. Meanwhile, ignore all comments emanating from every sedition-prone preacher!

We must have term limits!

______     

February 16, 2015: The Office of President of the United States of America. THOMAS JOSEPH COYNE, BBA, MBA, Ph.D. - tom@coyne-assoc.com.

TOM COYNE IS WILLING, ABLE AND INTERESTED IN BECOMING PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE ELECTION(S) OF 2016 AND SHALL DO SO IF HE IS ABLE TO GET HIS NAME ON THE BALLOT(S).

Financial Economist, Professor of Finance – tenured, inactive -

I was born and raised in Wheeling, West Virginia and am a graduate of Wheeling Central Catholic High School. I refused to accept any wage/salary/federal pension and/or other government financial benefits if elected to the U.S. Senate in 2014; This identical pledge is made again, 2015, as I hereby and herein expresses interest in running for and winning the Office of President of the United States of America! To date, ballot access has been denied to me by USA's Ruling Class (the Democrat Party in conspiracy with the Republican Party and our Propaganda Press = "Ruling Class") in Ohio and West Virginia - since 1994. Thomas J. Coyne, Ph.D. had over 11,000 petition signatures, signed and printed, in Ohio in 1994 to run for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Howard Metzenbaum. 5,500 (1/2) of those signed and printed petitions were stolen from a sorority house at The Ohio State University, Columbus, the same day Howard Taft (R. Ohio), Secretary of State in Ohio, claimed inability to read any of the remaining 5,500 signed and printed petition forms; In West Virginia Secretary of State Joseph Manchin (D. WV) refused to provide Tom Coyne's written request for "appropriate petition forms" in my effort to get my name on the ballot for Governor of WV, a governorship sought and obtained at the same time by Joseph Manchin himself. Manchin's abuse of power and position was decided ultimately by Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Federal District Court, Wheeling, WV. Currently Joseph Manchin is U.S. Senator (D. WV); In 2014, in West Virginia, Tom Coyne's effort to get his name on the ballot for U.S. Senator (L. WV) was blocked by fictitious/fraudulent "convention" activity in Charleston, WV. Why is the USA's Ruling Class so fearful of Tom Coyne? Answer: "Ruling Class" knows Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D., needs only your non-financial help to get his name on the ballot and once on the ballot, Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D., will win the seat! Are you able to help?

ONCE ELECTED I WILL ACCEPT NO WAGE, SALARY, SUPPLEMENT OR PENSION DURING MY TENURE IN OFFICE. I SHALL ACCEPT NO MONEY FROM ANYONE, ANYWHERE FOR ANY REASON. I SHALL SERVE ONE TERM ONLY. I SHALL SERVE AS AN INDEPENDENT PERSON. UNLIKE CURRENT LIFE-LONG PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS RUNNING FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN BOUGHT BY POLITICAL PARTY BOSSES, PARTY "CHAIRS" TO WHOM LOYALTY IS PLEDGED BY PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS IN RETURN FOR MONEY AND ENDORSEMENTS FOR OFFICE. SUCH "LEADERS" SHALL NOT INSTRUCT TOM COYNE CONCERNING ANY POSITION(S) HE DECIDES TO TAKE. I WILL WORK WITH THESE 'BIG MONEY' BOSSES BUT WILL NOT BE CONTROLLED BY THEM. SO HELP ME GOD! I WORK ONLY FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF USA CITIZENS AND RESTORATION OF THIS ONCE-GREAT NATION, BUT I NEED HELP, YOUR NON-FINANCIAL HELP!

Scroll down on this page,www.coyne-assoc.com, and see AutobiographicalSketch.htm to learn my solutions to problems we face. Let me hear from you if you have any questions. See especially the "Archives" section near the bottom of AutobiographicalSketch.htm. See also summary_of_works_by_thomas j_htm.

We cannot change Washington until we change the person(s) we send to Washington! I am that necessary person. Will you help? By age, education background and desire no one is better qualified: I am am a published academic with integrity and heavy experience in business, government, labor, military and negotiations. No one being touted currently by the Propaganda Press comes anywhere near to having these qualifications. The person elected must be able to do the job. Tom Coyne gets things done

With your help I can and will do this job! So Help Me God.

Respectfully,

Thomas J. Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,

(Financial Economist)

www.coyne-assoc.com

================

IN THE MATER BETWEEN:

The United States of America
Department of Education
Washington, D. C. 20202

AND

American Federation of Government Employees
N. Capitol Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20001

______

Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service
            Case # 14 – 58828 – A

____

Representing the Government of the United States of America:

            Thomas J. Purple, OM Dir.
            U. S. Department of Education:  LBJ 4737
            400 Maryland Avenue, SW, 2E336
            Washington, D. C. 20202

Representing the Union:

            Rushab Sanghvi, Atty.          
            AFGE – District # 14
            444 North Capitol St. NW; # 841
            Washington, D. C. 20001

______

INTRODUCTION

This is a discipline case dealing with suspension for five days (5) of grievant, Randle Haley, General Attorney.

The date of this grievance was June 11, 2011.  The oral hearing was held on December 10, 2014 in Room 524, Wannamaker Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania beginning precisely at 9:00 AM and ending some thirty minutes later (30).  The right to arbitrate grievant suspension for (1) Inappropriate Conduct toward a Supervisor; and, (2) Inappropriate Conduct Regarding Use of Government Property was unquestioned.

Neither party appeared at the time and place scheduled for the oral hearing until the arbitrator telephoned counsel for the Department of Education who responded immediately saying he and counsel for Union were in an adjacent room but were coming immediately.  They arrived at 9:10 AM saying they had agreed to reinstate grievant as grievant has developed a better relationship recently with his supervisor, Issue item # 1.  Mention was made only briefly of the second item.  A report has been made with respect to Issue item # 2 the arbitrator was told.  The second matter is criminal, they said, and may or not be pursued by the Department of Education.  The matter is ended, they said, but what about heavy damages to the general public caused by Issue item 2?  One can pursue them individually if s/he wanted to do so, counsel for each side suggested to the arbitrator.  

Union and government representatives jointly announced to the arbitrator in large Conference Room # 524, Wannamaker Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, fifteen (15) minutes after each side failed to present witnesses and/or Exhibits other than the eight Joint Exhibits to which reference is made here, of their wish jointly to withdraw the grievance.  Except for counsel from each side, both sides had been “no show” participants at the oral hearing, until the phone call. 

Union and management representatives lack authority to withdraw once the arbitration oral hearing has begun.  We began in Philadelphia promptly at the time and place established/requested jointly by the parties: 9:00 AM.  Also, importantly, withdrawal is impossible subsequent to revelation of evidence contained in Joint Exhibit 6 which explains in detail existence of Department of Education government employee participation in criminal activity.  An arbitrator does not  permit unilateral withdrawal from arbitration proceedings if doing so conceals more than it reveals about the issue at arbitration:  intentional manipulation of the 2008 national election in the USA in this case - in violation of the Hatch Act.   

According to Technical Crimes Division, United States Department of Education, Joint Exhibit # 6, in violation of the Hatch Act, many government employees successfully may have manipulated the general election in the United States of America in calendar year 2008.   

Ostensibly, allegedly, this is a discipline case dealing with “the penalty of five day (5) suspension” of a General Attorney for “inappropriate behavior.” The status of the grievance was signed by grievant revealing an incident that occurred on June 10, 2011, presented to the arbitrator as Joint Exhibit # 4, the signed grievance, and received by this arbitrator on December 4, 2014

Eight joint exhibits were received on the same date including a Joint Exhibit # 6 which causes Joint # 4 to pale in comparison and causes the arbitrator to believe Joint # 4 conceals more than it reveals about the matter at hand.  Joint Exhibit # 3 is management answer to grievant.

Joint # 6 is a report from the Office of Inspector General, Technology Crimes Division (TCD), dealing with Randle Haley, Case # 90-110123.  This Joint # 6 reveals behavior of grievant prior to October 17, 2008, before the national elections for public office.  Joint # 6 reveals large numbers of Department of Education employees used their official authority and/or influence to interfere with the outcome of national elections in the United States of America in calendar year 2008.  Department of Education employees in large number (many hundreds) engaged in political activity while on government duty, in a government building, using government computers and other equipment.  These government employees were identified on October 20, 2008 by TCD as ones who sent emails in large quantity “containing the name of a national candidate for political office in the email subject line.”  Grievant, Randle Haley, General Attorney is named as the subject of this TCD report.

            “On October 20, 2008, the Technology Crimes Division (TCD) initiated an investigation to identify a large number of (government employees of the Department of Education) violating the Hatch Act, 5 USC # 7323 and # 7324.  All civilian employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the President and the Vice President, are covered by the provisions of the Act.  For purposes of the Hatch Act, political activity is defined as an activity directed toward the success or failure of a political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group, to include, but not limited to soliciting or receiving political contributions, soliciting or discouraging political activity of anyone with business before their agency” and other matters. 

            Joint Exhibit # 3 exists and alleges grievant entered “Supervisor Attorney and Team Leader’s office without being invited into that office.“ Grievant is said to have raised his voice and slammed a door.  This conduct was called inappropriate behavior.

ISSUE

Two parts/questions exist in this grievance:  (1) Was grievant disciplined for just cause for alleged misbehavior concerning verbiage and behavior associated with his supervisor; and, (2) Was grievant disciplined for just cause for alleged misbehavior in violation of the Hatch Act?  Was the discipline adequate, reasonable in each event?   

UNION POSITION

With respect to item #1 of the charge of inappropriate behavior discipline is overly burdensome as we are dealing here with a U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights employee for over ten (10) years.  He has had no recommendations for disciplinary suspension until placed under the direction of a female lawyer and only now because of her attitude and negative behavior.  She has been “curt” in how she expresses concern with work products and assignments.  Some of her methods for conveying concerns are disrespectful and unprofessional.  Her negative behavior appears to rise exponentially when she interacts with grievant.

Grievant strongly asserts he did not raise his voice to her; in fact, he expressed his belief that because her door was open he could walk in.  Grievant has First Amendment Rights.  His supervisor should consider his behavior appropriate.

With respect to item # 2 of the charge of inappropriate behavior, this charge is based in whole on the outcome of an investigation conducted by the Technology Crimes Division and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) concerning possible violations of the Hatch Act.  OIG developed thresholds that reduced some further investigations.  OIG conducted studies reducing the number of employees subject to administrative disciplinary action from an  initial 870 Department of Education employees in violation to 27.  Since the date of the report (September 8, 2010) filed by OIG concerning grievant, further investigations were conducted which reduced the number of employees subject to administrative disciplinary action from 27 to 17.  In addition employees from this group were given either an oral counseling, counseling, or a counseling memo, with the exception of one employee cited for a possible 10-day suspension (this case invoked for arbitration) based on other infractions beyond inappropriate behavior.

Grievant questions discipline based on the criminal matter before OIG.  Department of Education has its own disciplinary policies and OIG involvement is not included within those policies.

Grievant questions the penalty imposed upon him versus the penalties proposed for those employees who were similarly situated in this instance; therefore, he asks that his penalty of a five day (5) suspension be rescinded.   Everyone should receive the same discipline, the same penalty.  Equality of treatment is important.      

MANAGEMENT POSITION

An investigation conducted by the Department’s Technology Crimes Division (TCD) reveals grievant engaged in a pattern of inappropriate conduct with respect to excessive and inappropriate personal use of government computer equipment during calendar year 2008;  violations and inappropriate use of government’s computer systems were intentional and knowing on part of grievant; as an attorney poor, perhaps criminal conduct of grievant directly affects negatively public perception of and trust in the Department of Education; inappropriate conduct toward superiors is and has been an aggravating factor with respect to grievant; two of the most recent three performance ratings were “fully successful” while that last rating was minimally successful for this person; confidence of his superiors in his ability to exercise good judgment and professionalism has waned badly; grievant has exceeded by wide margin serious  thresholds of possible Hatch Actallowances, if any.  Legitimate mistakes, unknown errors, other exceptions to Hatch Act, if any, are unwarranted in this case; and, his misconduct (is considered) to be very serious.  No lesser penalty would suffice to deter such conduct in the future.  

FINDING

            By concealing Department of Education employee successful manipulation of the 2008 national election until December 4, 2014 when Joint Exhibit 6 was presented to and received by the arbitrator; by attempting unsuccessfully at the oral hearing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on December 10, 2014 to withdraw the arbitration, by joining with AFGE in being a “no show” until fifteen minutes after the arbitration hearing began; by alleging the major Issue is the slamming of a door and verbal general disrespect (loud talking or shouting) to a female supervisor; by revealing, admitting in excess of 800 hundred government employees at various levels within the Department of Education, United States Government were involved in Hatch Act violations prior to the 2008 national election, this arbitrator believes management and union conspired to keep the real issue secret long enough for a statute of limitations clause that might cause and/or allow declaration of Hatch Act violations a moot point, something devoid of legal significance.  Department of Education concealment and failure to act earlier, in 2010, on relevant data included, provided and ultimately presented on December 4, 2014 in Joint Exhibit 6 is wrong! 

The arbitrator considers violations of the Hatch Act to be the major problem, the Issue in this case.

            Department of Education and Union concealment of information contained in Joint Exhibit 6, if planned, is and has been seriously detrimental to honest employees within the Department of Education, those persons not involved in violations of the Hatch Act, and to populations-at-large throughout the world, but especially to taxpayer/citizens of the USA.  Concealment of government employee involvement in support of a named candidate for national election in 2008 cannot be condoned and/or supported by the arbitrator.

            “Inappropriate” behavior is the major issue cited by both sides in this case with definition of inappropriate evolving around an employee’s disrespect for a female supervisor, with emphasis by union and management focusing on loud talk to a supervisor.  This understatement of the Issue at arbitration conceals more than it reveals.  This approach is highly unprofessional, unethical, and appears in place to conceal illegal criminal behavior.  

Grievant, of all persons involved, being a lawyer, most certainly is expected by this arbitrator to have known what he was doing.  His supervisors being lawyers, most certainly are expected by this arbitrator to have known better.  By maintaining their silence supervisors and grievant and union have caused the arbitrator to think each has contributed significantly to the notion that Department of Education management and union persons conspired criminally to manipulate national votes in the election of 2008; the arbitrator believes also the unsuccessful attempt by both parties to withdraw the arbitration after it began at oral hearing was an attempt to avoid publication of this AWARD thereby solidifying, concealing forever Department of Education management/Union violation of Hatch Act secrets.  In a “no show” situation at arbitration the arbitrator is required to fashion a grievance issue and fashion an appropriate remedy associated with that grievance. 

It is reasonable to assume that had management pursued criminal charges once made available by TCD on September 9, 2010, results of our national election in 2012 would have been different; thus, manipulation of voters in 2008 affected the general public vote in national elections in 2008 and 2012.  Gross dereliction of duty by Department of Education management in 2010 was instrumental to the outcome of USA national elections in 2012.

            Criminal behavior is rewarded when Hatch Act violations go unreported and unpunished at the management and/or union level, and a member of the general taxpaying public has no recourse. Management knew criminal activity existed no later than September 8, 2010 but chose to do nothing! 

The private citizen has no standing in criminal court.  Only government officials can pursue criminals.  When government employees refuse to do the work they pledged to do upon appointment to their respective positions, the citizen has nothing.  S/he has no recourse.  No remedy at law exists.  This situation cannot be allowed to stand in a land where government is of, by and for the people.  

            Manipulating or attempting to manipulate a free national election goes far beyond “inappropriate behavior.”  It is criminal by definition.

If government employees as the Department of Education are permitted to go unpunished by violations of the Hatch Act, is it fair to and equal treatment of other government employees in other government agencies, say, persons at Internal Revenue Service, Environmental Protection Agency, and so on, not to have an equal right to manipulate national elections?  If government employees go undiscovered, unpunished in accordance with provisions of the Hatch Act, are government employees free to manipulate future elections? Have government employees manipulated past elections?  How many and how is one to know? 

No government agency is permitted to exempt itself from federal law! 

In a democracy the best organized minority of voters controls/wins national elections.  Government employees represent a minority of voters.  If every government agency, or even a small handful of government agencies, behaved as Department of Education in this FMCS case behaved, complete with misuse of government power and position, and taxpayer offices, equipment and money to influence the outcome of national elections, no candidate or political party or policy can win an election, ever,  without government employee approval. 

If a lawyer and/or other employees of the Department of Education contacts via Email or otherwise, public school offices of superintendents across the nation reminding each superintendent of the large amount of money made available by government to his school district annually, and informing the superintendent this high quantity of money might not be sustained unless the superintendent and his employees (teachers, cooks, bus drivers, etc.) vote for the national candidate cited in the subject line of the Email, what does a superintendent do? 

If government employees go unpunished for violation of the Hatch Act in 2008 government employees may feel validated to violate Hatch Act provisions during national elections in 2016.  

AWARD

This grievance is denied. 

Criminal investigation(s) shall continue as confirmed to the arbitrator jointly by counsel in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania at 9:25 AM of the oral hearing, December 10, 2014, such criminal investigations to be of government employees on payrolls of the USA’s Department of Education.   

The suspension of pay and allowances discipline dispensed to grievant is reasonable and adequate for Issue item # 1 of the grievance. 

Department of Education failed to discipline grievant properly for Issue item # 2.  The U. S. Department of Education is held accountable here and shall correct this failure.  Discipline to date is unreasonably inappropriate, inadequate with respect to Issue item # 2 of this grievance.  Termination of employment with forfeiture of pay, allowances and benefits to include pension is hereby and herein required of grievant for violation of Issue item # 2. 

Any management or union person on government payroll who abused the power and position of his/her office; namely, each person who used his/her time, talent and/or government position to work towards manipulation of outcome of a national election, in violation of the Hatch Act, in 2008, reference to which is made in this grievance, shall be terminated with forfeiture of pay, allowances and benefits to include pension. This punishment includes every Department of Education government employee who was working from home. 

Prison and financial fine(s), amount of each yet to be determined, shall be imposed for each person found guilty as a result of the investigation conducted by the United States Department of Education, Office of Inspector General Technology Crimes Division, signed and submitted to appropriate government officials on September 8, 2010, cited as Joint Exhibit 6 for the oral hearing of this grievance.    

The arbitrator maintains jurisdiction in this case until further notice is issued by him.

 Issue item 2 is a very serious criminal matter!  The Hatch Act exists for a reason and no government agency may exempt itself from it or other federal law!

Written in Bath, Ohio, USA
January 15, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas Joseph Coyne, MBA, Ph.D.,
Arbitrator
__________________

January 20, 2015 reminder: NO NATION IS ON TOP IF IT'S LEADERSHIP IS NOT!

-----------------------------

____November 17, 2003; Reprinted again this 23rd day of February, 2015 as an "I told you so" Commentary. by Thomas J. Coyne, Ph.D., future President of the United States of America!

Commentaries (2)

(I) The United Nations, I”

The failed “League of Nations,” headquartered in San Francisco, resulted in creation of the “United Nations,” (UN) headquartered currently in New York City. The UN, too, is a failed organization. The USA must withdraw membership, financial and other support from the UN.

UN diplomats come mostly from socialist nations, are unelected persons from those foreign communities